Re: [Discuss] Refactoring KahaDBStore class

2018-11-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
l open a card on Jira & prepare a PR. > > Notes: > ActiveMQ KahaDB Store and ActiveMQ-Unit-Tests suites remain passing > after refactor. > > Cheers, > Jamie > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to gitbox on January, 9th

2019-01-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Repositories have been moved by INFRA. I'm now updating the scm location where I can. Regards JB On 10/01/2019 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > Following this, the migration of all of our repositories started. > > I will keep you posted soon. > > Regards &g

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to gitbox on January, 9th

2019-01-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, Following this, the migration of all of our repositories started. I will keep you posted soon. Regards JB On 07/01/2019 20:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > as mentioned in the other thread, and in order to give visibility to > everyone, I would like to do the mo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
gt;>> >>>> You don’t need a vote… It’s going to happen one way or another by Feb >> 7. >>>> >>>> The only issue is weather to be pro-active and do it now or wait a >> little bit. If we have releases imminent, I’d say wait till after the

[PROPOSAL] Migrate to gitbox on January, 9th

2019-01-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Jenkins. >From a committer perspective, the only thing to change is to update git remote to gitbox. So, without objection, I will do the move on January, 9th (or if you think we can do it before, please let me know as I'm ready). Thanks, Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to gitbox on January, 9th

2019-01-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
is shouldn't affect your date. I just want to understand if we need > to do anything about them. > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 2:54 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> as mentioned in the other thread, and in order to give visibility to >> everyone, I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to gitbox on January, 9th

2019-01-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Clebert, We have to create a Jira for INFRA to fix. I will do that. Regards JB On 11/01/2019 18:06, Clebert Suconic wrote: > The comitts now are coming to the dev list instead of the commit list. > > > Anyone know how to fix it ? > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 8:32 AM Je

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Website updated!

2019-04-05 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
is update has been a long time coming, and I extend my thanks to > everybody who contributed. Well done! > > > Justin > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18151 > [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/ > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/

Re: [VOTE] Website Update

2019-03-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
che/activemq-website/ > > This repo includes instructions on how to modify, test, & update the site. > > > [ ] +1 approve the promotion of the new website to be the official ActiveMQ > website > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Here's my +

Re: [Discuss] automated github messages on a separate list

2019-02-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
enough to follow. So I propose we move GitHub comments to a > separate list. > > > We could leave this list for more generic and important discussions. Such > as the web site. Architectural decisions. Releases. And eventually even > codes but without the clutter of git

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP v3.9.5

2019-01-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
d=12311207=12335498> > > > Please cast your votes: > > [ ] +1 Release the source as Apache ActiveMQ-CPP 3.9.5 > [ ] -1 (provide specific comments) > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

[DISCUSSION] ActiveMQ 5.x roadmap, codename ActiveMQ Missus

2019-06-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
and "milestone". Thoughts ? Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation

2019-06-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
aving JDK 11/12 support will be great and we can finally release > 5.16.0 > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 4:27 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> By the way, once 5.15.10 will be released (hopefully beginning of next >> week), I will focus on 5.16.0, especially with J

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation

2019-06-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
By the way, once 5.15.10 will be released (hopefully beginning of next week), I will focus on 5.16.0, especially with JDK 11/12 full support. Regards JB On 13/06/2019 14:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > some days ago, I proposed to move forward on ActiveMQ 5.15.10.

[HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation

2019-06-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
time than I expected. So, just to let you know that I'm focus on 5.15.10 release preparation but I need some more days (probably about 5 more days). If you have some specific Jira or fixes you want to see in 5.15.10, please ping me directly. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono

[PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release

2019-05-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release

2019-05-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
le with JDK 11. > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 8:27 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The PRs without Jira were minor, but I will create the corresponding >> Jira anyway, at least for the tracking. >> >> For the release, I propos

Re: dist area clean up needed for old releases

2019-05-23 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
I will thanks. Le 23 mai 2019 à 19:05, à 19:05, Robbie Gemmell a écrit: >I have now updated the links on the 5.14.5 release page to point to >the archive. Can a PMC member clean it from the dist area please? > >That could be accomplished by running e.g: >svn rm -m "clean out old release from

Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release

2019-05-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ivemq/commit/68c91621a0568a0d47e66a800833e1770c27b7d8 On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 1:53 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi team, I started to review some PRs and I'm also working on some improvements/fixes PR (for OSGi, but also preparing better cloud support features). I would like to submit to v

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:34 AM wrote: > >> There was feedback i gave some on that thread. >> >> >> >> >> Get Outlook for Android >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:43 AM +0100, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-08 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
t;I don’t think the community reached a consensus in order to include on >the >report. > >If you want to mention it on the report mention the discussion didn’t >reach >a consensus yet. > >On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >wrote: > >> Hi

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-08 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
by July 10, 2019. >> >> -- >> perl -e 'print >> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E> >> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ >> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder >> > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation

2019-08-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, it seems the assembly issue was a temporary one related to the Camel website update (the xsd was not available during the new Camel website publication). I'm double checking and starting the release process if ok. Regards JB On 21/08/2019 08:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > By the

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation

2019-08-21 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> just a quick update about 5.15.10 preparation. >> >> Some more cherry-pick have been done and I have more in the TODO list. >> >> I plan to submit 5.15.10 to vote next week. >

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation

2019-08-21 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
get JDK 11 support > working properly with everything. > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> just a quick update about 5.15.10 preparation. >> >> Some more cherry-pick have been done and I have more in the TODO lis

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #3)

2019-08-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
(please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #2)

2019-08-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
(please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release

2019-08-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Due to xsd update missing, I cancel this vote and I will submit a new one. Sorry about that. Regards JB Le 24 août 2019 09:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : Hi guys, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. This release includes dependency updates, and improvements

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release

2019-08-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6544 On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 3:50 AM Francois Papon wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks JB! > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org > > Le 24/08/2019 à 09:08

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #2)

2019-08-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, due to http test error and missing jbonofre key in KEYS file, I cancel this release. I will cut a new one tonight. Regards JB On 25/08/2019 10:15, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. > > This release includes dep

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #3)

2019-08-27 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, due to identified AMQ-7292, I cancel this vote to fix it. Sorry about that. Regards JB On 26/08/2019 22:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. > > This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. &

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-08-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Casting my own +1. Regards JB On 28/08/2019 12:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. > > This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. > > Please take a look on the Release Notes fo

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-08-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
related to CVE issues. Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #2)

2019-08-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
iveMQ/job/ActiveMQ-Java8/1310/ > > Colm. > > On 2019/08/25 08:15:43, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. >> >> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. >> &

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #2)

2019-08-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ert the commits. > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 4:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. >> >> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. >> >> Please ta

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #2)

2019-08-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
as well. >>> >>> Furthermore, I couldn't find your PGP key here: >>> https://home.apache.org/keys/ >>> >>> Also, it looked like you force pushed the 5.15.x branch. In the future >>> don't force push, just revert the commits. >>> >>>

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, this vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Christopher Shannon, Clebert Suconic, Timothy Bish, Michael Pearce +1 (non binding): Colm O'hEigeartaigh, Krzysztof, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Jamie Goodyear I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release

2019-08-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
-- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: ActiveMQ 5.15.10 not yet advertised on website

2019-09-05 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ote passed for the release of 5.15.10, and that the maven > repository and download folder are both in place, but the website still > indicates 5.15.9 as the current release. Did something go wrong with the > publishing process? > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://bl

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-12 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
e website and sending a release email? > It's important to get that out as soon as possible after a release is > finished and it's been almost 2 weeks. > > > On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> this vote passed

Re: ActiveMQ 5.15.10 not yet advertised on website

2019-09-12 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
by now and the site should be updated. > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:27 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It's on the way, I'm preparing the website update. Chris helped me to >> finalize the release (publishing on dist.apache.org), so, now I'm moving >> for

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, just to let you know that I'm now back from ApacheCon. I will resume website update and announcement today and tomorrow. Regards JB On 12/09/2019 17:02, Cesar Hernandez wrote: > Thanks for the update Chris. > +1 > > El jue., 12 sept. 2019 a las 8:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré (

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, @Chris, following the process, I would need help of a PMC to merge the website PR. Would you have time later today (PR is on the way) ? I will send the announcement email when website is ok. Regards JB On 16/09/2019 15:11, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > just to let

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ote that unlike >> the release repo area you dont need a PMC member to push updates to >> the website. >> >> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 06:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> @Chris, following the process, I would need h

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
, 19 Sep 2019 at 06:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> @Chris, following the process, I would need help of a PMC to merge the >> website PR. Would you have time later today (PR is on the way) ? I will >> send the announcement email when website is ok. >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
uation it would be helpful to ensure > you knew the website updates can be / normally are pushed directly, to > hopefully help avoid the release publishing process going past the 3 > week mark. > > Robbie > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 06:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >&

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation

2019-07-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, just a quick update about 5.15.10 preparation. Some more cherry-pick have been done and I have more in the TODO list. I plan to submit 5.15.10 to vote next week. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 13/06/2019 14:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > some days ago, I

Re: ActiveMQ cve vulnerabilities seen in latest version

2019-07-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
y even if the issue is fixed. > > I have attached the pom.xml and the dependency check reports for your > reference. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 5.16.0 minimum Java version

2019-11-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, I got a consensus as follow: - 5.15.x: JDK 8 max - 5.16.x: JDK 8 still compliant, support of JDK 9+ - 5.17.x: JDK 9+ min I've updated Jira accordingly. Thanks for your comments ! Regards JB On 31/10/2019 11:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > As I'm working

Re: i want to know the count of Message IDs.

2019-11-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> On click of QueName, system displayed me lots of Message IDs. > > How can I get its count in .net? > > Thanks > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono..

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2

2019-10-31 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP > > > Regards, > Michael > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 5.16.0 minimum Java version

2019-10-31 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Tim, I agree, let me focus on 5.16.0 running with JDK 8, 9, 11, 12 ... It makes sense. I'm completing 5.15.11 now, and 5.16.0 will follow. Regards JB On 31/10/2019 16:53, Timothy Bish wrote: > On 10/31/19 6:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> As

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2

2019-11-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
olved. >>>>> >>>>> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please >>>>> check it and vote accordingly. >>>>> >>>>> This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP >>> client.. >>>>> >>>>> Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to >>>>> make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly, >>>>> creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget. >>>>> >>>>> The files can be grabbed >>>>> from: >>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/ >>>>> >>>>> The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Michael >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Clebert Suconic >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2

2019-11-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Sorry, I meant for Artemis Native vote, sorry for the cross meaning. Regards JB On 06/11/2019 18:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > In case you originally meant to direct it elsewhere instead...you > actually did cast the first vote in the thread. > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:19, Jean-Bap

Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ official Docker images and K8S yml

2019-12-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
roved their > support on docker or not. > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on: >> - Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apache Docker

Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ official Docker images and K8S yml

2019-12-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
; On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi Clebert, >> >> The purpose is more to populate docker hub within the build. >> >> It's what I'm doing for Karaf: >> >> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf/tags >&

Re: Building Errors

2019-12-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Pool ... FAILURE [ 1.457 > s] > [INFO] ActiveMQ :: RA ......... SKIPPED > [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Spring . SKIPPED > > Please help to resolve this build error. > > Thanks > Goutam Giri > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: activemq

2019-12-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ort and > picking up (Consumer) from a broker on another can I implement it in > activemq in apache > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)

2019-12-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> some trivial fixups remain outstanding. > > Robbie > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 12:00, Christopher Shannon > wrote: >> >> JB, >> >> Are you still working on the website update and release email for the >> release? >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2

Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing ActiveMQ 5.15.11 and 5.16.0

2019-10-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ase to vote next week as well. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 25/09/2019 09:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, I started the triage and fixes on ActiveMQ 5.15.11. We have 9 issues to address in 5.15.11. I hope to have those 9 issues addressed by middle of next week and I plan to submit 5.15

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release

2019-11-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
/activemq/5.15.11/ Git tag: activemq-5.15.11 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release

2019-11-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
gt; >> regards, >> >> François >> fpa...@apache.org >> >> Le 20/11/2019 à 06:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, >>> probably next week), I'

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)

2019-11-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
-- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release

2019-11-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
rocess-resource-bundles of goal > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process failed.: > NullPointerException -> [Help 1] > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:55 AM jgenender wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent f

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release

2019-11-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, due to build issue on activemq-osgi module, I cancel this vote to submit a new one (the issue is already fixed, weird I didn't have the issue on my machine during the vote build). Regards JB On 20/11/2019 06:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release

2019-11-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Fair enough, let me cancel the vote and cut a new one. Thanks, Regards JB On 20/11/2019 16:45, Christopher Shannon wrote: > I do consider it a blocker because I can't run the unit tests or build from > the tag so it needs to be fixed. > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:45 AM Jean-Bap

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)

2019-11-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Here's my +1 (non binding) Regards JB On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, > probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your vote. > This is take #2 c

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)

2019-11-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Just a gently reminder: we would need an additional PMC (binding) vote to complete this vote. Thanks Regards JB On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, > probably next week), I'm submitt

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)

2019-11-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi all, this vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon, Michael Andre Pearce +1 (non binding): Jonathan Gallimore, François Papon, Jamie Goodyear, Jean-Baptiste Onofré I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and update Jira. One PMC will help me

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)

2019-11-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
gt; >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 7:05 AM +, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" < >> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Here's my +1 (non binding) >> >> Regards >>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)

2019-11-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thanks a lot ! Much appreciated. Regards JB On 25/11/2019 19:01, Christopher Shannon wrote: > I promoted the artifacts: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.11/ > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi all

[PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ official Docker images and K8S yml

2019-11-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on: - Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apache Docker image for ActiveMQ - Several k8s yml files (with different scenarios) I propose to integrate this in the ActiveMQ codebase. Thoughts ? Regards JB -- Jea

[DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 5.16.0 minimum Java version

2019-10-31 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
upgrade). We have two options here: - still support JDK8 and run with newer version (and then, we have to keep JDK8 compliant dependencies, like Derby 10.14.2.0 for instance) - define JDK9 as minimum version to run and then, we can upgrade the dependencies. Thoughts ? Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 5.16.0 minimum Java version

2019-10-31 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
fer something that still ran on Java 8, but I'll > understand if I'm in the minority. > > What benefits do we get from upgrading Derby to 10.15.1.3 and therefore > requiring Java 9? > > Jon > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:26 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Awesome, thanks, I'm preparing the announcement e-mail. Regards JB On 20/09/2019 15:57, Christopher Shannon wrote: > website has been updated > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi Robbie, >> >> It makes sense. Regarding

[ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 released !

2019-09-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ 5.15.10. You can find more details on: https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-51510-release A big thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. We look forward to your feedback.

[HEADS UP] Preparing ActiveMQ 5.15.11 and 5.16.0

2019-09-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
and JDK 11 full support. I'm reviewing the Jira for 5.16.0 and defining the priorities. My goal is to be able to submit 5.16.0 release around end of November. Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing ActiveMQ 5.15.11 and 5.16.0

2019-09-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
some cycles and would like to pick up some JIRAs to work on. > > Jon > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:45 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I started the triage and fixes on ActiveMQ 5.15.11. >> >> We have 9 issues to address in 5.15.

Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing ActiveMQ 5.15.11 and 5.16.0

2019-10-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
to submit the release to vote by the end of this month or beginning of November. Stay tuned ! Regards JB On 25/09/2019 09:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > I started the triage and fixes on ActiveMQ 5.15.11. > > We have 9 issues to address in 5.15.11. I hope to have

Re: [HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 and ActiveMQ 5.16.0

2020-01-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
16.0 instead of waiting til 5.17.0? > > Colm. > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi Christopher, >> >> OK, so, I will move forward on 5.16.0 with JDK11 support at runtime. >> >> I will focus on JDK11 build + LevelDB

[HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 and ActiveMQ 5.16.0

2020-01-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
at runtime. 2. I do the changes required to build with JDK11, and then we will only support JDK11 at runtime. Thoughts ? Anyway, I would like to submit 5.16.0 to vote asap, so please, let me know what you think about JDK support (build or/and runtime). Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono

Re: [HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 and ActiveMQ 5.16.0

2020-01-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
asier on ourselves and remove LevelDB entirely as it > has been deprecated now for several major versions and there isn't any > reason to keep it at around at this point. > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >

Re: supported windows for ActiveMq 5.9

2020-01-21 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
stall ActiveMQ 5.9 in Windows server 2012? > Refer: > https://activemq.apache.org/getting-started.html#InstallationProcedureforWindows > > > Windows: Windows XP SP2, Windows 2000, Windows Vista, Windows 7. > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.c

Re: Add to list: activemq-developers

2020-01-21 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ave a go at fixing some of the issues. > My registered email address - piyushchugh1...@gmail.com > > > Thanks & Regards, > Piyush Chugh > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Request to be added as contributor

2020-01-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, It's done. Regards JB On 20/01/2020 14:16, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone with the relevant permissions please add me as a contributor to > AMQ JIRA, so that I can assign issues to myself? > > Thanks, > > Colm. > -- Jean-Baptiste Onof

Re: First board report of 2020

2020-01-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
unless they show > important details. It seems like all they show is that it was a > holiday filled quarter and so some things were lower volume than the > prior one without thier effect. > > I tweaked the 5.15.11 release info to use its actual Nov 25th release date. > >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)

2020-01-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> for my PR feedback and also the generated site output. You can >> announce the release now. >> >> Robbie >> >> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 19:55, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> >>> I tried to build with Jekyll but it failed on my machine. >&g

Re: First board report of 2020

2020-01-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
was a >> holiday filled quarter and so some things were lower volume than the >> prior one without thier effect. >> >> I tweaked the 5.15.11 release info to use its actual Nov 25th release date. >> >> Robbie >> >> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 07:14, Jean-Baptiste

Re: First board report of 2020

2020-01-05 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
bmit your contributions to the > latest report to the ASF board: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=144509735 > > This report must be submitted by Jan 8, so please don't wait. > > Bruce > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http:

Re: First board report of 2020

2020-01-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
t;> be an important milestone with full JDK 9+ support and JMS 2.0 support >> as well." >> >> The example skeleton on reporter.apache.org doesnt include the stats >> from what I recall as they often asked folks not to include them, so >> I'd drop those. I just give a

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi everyone, Now that we fixed the ASF header issue, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release to your vote (take #2). This release is an important milestone as the runtime supports JDK 11. The full build with JDK 11 is planned for 5.17.0. It also includes bunch of fixes, improvements and much

Re: [DISCUSS] JMS 2.0 support in 5.x going forward

2020-06-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
better use of time to just work on improving the migration and feature > parity of 5.x with Artemis instead of adding JMS 2.0 support as Artemis > already supports it. If migration is easier and if all the main 5.x > features people care about work in Artemis then people could just migrate > to Artemis. > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Non-canonical alignment for shared and replicated state terminology

2021-07-12 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
he existing user base. Thank you, -Matt Pavlovich -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

[PROPOSAL] Remove nabble links from website

2021-08-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, I created pull request https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/56 on website to remove the nabble link from the contact page. Since nabble downgraded their servers capacity, a bunch of forums linked to mailing list are not available anymore. It's the case for several

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove nabble links from website

2021-08-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Justin already merged the PR, so I guess we are good ;) Thanks ! Regards JB On 13/08/2021 16:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, I created pull request https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/56 on website to remove the nabble link from the contact page. Since nabble

Re: ActiveMQ Feathercast interview request

2021-08-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Rich, It's pretty open on my side, just have to know at least 24 hours before. Regards JB On 27/08/2021 22:11, Rich Bowen wrote: I'm certainly not opposed to having more than one person on the interview, but it does make scheduling more challenging, because time zones are hard. How about

[ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.3 has been released!

2021-08-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi everyone, The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.3 feature. https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5016003-release This release includes updates, improvements and important fixes, especially: - fix on potential connection deadlock - fix on broker plugin allowing

Re: ActiveMQ Feathercast interview request

2021-09-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thanks Rich ! And thanks for Justin, Clebert and Matt as well ;) Regards JB On 03/09/2021 17:42, Rich Bowen wrote: Thank you so much for everyone that participated in the call. I'll edit and run a draft by this list before publishing. --Rich On 2021/08/27 16:55:14, Rich Bowen wrote: Hi,

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.3 release

2021-08-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ld on some environment due to long file path. I will fix by using posix instead of gnu. Sorry about that, I will submit a new vote soon. Regards JB On 06/08/2021 19:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi everyone, I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.3 release to your vote. This release includes impor

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.18.0 release

2021-08-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Just a quick note: the vote section of the email mention 2.4.0, but we are actually voting on 2.18.0. Not a big deal ;) Thanks ! Regards JB On 09/08/2021 20:50, Clebert Suconic wrote: Just wanted to record my +1. and update the voting template from previous vote (sorry for

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >