certainly also tradeoffs to it vs alternatives. You were proposing
> > something different here, can you flesh out your original idea for
> > comparison? Had you implemented something?
> >
> > On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 07:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > >
> > &
Hi guys,
I started to work on ActiveMQ 5.18.x major release preparation.
Basically, I propose to include (as major changes, in addition of all
others more "minor" changes :)):
- JMS 2.x support (mostly client and first part broker)
- Spring 6 update
- Jakarta namespace support
I should have the
Hi
- Yes, the clients (5.16.x) are compatible with 5.17.x broker
- Java 11 is required broker side, client using Java8 (with previous
AMQ 5.16.x version) for instance can use 5.17.x broker without problem
- No concrete matrix as it's backward compatible in term of protocol.
We plan a
Thanks
> Kshitij
>
>
>
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Date: Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 3:39 PM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Cc: users-h...@activemq.apache.org ,
> dev-h...@activemq.apache.org , Kulkarni, Vinay
> , Kumawat, Tapan
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re
The Apache ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce the ActiveMQ 5.17.3 release.
This release includes several updates, fixes and improvements, especially:
- upgrade to Spring 5.3.23
- upgrade to Jetty 9.4.49.v20220914
- upgrade to log4j 2.19.0
- fix jolokia access configuration file loading on
will send the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 4:31 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.3 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 32 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Fix ActiveMQ C
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:54 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.27.1 release
>
>
> This is a bug fix release,
>
> I would like to highlight these 3 bug fixes:
>
> - AMQP Large Message over Bridges were broken
> - Rollback
Hi all,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.3 release to your vote.
This release includes 32 fixes and improvements, especially:
- Fix ActiveMQ Console on Karaf 4.4.x
- Fix Jolokia startup on Windows platform
- Upgrade to Spring 5.3.23
- Upgrade to Jackson 2.14.0
- and much more!
Please take a look on
Hi guys
We just have one pending Jira for 5.17.3 release.
I gonna fix that today (windows platform specific issue).
I plan to submit 5.17.3 release to vote tonight my time.
Regards
JB
+1 (binding)
Casting my own vote ;)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 4:31 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.3 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 32 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Fix ActiveMQ Console on Karaf
Hi Bruce,
I think replying to a "call for report" email is OK.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:27 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> I just realized that we were notified about our board report too late to
> even submit the report as the meeting is scheduled to take place tomorrow.
> So, let's
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
Le mer. 9 nov. 2022 à 03:33, Justin Bertram a écrit :
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.27.0 release.
>
> New and noteworthy items in 2.27.0:
>
> - Fix for CVE-2022-42889 (Apache Commons Text vulnerability)
> - Logging implementation moved to
nks!
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Mar 4, 2023, at 11:44 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now 5.17.4 has been released, I propose to move forward on 5.18.0 release.
> >
> > The target is to submit this release to vote at the end of next week.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regards
> > JB
>
Hi,
After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit ActiveMQ 5.18.0 to
your vote. This release is a major milestone for ActiveMQ bringing
major changes:
- JMS 2 API support (client)
- support Jakarta namespace (client)
- a lot of dependency updates and fixes
- and much much more!
You can take a
link
> > will need to make sure to document very carefully what exactly is and
> > isn't supported in each release in regards to the JMS 2.0 and Jakarta APIs.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 3:47 AM Francois Papon
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-bindin
Gentle reminder, we would need an additional binding vote to have this
release vote pass.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 6:26 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit ActiveMQ 5.18.0 to
> your vote. This release is a
will prepare the announcement (update website, email, ...).
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 6:26 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit ActiveMQ 5.18.0 to
> your vote. This release is a major milestone for Ac
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.0 release.
This release is an important milestone for the ActiveMQ project, providing:
- JMS 2.0 client support with both javax.jms and jakarta.jms
namespaces (see https://activemq.apache.org/jms2 for details)
- JDK11+ support
- Spring
+1 (binding)
Obviously I did a bunch of tests with standalone brokers scenarios.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 6:26 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit ActiveMQ 5.18.0 to
> your vote. This release is a major milesto
will send the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 9:06 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit ActiveMQ 5.17.4 to your vote. This release includes several
> fixes, improvements and a lot of dependency updates, especially:
> - ad
Hi,
I submit ActiveMQ 5.17.4 to your vote. This release includes several
fixes, improvements and a lot of dependency updates, especially:
- add JOLOKIA_CONF env variable in wrapper configuration
- potential race condition in the store while creating new destinations
- fix reentrant lock in the
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.4 release.
ActiveMQ 5.17.4 includes several fixes, improvements, and dependency
updates as well, especially:
- add JOLOKIA_CONF env variable in wrapper configuration
- potential race condition in the store while creating new
Hi,
Now 5.17.4 has been released, I propose to move forward on 5.18.0 release.
The target is to submit this release to vote at the end of next week.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
s already announced finished in May 2022and this time
> we should remove it from the download page promptly.
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 15:37, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > this vote passed with the following result:
> >
> >
and dist.apache.org, then
I will update Jira and website, and I will do the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
FYI, ActiveMQ 5.17.4 vote will start soon (before the end of the week)!
Regards
JB
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 4:56 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We rec
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 9:06 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit ActiveMQ 5.17.4 to your vote. This release includes several
> fixes, improvements and a lot of dependency updates, especially:
> - add JOLOKIA_CONF env variable in wra
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.6 release.
NB: this should be the last release on the 5.16.x series, we strongly
invite all users to update to ActiveMQ 5.17.x series.
ActiveMQ 5.16.6 includes several fixes, improvements, and dependency
updates as well, especially:
-
that is unclear).
> >>>>
> >>>> I dont particularly care what version it is called. However I will say
> >>>> I dont think it would particularly be any more unusual to call it
> >>>> 5.19.x vs 5.18.x than it was with many other more i
nice
> > >>>> and add a maven relocation for it to the initial 5.19.0 release to
> > >>>> point them back to the normal client module, though as its not in
> > >>>> widespread use and doesnt even work yet, a need for that is unclear).
> >
+1
it looks good, thanks !
Sorry I was busy and didn't have time to add content to the report.
Regards
JB
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:34 PM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> I fleshed out the report with the stats + releases etc detail, tweaked
> the earlier additions from Justin and Matt, and
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.1 release.
This release is a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series.
It especially fixes an issue with the activemq-client-jakarta artifact.
You can find details on the Release Notes:
Hi,
The vote is not closed yet. As soon as we close the vote and announce
5.18.1 release, it will be available on Maven Central.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 9:33 AM Christian Winkler
wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I found that the 5.18.1 release of activemq-client-jakarta is not published
> on
and the website, and I will announce the release.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:26 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.1 release to your vote. This release
> fixes activemq-client-jakarta where the META-IN
Hi,
I agree with the plan but why not keep 5.19.0-SNAPSHOT on main ?
We have the activemq-5.18.x branch already that could be LTS where we
keep javax namespace.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 7:54 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Hello All-
>
> I started building a jakarta-based broker for
Hi,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.1 release to your vote. This release
fixes activemq-client-jakarta where the META-INF/services file was
missing in the artifact.
You can take a look on the Release Notes for details:
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:26 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.1 release to your vote. This release
> fixes activemq-client-jakarta where the META-INF/services file was
> missing in the artifact.
>
t;
> > >>>>> org.apache.activemq
> > >>>>> activemq-broker-jakarta
> > >>>>> 5.19.0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *2) Don't add new modules, just keep the same ones but have ea
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 4:56 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We receive several requests to provide a new (final) ActiveMQ 5.16.6
> release, including few security fixes/improvements.
>
> So, I submit ActiveMQ 5.16.6 release to your
Gentle reminder: we would need an additional binding vote to get 5.16.6 pass.
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 4:56 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We receive several requests to provide a new (final) ActiveMQ 5.16.6
> release, including few security fix
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 4:18 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0 release.
>
> I would like to highlight the following changes in this release:
>
> - Page counting improved. We no longer store counters in the journal
>
Hi guys,
We receive several requests to provide a new (final) ActiveMQ 5.16.6
release, including few security fixes/improvements.
So, I submit ActiveMQ 5.16.6 release to your vote. This one should be
the last version on the 5.16.x series, inviting our users to upgrade
to at least 5.17.x (or
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 1:39 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.29.0 release.
>
> This is a representative workload with 126 JIRAs and 200+ commits with
> a diverse number of committers. Thanks to all who contributed to
Hi guys,
FYI, we are preparing ActiveMQ 5.18.2 and 5.17.5 before moving forward
on 5.19.x (planned for next month).
I hope to be able to submit 5.18.2 and 5.17.5 releases to vote during
the weekend.
Stay tuned !
Regards
JB
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.2 release.
It’s a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.18.x series, bringing:
- fix potential NPE when removing consumer with selector
- fix composite consumers in a Network of Brokers
- fix memory leak on the STOMP transport when
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.5 release.
It’s a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.17.x series, bringing:
- fix on stale queues when a connection is long to shutdown
- fix on KahaDB where the db files may be larger than the maxLength
configuration
- fix on
Thanks all, I will rename apache/activemq to apache/activemq-classic.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:57 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> This weekend JB announced [1] the availability of official Docker images
> for ActiveMQ "Classic" in the "apache/activemq" namespace [2].
>
> Perhaps I
Hi Justin,
It has been discussed but not the name specifically.
As we use apache/activemq-artemis, I thought "logical" to use
apache/activemq (but maybe activemq-classic makes more sense).
I'm not sure we will be able to use apache/activemq/classic and
apache/activemq/artemis, but we can
Hi,
With the new Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.2 and 5.17.5 releases, we now
publish official docker images.
You can find these images directly on Docker Hub:
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq/tags
You can pull directly the images with:
docker pull apache/activemq:5.18.2
or
docker pull
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 3:54 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.30.0 release.
>
> This is mainly a bug-fix release with a few small improvements and a
> handful of dependency upgrades.
>
> The release notes can be found
Hi,
I moved the images to the new apache/activemq-classic repository.
You can find the available images here:
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq-classic/tags
Regards
JB
On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 7:31 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> With the new Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the report !
It looks good to me. About Classic, you mentioned the two releases we
did in June and the work about "Jakarta broker" planned for 5.19.x.
We will provide more details in the next report (I should have a more
concrete roadmap about 5.19.x just after my
Hi guys,
I did the Jira triage. I have a couple of fixes on the way. It should
be done by tomorrow. I plan to submit releases to vote on Friday this
week.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 3:20 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> FYI, we are preparing ActiveMQ 5.18.
er releasing the 5.19.x?
>
> The idea is to keep only 2 release branch active?
>
> regards,
>
> François
>
> On 15/06/2023 15:20, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > FYI, we are preparing ActiveMQ 5.18.2 and 5.17.5 before moving forward
Hi guys
I have a release build issue due to maven plugin updates. I'm fixing that.
I will start the votes today when fixed.
Sorry for this delay. Stay tuned!
Regards
JB
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 3:20 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> FYI, we are preparing Act
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 3:40 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.5 release to your vote. This release is
> a maintenance release on the 5.17.x series bringing:
> - fix on stale queues when a connection is long t
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 7:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.2 release to your vote. This release is
> a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series bringing:
> - fix potential NPE when removing consumer wit
ue the
> release as is.
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:09 AM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding) successfully ran internal test suite
> >
> > Thanks JB!
> >
> > Matt Pavlovich
> >
> > > On Jun 28, 2023, at 12:44 AM, Jean-Baptiste Ono
the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 3:40 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.5 release to your vote. This release is
> a maintenance release on the 5.17.x series bringing:
> - fix on stale queues when a
the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 7:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.2 release to your vote. This release is
> a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series bringing:
> - fix potential NPE when
Hi,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.2 release to your vote. This release is
a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series bringing:
- fix potential NPE when removing consumer with selector
- fix composite consumers in a NoB
- fix memory leak on the STOMP transport when client unsubscribe
- a bunch of
Hi guys,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.5 release to your vote. This release is
a maintenance release on the 5.17.x series bringing:
- fix on stale queues when a connection is long to shutdown
- fix on KahaDB where the db files may be larger than the maxLength
configuration
- fix on composite
Hi,
We discussed this already in the past. IMHO, we can replace jackson by
just sax (no need to use JSON-B regarding our usage).
That sasid, I don't see any huge issue with Jackson: it works fine and
we keep the versions up to date to fix CVE.
The only interesting move would be to use SAX
t want to re-invent the
> > wheel and create our own serializer, so we should at least use an existing
> > library, even if we make it pluggable like JSON-B.
> >
> > There's alternatives too like Gson if we wanted something
> > smaller/lightweight.
> >
> > On Tue, Ma
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 8:58 PM Havret wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have put together another release of activemq-nms-amqp. Please review it
> and vote accordingly.
>
> This update enhances the message acknowledgement functionality by
> supporting multiple AckType's, This
Hi,
I will check the xsd uploaded. 5.19.x is not yet there anyway.
For Jakarta, do you want the client side or broker side or both ?
Regards
JB
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 4:23 PM wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I checked out the latest classic ActiveMQ
> (https://github.com/apache/activemq.git)
> Due to my
Hi Mike,
It makes sense to have a component/sub-site dedicated to NMS.
Regards
JB
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:05 PM Michael André Pearce
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Krzysztof and I have been offline chatting and starting to feel the need to
> revamp the NMS docs, one thing we're finding is that the
*released* branch that we feel is solid to
> base LTS off of vs declaring a future unreleased branch as a LTS release.
>
> -Matt
>
> > On Dec 21, 2023, at 3:29 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi François,
> >
> > We discussed LTS/EOA but without com
Hi François,
We discussed LTS/EOA but without commitment yet.
The thing we agreed on is to maintain 3 branches active (so 6.0.x,
5.18.x, 5.17.x right now). The same as we do in Apache Karaf
basically. I would consider it a kind of informal LTS :)
If we need to have a concrete LTS plan, then
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release.
It's maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 6.0.x series, bringing:
- Fix Jakarta support in ActiveMQ RA
- Fix OSGi headers in activemq-jms-pool and activemq-cf
- Fix provided jetty.xml example on the SSL connector
- Fix jolokia
Hi
ActiveMQ 6.0.1 has been released
(https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/6.0.1/).
I'm working on website update and announcement right now.
However, 6.0.1 has the same JMS 3.x support as 6.0.0.
We plan to have new features implemented in 6.1.0.
Regards
JB
On Mon,
Hi Sophie
Which version are you using?
The situation is the same: no special properties on the message
(redelivery, ...) ?
Regards
JB
PS: this kind of message should be sent to the user mailing list
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 10:30 PM Sophie Borchart
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I’m running into a
Hi Bruce
I committed the Classic part and updated some sections.
By the way, we can use reporter
(https://reporter.apache.org/wizard/?activemq) for the board report
(we can create and save draft and contribute on it, then you can just
push the submit button).
Regards
JB
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at
I'm doing the "Classic" part.
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:53 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Happy new year! Best wishes in 2024!!
>
> Moments ago, we were reminded that the next ActiveMQ board report is due no
> later than Tuesday, Jan 9. This leaves less than one week, so please do
>
t the report.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:04 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bruce
> >
> > I committed the Classic part and updated some sections.
> > By the way, we can use reporter
> > (https://reporter.apache.org/wizard/?acti
It looks good to me.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:38 PM Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>
> As background, last week it was discovered (thanks Justin) that there was
> an oversight with the Exception handling over OpenWire with the upgrade to
> Jakarta apis in the 6.0.x broker.
>
t; > Just for the note, the 5.x branch will be update only for CVEs purpose?
> > (dependencies or source code)
> >
> > If so, which minor version of 5.x are in the maintenance mode? I guess
> > only the latest 5.18.x right?
> >
> > regards,
> >
ruce Snyder
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi JB,
>>>
>>> Ah, that's a great idea and would simplify the collection/submission
>>> process. Unfortunately, it looks like there's something wrong with
>>> Reporter, see the screenshot below:
>>>
>>
Hi guys,
Happy new year to all !
After the festive break, I'm back on ActiveMQ :)
I would like to discuss about the roadmap for ActiveMQ
6.0.x/6.1.x/6.2.x/7.x(future):
- For 6.0.x branch, I propose to include fixes and minor dependencies
updates (I have some PRs on the way, Matt also worked on
Severity: Medium
Affected versions:
- Apache ActiveMQ before 5.16.6
- Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.0 before 5.17.4
- Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.0 unaffected
- Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 unaffected
Description:
Once an user is authenticated on Jolokia, he can potentially trigger arbitrary
code execution.
In
Hi Abhisek
ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release is currently in voting.
It fixes the issue on ActiveMQ RAR.
It should be officially released during the weekend.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 5:18 AM Abhisek Swain
wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> Can you please update on the ETA or timelines for ActiveMQ 6.0.1
and announce the release.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:17 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1 to your vote.
>
> This release includes fixes on top of 6.0.0, especially:
> - fix Jakarta nam
Hi
I think it's really important to focus on JMS 2 complete impl for 6.1.0.
That's the most important.
I started to work on some impl, a couple are a little longer to impl,
require tests etc.
I don't think early January is reasonable. I would rather try at the
end of January.
I would rather:
1.
Hi guys,
Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1 to your vote.
This release includes fixes on top of 6.0.0, especially:
- fix Jakarta namespace in ActiveMQ RA
- fix OSGi headers in activemq-cf and activemq-jms-pool
- fix jolokia conf on Windows wrapper
- fix Jetty secure connector example
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:17 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1 to your vote.
>
> This release includes fixes on top of 6.0.0, especially:
> - fix Jakarta namespace in ActiveMQ RA
> - fix
cide how much work is done by the broker and
> where.
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:18 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > I think it would better to complete JMS 2 in 6.1.0 including shared topic
> > subscriptions.
> > We already did 6.0.x with partial JMS
h a plan of how we are going to
> > implement it. There's multiple ways it could be done and probably
> requires
> > protocol changes. We have to decide how much work is done by the broker
> and
> > where.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:18 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> &
om topic subscriptions
>
> Reference:
> https://activemq.apache.org/jms2
>
> I think this would work well, since we have Virtual Topic support (which
> is better anyway).
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
>
> > On Dec 2, 2023, at 11:00 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:29 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.32.0 release.
>
>
> I would like to highlight the following for this release:
>
>
> * Mirrored Core Messages can now be sent in their native format
> without
It sounds good to me.
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 8:48 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I'm aiming to release on Wed Morning... willing to delay a day if
> anyone needs it... (please ping me on this thread if a delay is
> needed).
>
>
> Otherwise if you get your PRs merged tomorrow
+1 (binding)
I did the same tests I did during release preparation :)
Some fixes/polish to do for 6.0.1 but nothing blocker :)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache Ac
Hi,
The first support has started in ActiveMQ 6.0.0 currently in vote.
However, some features are not fully implemented, it's planned for
6.1/6.2 releases.
For instance, regarding Shared Durable Topic, you can see some method
throwing IllegalStateException("Operation not supported by a
that come up that require us to release
> 6.1.0 much faster than shared durables or shared subs will be ready so the
> only thing we can really say is it will be available at some point in a 6.x
> release
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 8:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> >
> Riccardo Modanese
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Date: Sunday, 19 November 2023 at 17:40
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org ,
> us...@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 has been released!
> After several weeks (months ?) of work, the ActiveMQ team is pleased
After several weeks (months ?) of work, the ActiveMQ team is pleased
to announce Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release.
It's a major milestone for the project, starting the 6.x series, and bringing:
- Jakarta Messaging 3.1, JMS 2.0 support (new features will come in
the 6.x series)
- Jakarta EE namespace
Done !
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:09 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Hey JB-
>
> Sounds good! Go for it.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Nov 20, 2023, at 8:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Actuall
"Classic"
> code-base it will become the next major version of ActiveMQ.”
>
> It means will be ActiveMQ 7?
>
> [1] https://activemq.apache.org/
>
> Regards,
>
> Riccardo
>
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Date: Monday, 20 November 2023 at 09:17
> To
Hi
Actually, I'm on it as I'm starting to prepare 6.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
Give me 10mn and I will push it.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 3:52 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Heads up—
>
> I’m planning to branch main as activemq-6.0.x and then renumber main to
> 6.1.0-SNAPSHOT to support new
related PR and I will update the website with
javadoc, announcement, etc.
Then, I will do the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote !
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache Ac
Hi guys,
We found a blocker in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9388
I cancel this vote to fix and prepare a new one.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 8:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apa
Hi guys,
After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0
release to your vote.
This release is a big milestone for ActiveMQ, starting the new 6.x series.
It's the second RC where we fixed AMQ-9388 detected during the first vote.
This release includes a bunch of changes,
401 - 500 of 546 matches
Mail list logo
