Got your changes. They matched mine.
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:28:39
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 1.2.0 #3
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 14:20 -0800, Jim Gomes wrote:
I searched
+1
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue found during the last voting cycle have all been resolved
so its time to try another vote.
Now that we've fixed the issue the Voting is open once again on the
Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 1.2.0 release.
This
+1
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
Hi,
I've just cut a first release candidate for 5.3.1
Could you review the release artifacts and vote?
The list of resolved issues is here
+1
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:04:39
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Cc: Geronimo Dev List \(JIRA\)d...@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.2
Hi,
I've staged a release candidate for ActiveMQ 5.3.2. The
+1
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.3.0.
This version provides some much requested new feature like SSL support
and support for the QueueBrowser.
Changes in this version
+1
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.Stomp v1.3.0.
This version provides some much requested new feature like SSL support
and several bug fixes.
Changes in this version include:
* SSL
+1
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.comwrote:
A new release activemq-5.4.0 is out with approximately 281 issues resolved.
Please find the staging repo here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-092/
The binary distribution is
, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.comwrote:
A new release activemq-5.4.0 is out with approximately 281 issues
resolved.
Please find the staging repo here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories
+1
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
A new release activemq-5.4.0 is out with approximately 283 issues resolved.
Please find the staging repo here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-104/
The binary distribution is
+1
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:53:48
To: ActiveMQ-Developersdev@activemq.apache.org
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache.NMS API v1.4.0
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of the
I have not tried this, but the compiler seems reasonable. My understanding
is that the Silverlight runtime is not the same as the CLR 2.0. You would
need to need to compile them to target the Silverlight target runtime. Let
me know what you are able to come up with, and I can possibly look into
I have removed the references to System.Data, so that should help out
a bit. I'll take a look at the StringDictionary next. From what you
mention, we may want to look for a temporary work-around until
Microsoft ships a newer Silverlight since they are planning to support
StringDictionary
on Strings
On 29 May 2008, at 05:47, Jim Gomes wrote:
Hi Mark,
I like the idea of having providers extend the session modes to what
makes
sense for them. For instance, MSMQ may ignore transactional, but
have some
additional acknowledgment mode. However, what do you propose
Hi Mark,
I think this message is referring to BLOB messages which are
out-of-band payload messages. The normal object messages are in-band,
which means their payload actually moves through the broker. See this
link for more info: http://activemq.apache.org/blob-messages.html
I also responded
Hi Janek,
There hasn't been any plan for implementing SSL into NMS, since there hasn't
been a JIRA logged so we could schedule it into the releases. Right now, we
are working on shipping 1.0 and would not want to make such a big change
that could destabilize the code. As you mention, it would
I am in the process of creating a 1.0 release right now.
On 8/22/08, kingpin_rcs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the activemq-dotnet source repository I see no tags or branches.
I want to use a stable release but it appears that there is not one yet.
What exactly is the status of this
Yay! I can finally build again as of today.
On 8/26/08, semog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The trunk ActiveMQ 5.2 SNAPSHOT build is not working due to recent changes.
When I compile, I get the following warning:
[INFO]
Hi Gary,
I don't know anything about the ActiveMQ release process, but I will
chime-in on the version numbering. I think the three-digit numbering should
be kept. It makes things very consistent. I am not a fan of long strings
of version numbers, but I think the three digits are the minimum
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for investigating this. The trunk definitely seems to be in a bad
state. Now that I am back from vacation, I will be addressing these
problems directly.
- Jim
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Daniel Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed the latest in trunk is
Yeah, I'm not able to access it either. I am getting a 410 error: file has
been deleted. Adding it to a JIRA issue would be great.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi Dan,
Looks like the URL to the patch in your emails is not loading up for
me.
Scratch that last message. I was able to retrieve the patch by going to the
Nabble website. I couldn't link to it from the e-mail message. I'll add it
in later today.
- Jim
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Jim Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'm not able to access it either. I am
By way of semi-official announcement, trunk is back to normal. There
may still be bugs, but it should be usable.
On 11/10/08, Jim Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for investigating this. The trunk definitely seems to be in a bad
state. Now that I am back from vacation, I
Hi Matthew,
I updated the wiki so that page you referenced will get generated the
next tiime it runs.
Until then, you just need to change down one more folder level into
the 'trunk' folder before running nant. Be sure to build the
Apache.NMS module first, and then build the Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ
Hello,
There isn't a final package yet, as NMS 1.1 has not been released yet.
However, you should be able to get the latest compiled version from the
deploy sub-directory out of Subversion. I am working towards a more
standard release location that packages the assemblies together for ease of
There are currently a couple of JIRA issues related to threading issues. I
have not verified these, nor have I run across them in my own usage
patterns. However, they may be related to whatever issues you may be
experiencing. Take at look at them and see if they might help you diagnose
your
Well, I think this issue needs to be resolved. The informal vote and
preference is for List One, so I'll adjust the code to match that style.
- Jim
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:53 PM, ybronsht ybron...@progress.com wrote:
Jim, I understand your point about Oracle. First of all, we can tell that
My rule of thumb is always use openwire unless forced to use stomp. Openwire
is more compact than stomp.
--Original Message--
From: Garfield071
To: ActiveMQ Dev
ReplyTo: ActiveMQ Dev
Subject: Performance comparison between OpenWire and Stomp
Sent: Mar 5, 2009 9:37 AM
Hi,
I
There are 2 outstanding bugs logged against the 1.1 version as of this morning.
Once those are resolved a release candidate will be cut.
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Snyder bruce.sny...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:26:22
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: NMS 1.1
Sticking with the mythology theme:
+1 Charon
Charon was the ferryman and was the implicit flow control for entry into hell.
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: Colin MacNaughton colin.macnaugh...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:34:06
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: RE: ActiveMQ
the
Apache.NMS.EMS project files, you will need to provide your own copy of the
TIBCO.EMS.dll, as this is a licensed 3rd Party application.
Please report any issues or problems you have with these files.
Best,
Jim Gomes
Just to clarify, this isn't a call for a vote yet. Just merely an
announcement for preview. A vote will be called shortly.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
* ANNOUNCEMENT *
The Apache NMS 1.1.0 Release Candidate 1 is now
: Monday, June 15, 2009 10:53 AM
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: NMS 1.1.0 RC1 Available
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 07:15 -0700, Jim Gomes wrote:
* ANNOUNCEMENT *
The Apache NMS 1.1.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available at the
following
location:
http://people.apache.org
. A vote will
be taken later on whether this should be the final release.
Best,
Jim Gomes
at 07:59 -0700, Jim Gomes wrote:
* ANNOUNCEMENT *
The Apache NMS 1.1.0 Release Candidate 2 is now available at the
following
location:
http://people.apache.org/~jgomes/nms_1.1.0http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgomes/nms_1.1.0
http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgomes/nms_1.1.0
Jun 2009 10:57:33
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: NMS 1.1.0 RC2 Available
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 07:36 -0700, Jim Gomes wrote:
Thanks, Tim. Can you verify the PGP signature I generated on those files to
make sure I did it correctly? Also, do I need to generate an MD5 hash file
I think the fix sounds right. Without having looked at the code yet, would it
make sense to name the constant NULL_BYTE so it is clear how it should be used?
--Original Message--
From: matt walsh
To: ActiveMQ Dev
ReplyTo: ActiveMQ Dev
Subject: Using NMS to connect to OpenMQ via stomp
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the idea. I'm not sure what might change for next time, but I
definitely want to improve upon the automated tools I have currently. I
have been working on creating a toolset that makes things easier to generate
builds and deploy them out.
Best,
Jim
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at
, and will be published on its normal
update schedule. An announcement to the developer and user lists will be
made after the updates have been published.
- Jim Gomes
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for doing that. I think I figured out what the problem is. There
seems to be an extra file out on the website. I'm not sure where this file
came from. The bogus file is here:
http://activemq.apache.org/nms.html
This file shouldn't be there. The proper file is
OK. I deleted the bogus webpage, so we can see if it reappears. None of
the other webpages were in added to the root directory, so I think it may
have been an isolated fluke of having that file placed there.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Bruce Snyder bruce.sny...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed,
I saw that Anonymous owned item named NMS, but it is actually an
attachment. It says that it is 7Kb, but I can't seem to delete it or even
view it. If I browse the space and list all of the pages alphabetically,
there is only one page named NMS. I don't know how to clean up that
attachment.
it will
be better.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw that Anonymous owned item named NMS, but it is actually an
attachment. It says that it is 7Kb, but I can't seem to delete it or even
view it. If I browse the space and list all of the pages alphabetically
+1
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
It's been several weeks since the last Apollo beta release. Since
then several new and noteworthy features have been implementing
including:
* APLO-17 - Support message expiration
* APLO-39 -
Thanks, Hiram. Do we have a list of our project's brands and their proper
usage to use as a standard?
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.comwrote:
Hi Folks,
The Apache Board is expecting that the ActiveMQ project be compliant
with the following branding
Thanks for the info on this issue. Would you be able to enter a JIRA item
for this, along with any unit test code that exposes the problem? Having
unit tests helps us ensure we have fixed the problem and guards against any
future regressions.
Best,
Jim
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:50 PM,
Thanks for the report. It looks like we are at least leaking threads on the
InactivityMonitor. I've taken the sample provided and used it as a base to
reproduce the problem. I can reproduce a thread leak for every connection
that should have been cleaned up via Dispose(). I'll take a closer
that
parameter.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the report. It looks like we are at least leaking threads on
the InactivityMonitor. I've taken the sample provided and used it as a base
to reproduce the problem. I can reproduce a thread leak for every
+1
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.comwrote:
Hi all,I've just cut a release candidate for the 5.5.1 release.This
release is identical to the the 5.5.0 except that it fixes issue
AMQ-3491 by removing the the camel console to avoid including a LGPL
dependency
+1
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.comwrote:
Hi all,I've just cut a release candidate for the 5.4.3
release.Thisrelease is identical to the the 5.4.2 except that it fixes
issueAMQ-3491 by removing the the camel console to avoid including a
LGPLdependency in
+1
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.5.2.
New in this release:
* This release focuses on stability and performance fixes for the NMS
ActiveMQ client, no new features were added
+1
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.Stomp v1.5.2.
New in this release:
* This release focuses on stability and performance fixes for the NMS
Stomp client, the main fix in the release
This is interesting. With your work-around in place, it will eventually
connect and everything works correctly after that?
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Shine activ...@club.webhop.org wrote:
hi,
I am using the latest version of NMS to connect to an ActiveMQ Server
(version 5.5).
If you
I wouldn't have expected that sort of behavior. Very odd. Would you mind
entering this as a JIRA issue so that we can track it and get it fixed in a
future release? Here's the link: https://issues.apache.org/jira
Thanks for your help. Also, if you have a patch that fixes it, feel free
to
+1
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
I thought it would be a great time to put out another Apollo beta
release since it's picked up quite a few new features and a ton of bug
fixes.
You can find the release notes at
+1
There's a minor typo on the release page. The link text to the source zip
still shows 1.5.2. The rest looks good.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.5.3.
New in this release:
+1
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
It's been a month since the Apollo 1.0 release. I'd like to do a new 1.1
release to pickup a couple of bug fixes and features.
You can find the release notes at
+1
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.5.4.
New in this release:
* This release focuses on stability fixes for the NMS
ActiveMQ client, no new features were added in this release.
+1
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
Lots of fixes and improvement have found their way into Apollo since the
1.1 release. I've deployed a 1.2 release candidate to pickup those fixes
and improvements.
You can find the release notes
+1
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
Hi,
5.6.0 ActiveMQ release is getting closer. The build is stable and
tests look good. However we need to release activeio before it as it
contains a fix for two issues:
+1
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
Hi all,
I've just cut a release candidate for the 5.6.0 release. This is a
long-waited release with some 400 bug fixes and improvements.
It also contains a lot of new features which are summarized here:
+1
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.5.5.
New in this release:
* Sending to non-existent temp queue causes consumer to shutdown
* Consumers frequently fail to reconnect after
+1
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've deployed a 1.3 release candidate to pickup fixes since the 1.2
release. This release candidate fixes the following issues:
* [APLO-160] - Reduce memory overhead of connections.
* [APLO-188] -
+1
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of the Apache.NMS API v1.5.1.
This package contains the API for the various Apache.NMS clients along
with utility classes and unit test cases against the abstract NMS
+1 for 402.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Rob Davies rajdav...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds good to me - would also prefer more test methods run too (402)
On 26 Jul 2012, at 04:57, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I don't know about you guys but I'd rather have
+1
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.Stomp v1.5.3.
New in this release:
* This release focuses on stability fixes for issues found since the
v1.5.2 release. The release should work much
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you review the artifacts and vote?
The list of resolved issues is here:
+1
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.6.3
This is a bug fix only release focusing on some issues with Consumers in
local transacted sessions and an update to the ZLib library to
+1
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.6.4
This is a bug fix only release focusing on some issues with Consumers in
local transacted sessions where messages were getting marked as
+1
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Gary Tully gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
we need to formally vote to:
1) accept the code grant from RedHat for hornetq[1]
2) invite the active core committers (Clebert Suconic, Andy Taylor, Justin
Bertram, Youg Hao Gao, Martyn Taylor) from hornetq to
+1
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015, 8:11 AM Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
* Sigs ok
* Legal ok (almost)
- a bunch of Copyright notices pointing to 2014 or 2013 (need to
cleanup)
* Builds from source ok (almost)
There is one consistent failure in activemq-karaf-itest,
+1
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015, 8:33 AM Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.6.5
This is a small bugfix release that addresses an issue in the OpenWire
support around tight marshalling of data. Also a fix for message
+1
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015, 11:04 PM Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I gave the RC a test spin with latest Camel source code.
And the spring XSD schema 5.10.1 is included.
+1
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:10 PM, artnaseef a...@artnaseef.com wrote:
The release candidate for the
I don't think every committer should be on the PMC by default. Not all may
want that responsibility, and may not be ready for it, either. Lowering the
bar to entry may be useful, but this seems too low.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015, 7:36 AM Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
They can indicate
+1
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015, 10:34 PM Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
+1
Tested against Camel in Action source code also.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Gary Tully gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
+1
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015, 1:03 PM Gary Tully gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
release.
This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great
I don't really know the conventions of git, but are the branches still
called branches, or are they servants? Trunk/branches is a consistent
metaphor. Master/branches is mixing metaphors.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015, 1:52 PM Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On 01/05/2015 01:27 PM, Hadrian
+1
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015, 6:47 AM Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.7.0
This is first release of the Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v1.7.x line. This
release incorporates many fixes and improvements along with updates to
+1
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015, 7:00 AM Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a call for a vote on the release of the Apache.NMS API v1.7.0.
This package contains the API for the various Apache.NMS client along
with utility classes and unit test cases against the abstract NMS API.
:1.8.0_20]
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
-1
Two reasons:
1. The default configuration of localhost for the broker does not allow
connections from off-machine. For some reason, socket connections are
refused from non-local clients. I had to change
, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Another reason for not releasing this build: the destinations are not
automatically created. Server throws *ActiveMQNonExistentQueueException *when
trying to create a destination. Is this a configurable feature? If so, it
should be set to the standard ActiveMQ
: Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com
To: ActiveMQ Dev dev@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:05:55 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.0.0 (RC2)
-1
Two reasons:
1. The default configuration of localhost for the broker does not allow
connections from off-machine. For some reason
:41 AM, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Logged bug ACTIVEMQ6-106.
And at the risk of opening a big can of worms, do we need to have
Infrastructure rename the JIRA database from ACTIVEMQ6 to AMQARTEMIS or
something? I was very hesitant to enter a bug there, and had to
double-check
-1
Two reasons:
1. The default configuration of localhost for the broker does not allow
connections from off-machine. For some reason, socket connections are
refused from non-local clients. I had to change the broker.xml config to
use the machine's actual IP address, and then non-local clients
14, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
If it was done on purpose for security reasons, that's cool. However, it
is doubtful this is the way any broker will ever be run for real. The whole
purpose of a broker is to integrate disparate systems. It's like having a
web server
of
differences like this but we shouldn't let them block this first release.
Great job on kicking Artemis's tyres by the way Jim.
On 14 May 2015 19:37, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Another reason for not releasing this build: the destinations are not
automatically created. Server throws
for all of them.
On 14 May 2015 20:04, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
It's impossible to run any of the NMS unit tests with destination
autocreate set to false. If Artemis is meant to be a drop-in
replacement
(as much as possible) for ActiveMQ, then we should match feature
defaults
+0
Have no preference for any of them, but recommend going with the fewest
syllables.
On Apr 14, 2015 8:43 AM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
Now that we have chosen to give the HornetQ code donation a code name,
it's time to pick what that code name will be. Please select from
There's a difference between should and can. Is this a short term support
via deprecated and planned obsolescence, or is it long term first class
support? I don't really know much about what the HornetQ support entails.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015, 9:18 AM Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com
Must have:
Support for the Timestamp plugin, or (better) built-in equivalent. My usage
requires the ability to override timestamps on submitted messages to
correct for out of synch clocks between clients and server.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015, 8:58 AM James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
wrote:
there, already. Is that correct?
On Apr 15, 2015 11:20 AM, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would say it's a short term for older clients being able to connect
via deprecated.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Jim Gomes jgo...@apache.org wrote:
There's a difference between
Sounds good. Thanks for the update, Clebert!
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015, 1:36 PM Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's hard to come up with a time.. it only depends on users. We
need to make proper announcements at the hornetq community first and
talk to users there about that.
I'm OK with moving JIRA notices to a separate list.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015, 1:22 PM Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
Do we need an official vote thread for these kinds of changes?
Perhaps this discussion thread is good enough?
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:14 PM, James Carman
+1 for lazy consensus.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015, 1:44 PM James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
wrote:
Sounds good. There's no reason to rush this by any stretch of the
imagination. Lazy consensus is just fine for this sort of thing, I'd
think.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Hiram Chirino
I'm with Guillaume on this. From the NMS perspective, the broker already is
a plugin implementation. I don't understand why it would need to go any
deeper than that. NMS can talk to TIBCO or ActiveMQ brokers via one common
API. The idea of pluggable brokers already exists.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015,
for everything.
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Jim Gomes jgo...@apache.org wrote:
I'm with Guillaume on this. From the NMS perspective, the broker already
is
a plugin implementation. I don't understand why it would need to go any
deeper than that. NMS can talk to TIBCO or ActiveMQ brokers via
as to the purpose and intent of the
Board Reports being published on the wiki?
Best,
Jim
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Apr 9, 2015, at 1:02 PM, Jim Gomes jgo...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the link, Dan. I didn't know those were there. I think the
main
Thanks, Tim. That is a clear and compelling reason to keep them there.
With that clarified, does anyone have any comments on the renaming of the
pages to improve the indexing?
Best,
Jim
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/09/2015 02:13 PM, Jim Gomes
I recently went out to look at previous Board Reports (
http://activemq.apache.org/apache-activemq-board-reports.html) and found
the current sorting method difficult to deal with. Unless we are required
to use the page naming format, I would like to change it to the following
format:
Apache
gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
renaming makes sense to me.
On 9 Apr 2015 19:44, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Tim. That is a clear and compelling reason to keep them there.
With that clarified, does anyone have any comments on the renaming of the
pages to improve the indexing
AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
No objection, but why don't we just delete the page and point at the
official records:
https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/ActiveMQ.html
Dan
On Apr 9, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Jim Gomes jgo...@apache.org wrote:
I recently went out to look
101 - 200 of 905 matches
Mail list logo
