As I said on the Voting Thread. Rest is an independent maven
component. Users have to consume it from maven on their own Rest
application.
So, they can still keep doing it from a previous release until they
decide to not use it any more:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4229
>> Although I don't
think anybody wants to invest the resources to bring all the dependencies
up-to-date. <<
until someone does that, I think it should be out.
this is pretty much abandonware.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:04 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> I've been meaning to get to this for
I've been meaning to get to this for awhile. Better late than never, right?
Generally speaking, I agree that REST is not a great fit for messaging.
Whenever folks ask about it on the mailing lists, Slack, Stack Overflow,
etc. I strongly encourage them for two main reasons:
- The STOMP protocol
@Matt no problem at all.. just making it clear...
And I am actually conflicted if there would be value in bringing it to
artemis. If there would be any extra features to be developed?
I don't honestly "believe" in rest over messaging the API gets
too stateful to my taste.that's why I'm
Hey Clebert-
Yeah, I was just addressing Lucas’ question from earlier in the thread re
removing from ActiveMQ 5.
-Matt
> On Sep 13, 2022, at 9:27 AM, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> I'm not suggesting we remove it.. just if there is value in bringing
> it to artemis.
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022
I'm not suggesting we remove it.. just if there is value in bringing
it to artemis.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 10:24 AM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> The REST service in ActiveMQ 5 is actively used, and should not be removed.
> If there are bugs or issues, please file a JIRA.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
The REST service in ActiveMQ 5 is actively used, and should not be removed. If
there are bugs or issues, please file a JIRA.
Thanks,
Matt Pavlovich
> On Sep 12, 2022, at 3:58 PM, Tetreault, Lucas
> wrote:
>
> Should we remove REST from ActiveMQ "Classic" as well? I think the same
>
Question now: should we have someone bringing the rest from AMQ5 into
Artemis? Is there any value on converting it to artemis?
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 9:53 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> If there is value on the rest from activemq 5. I would rather bring that one
> to artemis instead of keeping
If there is value on the rest from activemq 5. I would rather bring that
one to artemis instead of keeping the one we had.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 8:12 PM Tetreault, Lucas
wrote:
> > Do the reasons for removal are the same as those presented at the
> beginning of this thread?
> No, probably not
>
> How can we analyze usage?
Agree, that's an interesting question. On the top of my head, and without
knowing activemq.apache.org website infrastructure details, it would be
interesting to get overall traffic stats from the page
https://activemq.apache.org/rest . That at least will give us
> Do the reasons for removal are the same as those presented at the beginning
> of this thread?
No, probably not all the same reasons but it seems to me that there is some
value in keeping the two brokers in sync. Especially since some of the
arguments in support of removing it are "I don't
>
> Should we remove REST from ActiveMQ "Classic" as well?
Do the reasons for removal are the same as those presented at the beginning
of this thread?
As far as I understand, REST from ActiveMQ Classis it´s working. My two
cents is that the usage of the https://activemq.apache.org/rest should
Should we remove REST from ActiveMQ "Classic" as well? I think the same
arguments apply about it being abandonware, etc.
We could deprecate it in the upcoming 5.18.0 release and use this as incentive
to cut a 6.0.0 release? __ That would be exciting!
- Lucas
On 2022-09-12, 7:41 AM,
Yeah that's the tricky part, I'm not sure how doable it is but figured if
it was ever going to be looked at then a major version change would be the
time to re-visit.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 1:03 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> We will have to find a way to comply with older clients though. We can
We will have to find a way to comply with older clients though. We can
break the API but compatibility with older clients has always been
respected.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:54 AM Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>
> If you are going to move to version 3.0 it would be a nice time to look at
> things
If you are going to move to version 3.0 it would be a nice time to look at
things to fix that are breaking changes like the spec violations I pointed
out in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1262 . The issue has
been around for at least 5 years when I opened the Jira. I didn't see a
I will go ahead and remove it...
I will also bump upstream/main as 3.0 as part of the removal.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:24 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I didn’t meant to imply I was going to remove it now
>
> I intend to do it on Monday. If no objection.
>
>
> Although keeping it means we
I didn’t meant to imply I was going to remove it now
I intend to do it on Monday. If no objection.
Although keeping it means we would have to fix it. I honestly don’t see
many options to keep it.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 1:09 PM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> While I'm fine with it going I'd maybe
While I'm fine with it going I'd maybe give other folks more of chance
to reply...or at least use lay concensus style 'ill do it at if
noone objects' :)
On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 17:48, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
> I will go ahead and remove it...
>
>
> to be honest I don't believe much in rest from
I will go ahead and remove it...
to be honest I don't believe much in rest from JMS due to the session
and stateful nature.
But if we were to provide REST for our users, I would rather bring the
servlet from AMQ5. it would be a major task anyway... and this
module has to go for sure.
On
It has looked to be rotting for a long time, and requires various user
hoop jumping I dont expect many/any folks are interested in doingI
think removing it makes sense.
On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 14:54, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if there's much to discuss here. Rest in Artemis has
I'm not sure if there's much to discuss here. Rest in Artemis has been
abandonware for a while (like 5 years)... The jboss-rest interface is
a few major releases behind, the module compiles but it's not
functional, and any time someone ask questions we just mention don't
use it... (favoring stomp
22 matches
Mail list logo
