Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Python 3.11 support merged for Apache Airflow

2023-05-22 Thread Daniel Standish
Congrats  On Mon, May 22, 2023, 3:54 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am glad to announce that I just merged > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27264 that implements Python 3.11 > support for Airflow. > > Python 3.11 brings a number of speed improvements for single-threaded

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Python 3.11 support merged for Apache Airflow

2023-05-22 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hello everyone, I am glad to announce that I just merged https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27264 that implements Python 3.11 support for Airflow. Python 3.11 brings a number of speed improvements for single-threaded Python use-case. It took a long time (Python 3.11 had been released in

[VOTE] (extended) on AIP-50 (part 2) to finalize it

2023-05-22 Thread Scheffler Jens (XC-DX/ETV5)
Hi Airflow-Developers, It is not democracy if nobody makes a vote. I don't want to be a "dictator" but still propose Option B. As nobody responded until today, I am extending the vote until tomorrow, 23. May 2023 22:00 CEST for everybody expressing a binding or non-binding opinion. Mit

[ANNOUNCE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 19, 2023 are released

2023-05-22 Thread Elad Kalif
Dear Airflow community, I'm happy to announce that new versions of Airflow Providers packages were just released. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-airbyte/3.3.0/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-alibaba/2.4.0/

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Change in self-hosted vs. public runners for CI jobs

2023-05-22 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hello everyone, *TL;DR; Our CI should become a bit more stable, cheaper and snappier to run. * *But committers need to be a bit more careful when rebasing PRs from the GitHub UI.* I just merged a change https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31451 that should improve the stability of PRs -

[RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - May 19, 2023

2023-05-22 Thread Elad Kalif
Hello, Apache Airflow Providers (based on RC2) have been accepted. 3 "+1" binding votes received: - Elad Kalif (binding) - Jarek Potiuk (binding) - Jed Cunningham (binding) 3 "+1" non-binding votes received: - Pankaj Koti - Pankaj Singh - Hussein Awala *Important note:* Bugs were found in

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 19, 2023

2023-05-22 Thread Jed Cunningham
+1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, licences.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.6.1 from 2.6.1rc1

2023-05-22 Thread Ephraim Anierobi
Hello, Apache Airflow Python Client 2.6.1 (based on RC1) has been accepted. 4 "+1" binding votes received: - Ephraim Anierobi - Jarek Potiuk - Pierre Jeambrun - Elad Kalif 4 "+1" non-binding votes received: - Pankaj Singh - Hussein Awala - Pankaj Koti - Phani Kumar Vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.6.1 from 2.6.1rc1

2023-05-22 Thread Ephraim Anierobi
Thank you Pierre Jeambrun and Pankaj Singh for reporting the 2.6.0 source that got into 2.6.1. I addressed the source of this issue in the PR: https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/pull/81 some days back and that ensures it doesn't happen again On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 09:07, Phani Kumar

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.6.1 from 2.6.1rc1

2023-05-22 Thread Phani Kumar
+1 non-binding On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 1:15 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Verified that installing the package from the RC works well, triggered an > example DAG using the client and saw that it worked fine. > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.6.1 from 2.6.1rc1

2023-05-22 Thread Pankaj Koti
+1 (non-binding) Verified that installing the package from the RC works well, triggered an example DAG using the client and saw that it worked fine. Regards, Pankaj Koti *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. Location: Pune, India Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) Email: