I hope more voices will be coming soon as well :).
Constance - few words of explanation, for my "remove" things. I do not say
we "have to" remove those things or even that we "should".
My main motivation for mentioning the list is that we often forget that
when we have a new major version of
+1 non-binding
--
Regards,
Aritra Basu
On Thu, May 9, 2024, 10:36 AM Amogh Desai wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 10:29 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> > Short reminder and correction :).
> >
> > Wei Lee - as a committer, your vote is binding for
+1 binding
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 10:29 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Short reminder and correction :).
>
> Wei Lee - as a committer, your vote is binding for any votes except
> releases. Releases are special - they are a legal act of the
> Apache Software Foundation,
Short reminder and correction :).
Wei Lee - as a committer, your vote is binding for any votes except
releases. Releases are special - they are a legal act of the
Apache Software Foundation, so when you vote on releases, only PMC votes
are binding.
Generally "releasing software" is what the ASF
+1 (binding)
On Thursday, May 9, 2024, Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, 9 May 2024, 08:17 Wei Lee, wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > > On May 9, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Phani Kumar INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 binding, looking forward to add Scarf
> > >
>
+1 (binding)
On Thu, 9 May 2024, 08:17 Wei Lee, wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On May 9, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Phani Kumar
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 binding, looking forward to add Scarf
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 7:42 AM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Discussion
+1 (binding)
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 4:47 AM Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On May 9, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Phani Kumar
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 binding, looking forward to add Scarf
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 7:42 AM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Discussion
+1 non-binding
Best,
Wei
> On May 9, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Phani Kumar
> wrote:
>
> +1 binding, looking forward to add Scarf
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 7:42 AM Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Discussion thread:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/7f6qyr8w2n8w34g63s7ybhzphgt8h43m
>>
>> I
+1 binding, looking forward to add Scarf
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 7:42 AM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/7f6qyr8w2n8w34g63s7ybhzphgt8h43m
>
> I would like to officially call for a vote to add Scarf as a Telemetry
> tool. Some other things:
>
>
Hi all,
Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/7f6qyr8w2n8w34g63s7ybhzphgt8h43m
I would like to officially call for a vote to add Scarf as a Telemetry
tool. Some other things:
- Opt-in by default
- Explicit documentation that we collect the telemetry data
- Opt-out via
Hey All,
Here are the minutes, recording, and deck from our May 8th Airflow Town
Hall! <
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jHtWFGgfUNyH1CHsQDc_90_V0Sx98gFofVr0FiMcMBA/edit?usp=sharing
>
I'm grateful to Wei Lee, Bowrna Prabharakaran, Jens Scheffler, Bartosz
Jankiewicz, Jana Polianskaja, Michael
Thanks for engaging.
I don't think I need to go to a lazy consensus vote so I won't unless
someone thinks necessary.
The PR is now ready for review if anyone is interested:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39336
It was made more tricky by the fact that "backfill" is literally a second
Like Constance and many others, there was time needed to process this
fantastical summary and approach to Airflow 3. __
A lot of the points raised by Jarek make sense, ie being prescriptive on what
features we want to be there on Day 1 vs launched on 3.x - this does allow us
to move quickly
13 matches
Mail list logo
