RE: [PROPOSAL] Adding MSGraphSDK Async Operator to Airflow

2024-03-12 Thread Blain David
Alright that's good news thanks Jarek :) -Original Message- From: Jarek Potiuk Sent: Monday, 11 March 2024 18:31 To: dev@airflow.apache.org Cc: Bienvenu Joffrey Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding MSGraphSDK Async Operator to Airflow EXTERNAL MAIL: Indien je de afzender van deze e-mail niet

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding MSGraphSDK Async Operator to Airflow

2024-03-11 Thread Jarek Potiuk
triggerer and operator, with the > particularity it only works in async (e.g. deferred) mode. > > What do you think? > > Kind regards, > David > > -Original Message- > From: Jarek Potiuk > Sent: Sunday, 10 March 2024 18:19 > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > Cc: Bie

RE: [PROPOSAL] Adding MSGraphSDK Async Operator to Airflow

2024-03-11 Thread Blain David
o a point > that the MSGraphSDKOperator could be based on the refactored > HttpOperator, in the meantime it would be nice if the operator would > be already available in Airflow > > What do you guys think? > > Kind regards, > David > > > -Original Message- >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding MSGraphSDK Async Operator to Airflow

2024-03-10 Thread Jarek Potiuk
phSDKOperator could be based on the refactored HttpOperator, in > the meantime it would be nice if the operator would be already available in > Airflow > > What do you guys think? > > Kind regards, > David > > > -Original Message- > From: Jarek Potiuk > Sent

RE: [PROPOSAL] Adding MSGraphSDK Async Operator to Airflow

2024-02-29 Thread Blain David
: Friday, 26 January 2024 17:25 To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding MSGraphSDK Async Operator to Airflow [You don't often get email from ja...@potiuk.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] EXTERNAL MAIL: Indien je de afzender van

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding MSGraphSDK Async Operator to Airflow

2024-01-26 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hey David - any comments on that ? On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 1:07 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > Hi David, > > Thanks for raising this discussion. > following the protocol established about accepting new providers - > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding MSGraphSDK Async Operator to Airflow

2024-01-15 Thread Elad Kalif
Hi David, Thanks for raising this discussion. following the protocol established about accepting new providers - https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/PROVIDERS.rst#accepting-new-community-providers My main concern here is how will provide ongoing mantaince for this provider? This provider

[PROPOSAL] Adding MSGraphSDK Async Operator to Airflow

2024-01-13 Thread Blain David
Hello everyone, I've already started a discussion about this on the Airflow discussions: https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/36315 As we have multiple DAG's interacting with MS Graph API endpoints, and as we want to avoid custom code as much as possible as we have to handle lot's of