I would like to propose changing the package scope from @annotator to
@apache-annotator. I believe this has two advantages:
- Consistent branding that I believe aligns well with the distribution
guidelines [1]
- Alignment with prior art from the Apache Arrow project [2]
If there are no objection
tilgovi commented on issue #89:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/89#issuecomment-695712549
Closed by bb78bd5.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, plea
tilgovi closed issue #89:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/89
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
tilgovi closed issue #90:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/90
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
tilgovi commented on issue #90:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/90#issuecomment-695419350
Closed by #94.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please l
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 October 2020.
The report for your podling will form a part of the
tilgovi merged pull request #94:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/pull/94
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
tilgovi commented on pull request #94:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/pull/94#issuecomment-695412156
I believe we do want the types and the dependencies. Even just importing
things leads to the build having babel import helpers from the runtime package.
We may not need
