On Wed, 14 May 2003, David Thielen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another feature request - the ability to set the jre for a junit
test.
That's what junit's jvm attribute does.
Stefan
On Thu, 15 May 2003 12:56 am, peter reilly wrote:
I have merged the ant-type code into my antlib code.
However it uses a magic attribute name ant-type to
achieve the effect and not as discussed before - the
namesspaced attribute name like - ant:type.
I can easily do a name-spaced attribute
On Thursday 15 May 2003 07:56, Conor MacNeill wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2003 12:56 am, peter reilly wrote:
I have merged the ant-type code into my antlib code.
However it uses a magic attribute name ant-type to
achieve the effect and not as discussed before - the
namesspaced attribute name
antoine 2003/05/15 04:30:27
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks mail.html
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/email EmailTask.java
Mailer.java MimeMailer.java PlainMailer.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/listener MailLogger.java
This is true, but difficult to do. Some of the implementations of the
different features change/improve if other features are present. For
example the implementation of onerror uses the new anttypedefintion
class. The implementation of the psuedo task antlib uses the add(Type)
mechanism rather
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19829.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2003/05/15 05:22:48
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/email Mailer.java
Log:
2003
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +1 -1
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/email/Mailer.java
Index: Mailer.java
bodewig 2003/05/15 05:44:01
Modified:.WHATSNEW
docs/manual/CoreTasks javac.html
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Javac.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/compilers
DefaultCompilerAdapter.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19826.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19765.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19953.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19959.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19964.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Any chance to get the available task a bit extended so
that it can also be used to check for methods, fields,
implemented interfaces etc. and specific properties...
Doesn't sound too hard. I wouldn't augment available with it but
rather create a new condition, though.
Any
The fact that the meaning of available was overloaded in the past doesn't
mean we should continue doing so... And still, available currently looks for
files/streams (on file-system, classpath, path, etc...), which is quite
different than looking for particular characteristic of whatever's
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19967.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dominique Devienne wrote:
The fact that the meaning of available was overloaded in the past doesn't
mean we should continue doing so... And still, available currently looks for
files/streams (on file-system, classpath, path, etc...), which is quite
different than looking for particular
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19829.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18633.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
20 matches
Mail list logo