Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

2021-10-07 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 15:48, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > Please not that the ASF nor its projects release Binaries. > (They are provided to users as a convenience) > We also do not vote on releases based on Binaries. > > The vote should be based on whether or not the 'source' - that > is being

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

2021-10-07 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 16:27, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > > On 07/10/21 11:27 am, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > > If the goal of 1.10.12 is to be compilable on Java 17, > > This 1.10.12 release of Ant (like our previous releases) is a bug fix > release. Ant 1.10.x require a Java 8+ runtime. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

2021-10-07 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 07/10/21 11:27 am, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: If the goal of 1.10.12 is to be compilable on Java 17, This 1.10.12 release of Ant (like our previous releases) is a bug fix release. Ant 1.10.x require a Java 8+ runtime. This release changes nothing on that front. One of the bug fixes in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

2021-10-07 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Hello Paul, On 05/10/21 2:27 pm, Paul King wrote: I was surprised to see binary jars in the src archives under lib/optional. I don't know the history, so perhaps it is fine. Thank you for testing this release. I had a look at our previous releases and they too contain the binary jars in the