Re: xor condition

On 2011-07-17, Matt Benson wrote: > Currently each nested condition is xor'd against the cumulative result, thus: > xor(true, false) == true > xor(true, false, true) == false > xor(true, false, true, false) == false > Is this correct? It would seem that semantically an xor over multiple > neste

Re: ant fails on gump

On 2011-05-09, Ludmila Shikhvarg wrote: > build: >[mkdir] Created dir: /export/home/dtftest/gump/results/ant/build/classes >[javac] Compiling 764 source files to > /export/home/dtftest/gump/results/ant/build/classes >[javac] > /export/home/dtftest/gump/results/ant/src/main/org/apache

Re: Has anyone got any thoughts (positive or negative) about this?

On 2011-04-05, Kevin Jackson wrote: > http://code.google.com/p/winant/ I've seen it come up in some searches but never looked into it. > I'm just looking at html5boilerplate and the build script is IMHO > fairly standard for a none build person and I came across this > reference to an 'installer

Re: [PATCH] Ant faq.xml

On 2011-03-30, Gilbert Rebhan wrote: > Original Message > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ant faq.xml > From: Stefan Bodewig > To: dev@ant.apache.org > Date: Wed Mar 30 2011 17:54:47 GMT+0200 (CET) >> On 2011-03-24, Gilbert Rebhan wrote: >>> Patchfile, see

Re: [PATCH] Ant faq.xml

On 2011-03-24, Gilbert Rebhan wrote: > Patchfile, see attached file : patchfile.txt For some reasons my MUA doesn't see the contents of attachments when sent to Apache lists. I've tried to reproduce the patchfile from the raw email's content, you may want to double check whether what is visible

Re: [ANT4DOCBOOK] V0.2.0

On 2011-03-27, Benjamin de Dardel wrote: > Could you please add this projet to the External Tools and Tasks ? Done. Your link looked a little strange > href="http://ant4docbook.sourceforge.net/"> I think I've fixed it. Stefan ---

Re: Committing to antlib sandbox

On 2011-03-06, Kevin Jackson wrote: > Am I supposed to checkout each antlib independently That's how I do it. Honestly I never expected people wanted to check out all-trunks at all. The scripts that are there to create or promote antlibs expect that you have checked out the antlibs individually

Re: Gump, VFS and Ivy

On 2011-03-04, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > this reminds me that on my day project we are using a home made VFS > provider based upon jackrabbit. VFS has moved on to VFS2 in a new package and is ramping up for a release IIUC. I think it now uses jackrabbit's libs for WebDAV. Stefan --

Gump, VFS and Ivy

Hi, a chain starting with commons-net removing a deprecated method has now led to Gump removing the commons-vfs 1.x builds. Ivy is one of two projects in Gump that depend on VFS so I have added the jar of VFS 1.0 as a packaged dependency. Ivy's descriptor also lists a dependency on commons-vfs-s

Re: test failures in gump

On 2011-03-02, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > On top of that I tried to make sense of the error message of > replacetokens-test.xml (below) but I do not get it ... > Regards, > Antoine > au:antunit] Build File: > /srv/gump/public/workspace/ant/src/tests/antunit/filters/replacetokens-test.xml >

Re: Website and svnpubsub

On 2011-03-01, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > I don't know much about Anakia, but would it handle correctly renamed > paged ? Would it correctly delete the html files corresponding to the > removed xdoc pages ? We don't remove or rename pages ;-) The whole internet would collapse if people suddenly sta

Re: Ant test failures in gump

On 2011-03-01, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > OK I have done "something". Thank you. I have tweaked a few things and am just running the full testsuite on my windows box where problems with undeleteable jars tend to show up. > I have seen that the java resources like ${java:foo!foo.properties} i

Re: Website and svnpubsub

On 2011-02-28, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Additionally, we could open a discussion about whether packaging the > website in the ant distribution is a good idea or whether we should > avoid it because among other issues the website announces the release > date which is not known with certainty a

Re: Website and svnpubsub

On 2011-02-28, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > Finally I looked myself into how the Apache CMS works and how could > our website edition and publication could be similar or integrated. Great, thanks. > So basically it is about having somewhere in svn the sources of the > website. A buildbot job then ta

Re: Ant test failures in gump

On 2011-02-28, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > I see now that in fact there are still 21 antunit tests failing in gump > (see [1] and [2] below) : > Do we want to add a work entry in gump metadata for each of the > directories where these tests create classes or resources ? > Or do we want to someh

Re: Failing test-ant and test-ant-no-xerces since Feb 1st

On 2011-02-27, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2011-02-26, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: >> Now gump is failing for lack of ${java.io.tmpdir}/test.jar on the classpath. > Which Gump instance is that? I don't see this on vmgump right now but a > failure in replacetokens-test.x

Re: Failing test-ant and test-ant-no-xerces since Feb 1st

On 2011-02-26, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > Now gump is failing for lack of ${java.io.tmpdir}/test.jar on the classpath. Which Gump instance is that? I don't see this on vmgump right now but a failure in replacetokens-test.xml. > Is is possible to add to > the ant.xml descriptor ? java.io.tm

Re: Failing test-ant and test-ant-no-xerces since Feb 1st

On 2011-02-25, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Following up on a thread on gump mailing list. [1] > The change that you mentioned in your earlier email is likely this one [2]: > r1061156 | bodewig | 2011-01-20 03:25:35 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2011) | 1 line > Give build.sysclasspath a chance to influenc

Re: svn commit: r1066963 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools: ant/ ant/taskdefs/ ant/taskdefs/cvslib/ ant/taskdefs/email/ ant/taskdefs/optional/ ant/taskdefs/optional/depend/ ant/taskdefs/o

On 2011-02-25, Jon Stevens wrote: > I guess this brings up a bigger issue (again) which is when will we > modernize Ant? Oh, we just did. Ant 1.8.x dropped Java 1.3 ;-) It's been our community that didn't want to take a bigger step forward. > java4 and java5 have been EOL'd... so maybe ant 2.0

Re: svn commit: r1066963 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools: ant/ ant/taskdefs/ ant/taskdefs/cvslib/ ant/taskdefs/email/ ant/taskdefs/optional/ ant/taskdefs/optional/depend/ ant/taskdefs/o

On 2011-02-18, Kevin Jackson wrote: > Interesting discussion - I tried to introduce some micro-optimizations > (pretty much like these) into the Tomcat codebase 8 years ago, but was > met with 'meh why bother?' responses as the thinking was that the vm > would pretty much make optimizations pointl

Re: Infrastructure Needs

On 2011-02-16, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > Le 15 févr. 2011 à 22:09, ant elder a écrit : >> Its good to avoid concepts like lead developer in Apache projects so >> often for things like Jira new projects use names like " >> Developers" and the dev list email address, eg >> https://issues.apache.org/

Re: svn commit: r1066963 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools: ant/ ant/taskdefs/ ant/taskdefs/cvslib/ ant/taskdefs/email/ ant/taskdefs/optional/ ant/taskdefs/optional/depend/ ant/taskdefs/o

On 2011-02-04, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 02/04/2011 09:03 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: >> I did not know that using a final variable for the upper bound of a loop >> instead of something.size() makes a difference in terms of performance. > Generally the preferred idiom is to use an iterator, A

Re: svn commit: r1066963 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools: ant/ ant/taskdefs/ ant/taskdefs/cvslib/ ant/taskdefs/email/ ant/taskdefs/optional/ ant/taskdefs/optional/depend/ ant/taskdefs/o

On 2011-02-04, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Hello Stefan, > I did not know that using a final variable for the upper bound of a > loop instead of something.size() makes a difference in terms of > performance. Interesting. > I just read the original bug report "Project.fireMessageLoggedEvent > p

[RESULT][VOTE] Second Attempt to Release .NET Antlib 1.1

Hi, the vote passed with six +1s (Conor, Peter, Kevin, Antoine, Bruce and myself) and I have already copied over the files. I'll send out the announce email after giving the mirrors a bit of time to catch up. Stefan - To unsubs

Re: EasyAnt Accepted for Incubation

On 2011-02-01, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > Le 1 févr. 2011 à 09:53, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : >> Once there is anything to link to I plan to add a small news blurb to >> the Ant site - or ask Nicolas or Xavier to do so since you likely know >> more aboth the project than me.

EasyAnt Accepted for Incubation

Hi, just a quick note for those who don't follow the incubator general list: the vote on incubationg EasyAnt has passed and infrastructure is about to be set up. Once there is anything to link to I plan to add a small news blurb to the Ant site - or ask Nicolas or Xavier to do so since you likely

Re: [VOTE] Second Attempt to Release .NET Antlib 1.1

On 2011-01-28, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I hereby call for a vote to release these files as Apache .NET Ant > Library 1.1. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

[VOTE] Second Attempt to Release .NET Antlib 1.1

Hi, after fixing the NOTICE file and applying the trademark policy I've rebuilt the distribution from svn revision 1064451 of Tarballs at , Maven artifacts at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache .NET Ant Library 1.1

On 2011-01-27, Maarten Coene wrote: > I've noticed that the year is not correct in the NOTICE file. It > should be 2011 instead of 2006. Absolutely, thank you. I grepped for 2010 but was too optimistic WRT when the files were changed for the last time. Stefan --

[VOTE-CANCELED] Release Apache .NET Ant Library 1.1

As Maarten pointed out the NOTICE file is bad, I'll re-roll the release but will take the time to fix an issue I encountered with the ivy.xml/POM creation part of antlib/common first. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache .NET Ant Library 1.1

On 2011-01-27, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I'm now calling for a vote to release them as version 1.1 of the .NET > Antlib. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-

[VOTE] Release Apache .NET Ant Library 1.1

Hi, I've built distribution files from svn revision 1063847 of , the source and binary distributions are at and the Maven artifacts at

Re: ResourceExists condition

On 2011-01-25, Matt Benson wrote: > On Jan 25, 2011, at 4:25 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2011-01-25, wrote: >>> Added: >>> >>> ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/ResourceExists.java >>>(with props) >>

ResourceExists condition (was Re: svn commit: r1063181 - in /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk: ./ docs/ src/etc/testcases/ src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/ src/tests/junit/org/apache/ant/antunit/)

On 2011-01-25, wrote: > Added: > > ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/ResourceExists.java > (with props) This is a plain ant condition with no dependency on AntUnit that might be useful in core Ant as well. I added it to AntUnit rather than Ant's trunk so that we

Thinking about a .NET Antlib Release

Hi all, the last (and so far only) release of the .NET Antlib occured more than four years ago. Since then a few bugfixes have accumulated in svn and even two new tasks have been added.[1] Last week a bug report was raised (and the corresponding bug has been fixed in svn for more than a year) so

Re: [VOTE] third attempt - release of ant 1.8.2

On 2010-12-20, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > The first release candidate of ant 1.8.2 got several binding +1s and a > -1 concerning an issue with the use of the JUnit task with selective > methods and JUnit 4 style coding [1]. > So I addressed these concerns and rebuilt a release candidate. Than

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.2

On 2010-12-20, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > Because of the fact that a single -1 makes the vote result negative, I haven't counted the votes but still want to point out that releases are majority votes and can't be vetoed. Since I voted non-+1 on an IvyDE release a while back it has become impo

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.2

On 2010-12-15, Paul King wrote: > This is probably enough to reproduce it: Yes, it is, thank you Paul. > > > > > > > > The error message is created by the forked Ant process, not the one executing the build file. You would see the same if you used ant -Dbar=${b

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.2

On 2010-12-15, Paul King wrote: > After a little more testing, one thing I did notice was an > apparent stricter treatment of property expansion. > With 1.8.1, having an arg to a forked java task like this: > > was happily ignored if skipFetch wasn't defined. > With 1.8.2, we now get a failed b

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.2

On 2010-12-13, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > as announced I have built a release candidate for Ant 1.8.2. > This is available for download from http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ > Do you want to release these artefacts as Apache Ant 1.8.2 ? > Yes [X] > No [] +1 Stefan

Re: release announcement text

On 2010-12-13, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > - performance improvements in directory scanning > - XSLT task honors classpath again (bugrep 49271) > - distinction between core tasks and optional tasks is abolished > - numerous bug fixes and improvements as documented in Bugzilla > and in WH

Re: svnpubsub for the Ant and Ivy sites

On 2010-12-13, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > So I suggest that we say to the infra team that our sites are there: > * https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/trunk/docs/ > * https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/site/target/ > and in our workflow we skip the last part of going on people.a.o and sv

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project ivy-tests (in module ivy) failed

On 2010-12-13, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > If it happens again, do we have rights to commit there ? Yes, every ASF committer has full access to Gump's metadata. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For a

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project ivy-tests (in module ivy) failed

On 2010-12-13, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > The build is failing because now some ant task in the build needs > ant-contrib. OK, now I see it, thank you. > From what I understand from Gump, it is intended to test the projects > interdependencies and backward compatibility. Then about the > integrati

Re: Ant 1.8.2 build next week

On 2010-12-10, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > if no one objects, I would like to build ant 1.8.2 next week, likely > on Monday (12/13), so the official release would then be 12/20. Sounds good. > I have seen various nags of people who have entered bug reports [1] > [2] in Bugzilla and would like

Re: Bug 50200, VectorSet kills the performance of DirectoryScanner

On 2010-12-13, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Hi, > I got a private email asking me to apply the patch suggested by > *Bug 50200* - [1] > VectorSet kills the performance of DirectoryScanner > The code looks good and I am wondering w

Re: Perforce Ant Tasks

On 2010-12-09, Jan Matèrne wrote: > I just noticed [1 (DE)] that Perforce now comes with its own tasks [2]. Good for their users and good for Ant. > Should we keep our P4 tasks or give it up? (= moving to attic or deleting > and having in the SVN history). I think they are part of the "move to

Re: [PATCH] ant-core/docs/manual/Tasks/taskdef.html

On 2010-11-29, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-11-23, Kevin Connor Arpe wrote: >> Regarding the namespace issue, no one I talked to at my office knew >> anything about classloaders. I wasn't sure how to describe it, but I >> don't want users to need to be a Jav

Re: [PATCH] ant-core/docs/manual/Tasks/taskdef.html

On 2010-11-23, Kevin Connor Arpe wrote: > Seems like my patch should be merged with the typedef page. I thought so, > Regarding the namespace issue, no one I talked to at my office knew > anything about classloaders. I wasn't sure how to describe it, but I > don't want users to need to be a Jav

Re: Building AntUnit

On 2010-11-23, Jan Matèrne wrote: > I tried to build AntUnit. > But the first problem is that you must have JUnit on the compile classpath. > This is not part of Ant and there is no target for downloading that. > So I thought about enhancing the common/ivy.xml for running ivy > - downloading the

Re: Ivy site

On 2010-11-18, Maarten Coene wrote: > within a few hours, an updated Ivy site should be online where the > general part should fulfill most of the requirements listed here: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs Thank you Maarten, this looks good. > I didn't update the documentation belon

Re: svn commit: r1039400 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs: ExecTask.java Execute.java Property.java optional/Rpm.java optional/jdepend/JDependTask.java optional/junit/JUnitT

On 2010-11-26, wrote: > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1039400&view=rev > Log: > provide a Map based method to access environment variables and use that I've later change the log message to also point out that System.getenv won't be used on OpenVMS because of the logicals magic. > -

Re: [PATCH] ant-core/docs/manual/Tasks/taskdef.html

On 2010-11-15, Kevin Connor Arpe wrote: > As promised, I would commit back a patch. In this case, docs are the > right solution. Thank you Kevin. > I have upgraded the TaskDef Task docs. Much of what you've added is already present on the typedef page - maybe we should make it clearer that tas

[RESULT] [IP-CLEARANCE] Bushel Donation to Apache Ant

Hi, it's been almost 90 hours since I started the thread, I haven't seen any -1s and even two +1s (thanks Mohammad and Siegfried). So by lazy consensus the process has finished successfully and Bushel can be imported. Thanks Stefan --

Re: Can Anybody Fix our Logos?

On 2010-11-17, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-11-17, Bruce Atherton wrote: >> I'd have to go back in the archives, but I have a pretty clear >> recollection that while we had asked for a vector format for the logo >> after the contest winner was announced, none was av

Re: Can Anybody Fix our Logos?

On 2010-11-17, Bruce Atherton wrote: > I'd have to go back in the archives, but I have a pretty clear > recollection that while we had asked for a vector format for the logo > after the contest winner was announced, none was available. Quite possible, I don't find one in my own archives. > I don

Re: svn commit: r1035658 - /ant/ivy/core/trunk/doap_Ivy.rdf

On 2010-11-16, wrote: > Initial DOAP file for Ivy Please, please go ahead and make it better (as well as the others I've committed). This file will only get us started. BTW, once projects.apache.org rebuilds the site, Ivy and IvyDE will be the first projects with "I". Stefan

Can Anybody Fix our Logos?

Hi, according to our logos should contain small "TM" symbols. You really don't want me to enter the graphics department - and I won't. We have three ant_logo_*.gif files in but I'

Re: svn commit: r1034687 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Main.java

On 2010-11-15, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 11/13/2010 02:07 AM, bode...@apache.org wrote: >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Main.java?rev=1034687&r1=1034686&r2=1034687&view=diff >>>msg.append("Apache Ant(TM) version "); > I guess ™

[RESULT] Bushel Donation Accepted

On 2010-11-05, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > So, do we want to accept the Bushel donation? The vote passed with +1s from Peter Reilly, Stefan Bodewig, Matt Benson, Dominique Devienne, Martijn Kruithof, Antoine Levy Lambert, Bruce Atherton, Jan Matèrne, Maarten Coene, Conor MacNeill and no tother vo

Re: issues with ant

On 2010-11-10, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 11/10/2010 12:17 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> this really is javac's fault > There's not really any good alternative policy for javac when the user > does not bother to specify a source level. Perhaps the -source and > -target

Re: issues with ant

On 2010-11-09, Ludmila Shikhvarg wrote: > I've discovered some ant's problem during gump testing with jdk7 Thank you for reporting them. It might be a good idea to open bugzilla issues for them. > 1. The projects below failed to compile with jdk7 (1.7.0): > junit, test-junit ... > [javac] jav

Re: svn commit: r1032922 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/BindTargets.java

On 2010-11-09, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I've peeked into the thread that followed but not read everything, yet. Well, I should have, obviously, since everything I added has already been said by DD and the target-alternative I suggested was already dismissed. I see that if the task r

Re: svn commit: r1032922 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/BindTargets.java

On 2010-11-09, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > Le 9 nov. 2010 à 13:39, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : >> On 2010-11-09, wrote: >>> Add a task to bind a target to an extension point. >> Might be controversial. I've peeked into the thread that followed but not read everything,

Re: svn commit: r1032922 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/BindTargets.java

On 2010-11-09, wrote: > Add a task to bind a target to an extension point. Might be controversial. What is the use-case? >public void setTargets(String target) { >String[] inputs = target.split(","); Wouldn't a nested element like 's nested be the better choice? Stefan

Re: Ant+Ivy session at Apache Barcamp

On 2010-11-02, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > - why do we not ship ant and ivy together ? To some people our current distributions are too big already 8-) There certainly is room for additional distribution formats like "the latest Ant bundled with the latest Ivy" that could be released whenever

Re: Bug fix for v1.8.1 in the near future?

On 2010-11-01, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > there is no ETA yet for 1.8.2. I would not mind building 1.8.2 this > month. This needs to be agreed upon by the ant community. There is a the usual bunch of bugzilla issues that could be fixed, but this is likely to remain a constant. I'm not aware o

Re: support for symlinks

On 2010-10-29, Max Birkoff wrote: > Do you have any ideas about when commons compress 1.2 might be > released? Usually new releases happen when anybody of the committers feels it is time to do so - and volunteers to create the release. In commons-compress case there have only been two (seemingly

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bushel Donation

On 2010-11-05, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > So, do we want to accept the Bushel donation? +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

[VOTE] Accept Bushel Donation

Hi, the people behind Bushel[1] want to donate their code to Ivy[2] and before I can start the formal IP clearance process we can and should vote whether we want to accept the donation at all. So, do we want to accept the Bushel donation? Stefan [1] Original: http://code.google.com/p/bushel/

Re: Import Bushel into Ivy

On 2010-10-22, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > So now I need to fill the software grant and ask the two other Bushel > committers to do so too. And I would need somebody who has enough > karma to help doing all the stuff about the Incubator's IP Clearance. > Any volunteer ? OK, I bite. Please send in

Re: support for symlinks

On 2010-10-27, Max Birkoff wrote: > I must admit to being a little confused by your suggestion. On one > hand you seem to say "go to another project" and on the other hand, > ant's code base contains the tar code that I have been using and would > like to improve. 8-) This is what I wanted to sa

Re: class BuildTimeoutException extends BuildException

On 2010-10-27, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 27/10/10 11:01, Steve Loughran wrote: >> I'm thinking we need a specific class BuildTimeoutException that extends >> BuildException >> I'll do the coding... > Of course, there is a well documented exception of just that name in > org.apache.tools.ant.tas

Re: ReviewBoard for Ant?

On 2010-10-26, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 10/26/2010 11:12 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> I've never used it, but nothing stops us from giving it a try. > OK, I filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3104 Seems to be there now, although I have no idea what to do with i

Re: support for symlinks

On 2010-10-27, Max Birkoff wrote: > I would like to add support for symlinks to: > org.apache.tools.tar.TarEntry and friends. I'd recommend you'd put that effort into the tar classes in Apache Commons Compress instead. The tar and zip classes of Ant are re

Re: ReviewBoard for Ant?

On 2010-10-26, Jesse Glick wrote: > Would this be useful? > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the I've never used it, but nothing stops us from giving it a try. So far I haven't been able to register with the site, though. Stefan

Re: How do I share data between custom Ant tasks?

On 2010-10-25, Dominique Devienne wrote: > I don't remember the details, but it's likely your two independent > that force using separate class loaders. Using either a > single taskdef loading a .properties file, or using a classpathref > might use the same classloader instead. The loaderref att

Re: [PATCH] ant-core/docs/manual/tutorial-writing-tasks.html

Thanks Kevin, I've committed the patch as it was but not updated the site, yet. In your section about getting the project you may want to mention that getProject is only available to task that (maybe via Task) inherit from ProjectComponent. Any other task can provide a void setProject(Project) m

Re: [PATCH] ant-core/docs/manual/tutorial-writing-tasks.html

Hi Kevin, On 2010-10-20, Kevin Connor Arpe wrote: > I am using instructions from here: > http://www.apache.org/dev/contributors.html#patches > This developer list has no specifics about sending patches. - well hidden, I know 8-) > Please let

Re: svn commit: r1026276 - /ant/core/trunk/check.xml

On 2010-10-22, wrote: > Can't easily switch Checkstyle 5.0 because of CS-Error "TreeWalker is > not allowed as a parent of Header" I went through this for Cactus (to make Cactus build in Gump). You have to make a few tweaks to the checkstyle configuration when upgrading[1], but the changes I ha

Re: Review Needed for "Publishing Maven Artifacts with Ivy" Doc

On 2010-10-08, Maarten Coene wrote: > The ivy:makepom task has been greatly enhanced in Ivy 2.2.0. It is now > possible to specify a custom pom template containing information about > the license, SCM, plugins, developers, ... OK, I'll enhance the page and say you should use the makepom task if y

Re: Review Needed for "Publishing Maven Artifacts with Ivy" Doc

On 2010-10-08, Jean-Louis Boudart wrote: > At the beggining of the documentation you say "In addition you will need a > minimal POM for your jar". > > Are you planning to maintain dependencies in both ivy.xml / pom.xml > manually? This is intended for projects that don't use Ivy for dependency ma

Review Needed for "Publishing Maven Artifacts with Ivy" Doc

Hi, I have one issue that is slowly bubbling up on my TODO list: I promised to provide Ant+Ivy content for Rather than starting a lengthy thread on this list, I've created a Wiki page

Re: svn commit: r1001756 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/helper/ProjectHelper2.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch/Locator.java src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/taskdef-te

On 2010-09-27, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 09/27/2010 10:49 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> (2) The new tests create JARs that will be loaded by a classloader - >> which means Ant cannot delete them because they remain locked until >> the JVM has exited. > Can'

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.2.0 Release

On 2010-09-24, Maarten Coene wrote: > Do you vote for the release of these binaries? > [X] Yes > [ ] No +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.or

Re: svn commit: r1001756 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/helper/ProjectHelper2.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch/Locator.java src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/taskdef-te

On 2010-09-27, wrote: > according to the javadocs of JarURLConnection the separator is !/ not > ! - this allows dealing with jars in directories that contain a ! in > their name, as long as it is not at the end of the directory name. This deals with splitting jar:file:somwhere/jar.file!/some/res

Re: ant-minify antlib

On 2010-09-16, Kevin Jackson wrote: > Is anyone else interested in helping maintain this antlib? I can't promise any coding (or closer to the reality, I won't do any) or even just reviewing of patches. I'd be available to vet releases and similar things. > Currently it wraps Yui library, but I

Re: [Manual] Wrong link#librarydependencies

On 2010-09-15, Gilbert Rebhan wrote: > has a wrong link for judoscript > site has => http://www.judoscript.com/index.html > should be => http://judoscript.org/home.html fixed in svn trunk, thanks. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-m

Re: attribute name with dash

On 2010-09-06, Benjamin de Dardel wrote: > Is it possible to define attribute name with dash ? Not with Ant's built-in reflection logic. Any attribute can only consist of characters leagl inside a Java method name. You can define attributes with a dash when you implement org.apache.tools.ant.Dy

P4 Tasks and ORO

Hi, ORO is on its way to become retired inside the Apache Attic and Regexp will likely follow it in a few months time. Apart from our own regexp-engine-abstraction-layer the only dependencies on either we have is inside the P4 tasks that use ORO's Perl5Util rather than plain regular expressions.

Re: openhatch

On 2010-08-28, Kevin Jackson wrote: > http://openhatch.org/ > This is a community site for all open source projects - do you think > it would be valuable to add the ant bugzilla to this? Wouldn't this imply we have open issues that are good candidates for people who want to get their feet wet wi

Re: Vote to promote VSS antlib out of sandbox

On 2010-09-01, Kevin Jackson wrote: > I have the day off tomorrow (Vietnamese Independence Day), so I will > get working on moveing the codebase from sandbox to antlibs proper > (this is were I screw up svn :) may help - it expect

[RESULT] Apache Compress Antlib 1.0 - Take 2

The vote has passed with five +1s (Kevin, Bruce, Peter, Conor and myself) and no -1s. I'll now proceed with publishing all the files, updating the download pages and will allow the mirrors a few hours / maybe a day to pick up the changes before I send out the announce email. Thanks Stefa

Re: Vote to promote VSS antlib out of sandbox

On 2010-08-25, Kevin Jackson wrote: > The VSS antlib[1] should be promoted from sandbox > [ ] Yes > [ ] No, because... +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...

Re: [VOTE] Apache Compress Antlib 1.0 - Take 2

On 2010-08-23, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > svn: revision 987994 of > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/antlibs/compress/tags/1_0/ > Distribution files: http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/compress/ > Maven artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant

Re: [VOTE] Apache Compress Antlib 1.0 - Take 2

forgot to say the vote runs for a week, starting over again today. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

[VOTE] Apache Compress Antlib 1.0 - Take 2

Hi, I've created new distribution artifacts without the empty WHATSNEW file and a README.html that points to the docs directory. svn: revision 987994 of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/antlibs/compress/tags/1_0/ Distribution files: http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/compress/ Maven artifact

[CANCELED] Release Apache Compress Antlib 1.0

Thanks to all who have voted so far, I'll re-roll the release after I've managed to remove the WHATSNEW and README.html files. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Compress Antlib 1.0

On 2010-08-20, Bruce Atherton wrote: > I notice that the README.html and WHATSNEW are empty apart from > headers. This strikes me as a little odd, I must admit I didn't look into these files. Both get generated from changes.xml which is empty since this is the first release. Maybe I should have

Re: Testlistener Events in JUnit Slows Down Forked Tests in 1.8.x

On 2010-08-11, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 08/10/2010 03:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> buffering on the testrunner side would help but at the same time make >> the lines unusable for the test listener events that must happen in >> step with the test to be useful. > I

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >