Here's the results of the vote:
Matt +1
Martijn -0.
Bruce Atherton +1
DD: -0 or -0.5
Stefan: 0 ( I guess)
Jan Materne: -1
Alexey -0
Enough negativety to block it, the key issue being threading under
gmail. I hadnt noticed that because I dont route jira mail to those
accounts, but I clearly u
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:45:58PM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The fact that people are running automation experiments on bugzilla
> > makes me think that now is a good time to move to Jira.
>
> Other ASF projects have alread
BTW, my Outlook 2003 has opened a new thread for this email ;-)
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Jeff Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. April 2007 05:35
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: JIRA/gmail threading (was: Re: [Vote] move defect
ts us to switch I dont think that we could decline ;-)
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Martijn Kruithof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. April 2007 21:00
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: Re: [Vote] move defect tracking from bugzilla to Ji
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:56:53AM -0500, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >GMail itself does not honour threading info. For each bug, I get two
> >message
> >threads - one with "NEW" and another with continuation. The thread is also
> >broken
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The fact that people are running automation experiments on bugzilla
makes me think that now is a good time to move to Jira.
Accordinly, I would like to call a vote about moving to JIRA
[] Yes, move to JIRA
[] No, stay with Bugzill
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fact that people are running automation experiments on bugzilla
> makes me think that now is a good time to move to Jira.
Other ASF projects have already dealt with JIRA spam, I don't see us
getting away from this problem by swi
Thunderbird threads Jira emails only sometimes. It looks like it does so
when the emails have exactly the same subject line, typically when the
ticket is updated. For other types of changes, such as work flow or
logging of work, they will not appear in the same thread.
I use Jira at work all the t
On 4/24/07, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GMail itself does not honour threading info. For each bug, I get two message
threads - one with "NEW" and another with continuation. The thread is also
broken in GMail, if the title is changed. There is no such problem in
Thunderbird.
Tr
GMail itself does not honour threading info. For each bug, I get two message
threads - one with "NEW" and another with continuation. The thread is also
broken in GMail, if the title is changed. There is no such problem in
Thunderbird.
Saying that Bugzilla works reasonably well and its open-sourc
--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The fact that people are running automation
> experiments on bugzilla
> makes me think that now is a good time to move to
> Jira. The way to do
> this is we file a bugrep with infrastructure
> pointing to a vote that
> made the decision. I thin
On 4/24/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] makes me think that now is a good time to move to Jira. [...]
[] Yes, move to JIRA
[X] No, stay with Bugzilla
JIRA does not play nice with the email threading features of GMail,
which is how I monitor the Ant forums, because it adds a
The fact that people are running automation experiments on bugzilla
makes me think that now is a good time to move to Jira. The way to do
this is we file a bugrep with infrastructure pointing to a vote that
made the decision. I think they can then import the entirety of the
database in there,
13 matches
Mail list logo
