+1
Martijn
Op 11-3-2013 15:05, Peter Reilly schreef:
+1
Peter
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart
jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on the release as is too
Works perfectly in easyant :)
2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
+1 on the release as is.
On
From the release notes:
- support for @Ignore annotation and requirement of JUnit 4.11
This isn't quite true: we now support @Ignore in JUnit4 but should be
able to support all JUnit versions. The change in JUnit JAR in the
optional directory was to allow testing of Assume failures with a
Apologies for my mistake.
I have just updated the homepage.
regards,
Antoine
On Mar 11, 2013, at 4:40 AM, Michael Clarke wrote:
From the release notes:
- support for @Ignore annotation and requirement of JUnit 4.11
This isn't quite true: we now support @Ignore in JUnit4 but should be
+1
Peter
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart
jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on the release as is too
Works perfectly in easyant :)
2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
+1 on the release as is.
On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
You can veto
+1 on the release as is too
Works perfectly in easyant :)
2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
+1 on the release as is.
On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would
then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and
Hi,
the release vote has passed with 5 +1's and no other votes.
Also we need to update the WHATSNEW [on the web site only, none in the release
artefacts] to mention the fact that 1.9.0 requires Java 1.5.
I am going to start copying the artifacts and updating the web site.
Regards,
Antoine
Hi,
I am pleased to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.9.0.
Apache Ant is a Java based build tool.
- Version 1.9.0 is the first Ant release which requires at least Java 1.5.
- support for @Ignore annotation and requirement of JUnit 4.11
- the zip, bzip2 and tar are improved
- removal
+1 on the release as is.
On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would
then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build.
Maybe I'm picking nits: you can't veto a release, this is a majority
vote.
Stefan
“Changes that could break older environments” fails to list the Java 5
requirement!
Typo in WHATSNEW: “NullPointerExcpetion”
Otherwise, +1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands,
Good catch, Jesse. I have to admit I find the lack of a mention of
requiring Java 5 troubling. That is definitely a difference people are
going to care about.
Is it possible to sneak that edit in to the WHATSNEW file (in both the
bin and src packages) without a whole new revote?
On 13-03-08
Hello Bruce,
the WHATSNEW is included in the bin and the src package so to change it a new
vote would be required. In fact a new build would be required.
You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would then have
to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build.
Yes, that is what I thought.
I think your answer is a good compromise. +1 on the vote.
On 08/03/2013 2:10 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Hello Bruce,
the WHATSNEW is included in the bin and the src package so to change it a new
vote would be required. In fact a new build would be required.
+1
Maarten
From: Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
Adding that I had forgotten to put the .asc files, this is now
Adding that I had forgotten to put the .asc files, this is now uploaded too.
On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:16 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I have uploaded candidate artifacts a second time for an ant 1.9.0 release to
: http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ after having incorporated
I did not find the time to make a new build last night, it will be for my NYC
evening.
Regards,
Antoine
On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:43 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
In fact I found out that I need to add ham crest on the class path, this was
probably meant by the patch but I did not notice
On 03/04/2013 11:25 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
in fact the patch is failing one test :
testTestMethods in junit-test.xml
Now fixed? Reports:
skipping tests since it fails when using JUnit 4
But there is one genuine failure I know about, which predates @Ignore support:
On 03/05/2013 08:45 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
Reproducible locally when running on Java 7. Not yet sure what it means but it
looks bad.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54641
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
yes, I also noticed the failure of this XMLResultAggregatorTest and came to the
conclusion that the junitreport stylesheet needed to be changed.
Regards,
Antoine
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:16 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
On 03/05/2013 08:45 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
Reproducible locally when running
Hi,
I have uploaded candidate artifacts a second time for an ant 1.9.0 release to :
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ after having incorporated the patches
of Michael Clarke concerning JUnit.
Let's vote on releasing Ant 1.9.0 a second time.
Let' start with my own +1
Regards,
Antoine
Nice work Antoine,
+1
Conor
On 4 March 2013 15:34, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I have uploaded candidate artefacts for an ant 1.9.0 release to :
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/
Let's vote on releasing these.
Let' start with my own +1
I ran the build
-0. My main reservation is that an important patch, JUnit @Ignore support [1], is outstanding. (I promised Michael Clarke it would get reviewed.) It could be pushed back
to 1.9.1 of course, but that could be a long way off.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43969
Hello Jesse,
I will incorporate the patch for JUnit support and do another build.
Regards,
Antoine
On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
-0. My main reservation is that an important patch, JUnit @Ignore support
[1], is outstanding. (I promised Michael Clarke it would get reviewed.)
Hello Jesse,
in fact the patch is failing one test :
testTestMethods in junit-test.xml
The test bad in T2.java runs [or at least something is reported as failing ]
although only ok is included.
Regards,
Antoine
echo file=${input}/T1.javapublic class T1 extends
In fact I found out that I need to add ham crest on the class path, this was
probably meant by the patch but I did not notice that.
Regards,
Antoine
On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Hello Jesse,
in fact the patch is failing one test :
testTestMethods in
On 2013-02-19, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
I am currently looking at the test failures of Ant under linux with
Oracle JDK 1.6 here [1].
These tests are referenced from the Nightly+ Continuous Builds page
[2] under Apache Ant - Core Trunk (Linux)
I'd rather work with
Hello Stefan,
I have found out that the root cause of the test failures found is the java vm
running with file.encoding set to ASCII.
The tests that fail are written in such a way that they assume that Ant is
running with file.encoding=UTF-8 which is the default it seems in a lot of Java
1.6
Hi,
I have uploaded candidate artefacts for an ant 1.9.0 release to :
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/
Let's vote on releasing these.
Let' start with my own +1
I ran the build on MacOS with JDK 1.6 and there were no errors/failures in the
tests.
On MacOS with JDK 1.7 two tests
.
-Original Message-
From: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 10:17 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: Ant 1.9.0
Hello,
after a few weeks of very hard work at my day job I have a quiet day to look at
these patches.
I also need to look at possible
On 02/19/2013 10:31 AM, Justin Georgeson wrote:
have an issue with the javac task and package-info.class
Please use Bugzilla to report things like this.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional
Indeed
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54583
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Glick [mailto:jgl...@cloudbees.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:34 PM
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ant 1.9.0
On 02/19/2013 10:31 AM, Justin Georgeson wrote:
have an issue
Hello,
after a few weeks of very hard work at my day job I have a quiet day to look at
these patches.
I also need to look at possible test failures running the ant test suite on my
MAC with Java 1.7
Regards,
Antoine
On Feb 5, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
On 01/30/2013 10:09 PM,
Hi,
I am currently looking at the test failures of Ant under linux with Oracle JDK
1.6 here [1].
These tests are referenced from the Nightly+ Continuous Builds page [2] under
Apache Ant - Core Trunk (Linux)
It looks like the OS/JVM combination does not read properly the XML entities or
the
On 01/30/2013 10:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs?
Those with PatchAvailable [1] should be checked. (Pity that we cannot just get pull requests; coming from the land of GitHub this feels really primitive.) There were a
Levy Lambert wrote:
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:09:33 -0500
From: Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de
Reply-To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: Ant 1.9.0
Hi,
I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.
In WHATSNEW I see
Hi
On 2013-01-31, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.
Obviously I've not been very active here lately, and to be honest, I
don't expect this to change anytime soon. Thank you for taking this
forward.
Matt, do you expect the Java5ification
I don't think I've affected any APIs as yet. This would be acceptable.
Matt
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
On 2013-01-31, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.
Obviously I've not been very
30, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.dewrote:
Hi,
I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.
In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs.
Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ?
Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously
,
I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.
In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs.
Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ?
Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant tasks
from Ant due to the availability
redirect on where to get the tasks now.
[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201005.mbox/browser
[2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201006.mbox/browser
On 30/01/2013 7:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0
soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.
In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs.
Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ?
Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant
tasks from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied
Thanks very much, Antoine. It's appreciated.
On 13-01-31 06:11 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Hello Bruce,
I can see myself implementing the removal of the Perforce Ant tasks, this
should be pretty straightforward.
I will work on this this week-end.
Regards,
Antoine
41 matches
Mail list logo
