On Wed, 21 May 2003 03:29 am, Steve Loughran wrote:
+1, with couple of questions
-I'm unsure about the point that Active PMC members have the binding vote
for committers -to date its been open to all committers to have binding
votes. Is there a reason for the change?
The PMC role is to do
On Wed, 21 May 2003 05:30 am, Bruce Atherton wrote:
+1 assuming the typos are fixed. I'd go in and fix them, but I'm not sure
whether that might affect the vote.
No, fixing typos wouldn't affect the vote, so please go ahead and fix them :-)
Thanks
Conor
PMC members,
I'd like to move towards adoption of the bylaws draft.
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ant/proposal/ant-site
/anakia/docs/bylaws.html?rev=1.16
Could you please view this and vote indicating your position. If
you wish to
vote -1 because you don't believe the
There's one thing I don't like, the Adoption of New Codebase part
under Actions.
As the text is it reads (at least I read it that way) as if Rules for
Revolutionaries were the only possible way to adopt a new code base.
Apart from the fact that I personally don't like RfR too much, I think
that
On Wed, 21 May 2003 04:19 pm, Bruce Atherton wrote:
Ok, done.
Great - thanks.
But in proofing the document I realized there was another issue that may be
a significant typo or may just require a bit more editing.
The responsibilities section says this:
The PMC may consider the position
On Wed, 21 May 2003 07:41 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Do we need to refer to RfR at all?
No. Actually I don't like RfR either. I've removed it and added a snippet to
cover new sub-project creation here too. Refer to the recent commit and let
me know what you think. Should the latter be
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Refer to the recent commit and let me know what you think.
I've already done so 8-)
+1 on the bylaws as they are right now.
Should the latter be restricted to PMC members?
Proposal of subprojects should not be restricted to PMC
+1
- Original Message -
From: Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 3:00 AM
Subject: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws
PMC members,
I'd like to move towards adoption of the bylaws draft.
+1
On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 03:00 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote:
PMC members,
I'd like to move towards adoption of the bylaws draft.
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ant/proposal/ant-site/
anakia/docs/bylaws.html?rev=1.16
Could you please view this and vote indicating your position.
Conor MacNeill wrote:
PMC members,
I'd like to move towards adoption of the bylaws draft.
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ant/proposal/ant-site/anakia/docs/bylaws.html?rev=1.16
Could you please view this and vote indicating your position. If you wish
to vote -1 because you
+1, with couple of questions
-I'm unsure about the point that Active PMC members have the binding vote
for committers -to date its been open to all committers to have binding
votes. Is there a reason for the change?
-We dont have anything (formally) about the survey process used to cover
At 05:00 PM 5/20/2003 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote:
PMC members,
I'd like to move towards adoption of the bylaws draft.
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ant/proposal/ant-site/anakia/docs/bylaws.html?rev=1.16
+1 assuming the typos are fixed. I'd go in and fix them, but I'm not sure
12 matches
Mail list logo
