On 2010-06-23, Danny Yates wrote:
Also, I'd really like it so that I don't have to subant (or ant or
antcall or whetever) into the service-specific scripts, because there are
(will be) a large number of touch points, and I don't want to have to go and
find each of them whenever a new service
On 2010-06-22, Danny Yates wrote:
OK, so no feedback. Consider this to be me nagging :-)
Consider me nagged.
I've taken your patch and modified it locally so the attribute is now
named onMissingExtensionPoint (and the value error has been renamed to
fail). I've also added constants for the
That's awesome. Thanks Stefan.
I take it this will be in 1.8.2 then? Is there a schedule for release?
On 23 June 2010 11:34, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-06-22, Danny Yates wrote:
OK, so no feedback. Consider this to be me nagging :-)
Consider me nagged.
I've taken
On 2010-06-23, Danny Yates wrote:
I take it this will be in 1.8.2 then?
Yes.
Is there a schedule for release?
Not even a tentative one so far.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
I've taken your patch and modified it locally so the attribute is now
named onMissingExtensionPoint (and the value error has been renamed to
fail). I've also added constants for the three possible attribute
values to
So, we have two top-level Ant scripts: build.xml and deploy.xml. Our system
consists of a number of services and, right now, details of how to build,
package, deploy and start those services is scattered around these files
(and a handful of include/macro files too) which makes adding new services
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Danny Yates da...@codeaholics.org wrote:
[...]
In essence, you describe the build file which uses extensionOf
importing/including the build file which has the extension-points, but we're
trying to work the other way around and throwing two master build files
Thanks for the pointer ref fileset
I'm not sure that merging the two builds is possible for various reasons.
Technically, yes; but for security reasons, no.
Also, I'd really like it so that I don't have to subant (or ant or
antcall or whetever) into the service-specific scripts, because there
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Danny Yates da...@codeaholics.org wrote:
Thanks for the pointer ref fileset
I'm not sure that merging the two builds is possible for various reasons.
Technically, yes; but for security reasons, no.
Also, I'd really like it so that I don't have to subant (or
OK, so no feedback. Consider this to be me nagging :-)
On 21 June 2010 13:37, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-06-21, Danny Yates wrote:
Anything I can do to assist?
Wait and answer questions/concerns as they arrise (if they arrise).
Nag and become annoying if you feel
On 2010-06-19, Danny Yates wrote:
I've made some changes to add an extension-point-missing attribute which
takes values:
- error - the current behaviour (and default if the attribute is
missing)
- warn - log a warning and ignore (see next)
- ignore - don't stop or warn, and
Thanks Stefan.
Anything I can do to assist?
Cheers,
Danny.
On 21 June 2010 07:59, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-06-19, Danny Yates wrote:
I've made some changes to add an extension-point-missing attribute
which
takes values:
- error - the current behaviour (and
On 2010-06-21, Danny Yates wrote:
Anything I can do to assist?
Wait and answer questions/concerns as they arrise (if they arrise).
Nag and become annoying if you feel it takes too long ;-)
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
13 matches
Mail list logo
