Re: things that break

2003-09-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> pass for a self-compiled Mono 0.26 on Linux and a fink installed >> Mono 0.23 on Mac OS X (one day I'll figure out how to compile Mono >> 0.26 without a JIT and can upgrade my Mac installation). > > do you c

Re: things that break

2003-09-23 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 23 Sep 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The late fix to DotnetCompile doesnt seem to break C# apps. They've broken Mono: Things go back to the point where we've been a few days ago (i.e. all csc

Re: things that break

2003-09-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 23 Sep 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The late fix to DotnetCompile doesnt seem to break C# apps. > > They've broken Mono: Things go back to the point where we've been a few days ago (i.e. all csc tests pas

Re: things that break

2003-09-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The late fix to DotnetCompile doesnt seem to break C# apps. They've broken Mono: testCSC-Mono: [csc] compiling 2 files [csc] error CS0518: The predefined type `System.Object' is not defined ... I'll look into it today.

things that break

2003-09-23 Thread Steve Loughran
The late fix to DotnetCompile doesnt seem to break C# apps. But it does stamp on vbc, which clearly does not have the autoreferencing feature of C#. Which makes me feel midly guilty, though of course we havent shipped vbc, so havent broken shipping product. I've patched the test that catches it,