DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17695] - EOL Makes Starteam Checkout Say Status Modified

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: pointer to half-hearted official MS.NET ant-ish tool

Not directly related, but I recently read that Maven similarly moved away from relative path to use absolute paths. They apparently prefix ${basedir} explicitly everywhere. I'm not following the dev forum, but thought the parallel was worth mentioning. --DD -Original Message- From: Steve L

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17695] - EOL Makes Starteam Checkout Say Status Modified

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17646] - Starteam Checkout Not Handling Deleted Labels

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17695] - EOL Makes Starteam Checkout Say Status Modified

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17646] - Starteam Checkout Not Handling Deleted Labels

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17796] - FilterChain LineContainsRegExp StackOverflowError

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17796] - FilterChain LineContainsRegExp StackOverflowError

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17796] New: - FilterChain LineContainsRegExp StackOverflowError

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: 1.5.3?

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 09:43 Subject: Re: 1.5.3? > > 1.5.3 seems needed - and ASAP. > > Maybe we should withdrawl the 1.5.2 distribution. It happened to other > projects. > How about calling

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17735] - FTP problems in Ant 1.5.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17782] New: - expandproperties not substituting within same file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[PATCH] Keeping Java processes running after exit

Hello I have been frustrated by a change between Ant 1.4.1 and Ant 1.5, and I offer here a patch. First I describe the problem, then my solution. I had previously used Ant to start my Tomcat engine ("ant start-server"). This was by using a Java task with fork="true". When Ant exited my server was

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17781] New: - name attribute of record task is not relative to basedir

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: 1.5.3?

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> For those who have not been following the traffic on this bug can >> someone please have a capsule summary about what breaks when you use >> it? Is it the only which is affected, or are things >> like affec

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17780] New: - Instead of updating a jar file, the task overrides it.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PATCH] [17471] -projecthelp does not work with -quiet

Well, we need to be sure it needs fixing :) This may sound silly but -projecthelp -verbose is more informative than the default listing, so the quiet listing should be less informative. The issue is how much less informative - Original Message - From: "Loïc Péron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17674] - Ant junit tasks do not work with Junit 3.8 and 3.81

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: 1.5.3?

It must be something specific to WinZIP. My 1.5.2 jars/wars/zip all deploy fine, can be read with numerous zip reading programs, including the built-in zip file support on Windows XP. I don't even have winZIP installed, but I would be happy to get it and test if necessary. Zip-file readers that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10755] - Ant 1.5's jar task fails to add new files when run multiple times

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17713] - task that counts lines of source code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17735] - FTP problems in Ant 1.5.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net FTP.java

conor 2003/03/07 06:58:14 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH FTP.java Log: Merge Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.21.2.8 +1 -1 a

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh Scp.java

bodewig 2003/03/07 06:53:36 Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks scp.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh Scp.java Log: .ssh is in ${user.home}, not ${user.dir}. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks/scp.h

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net FTP.java

conor 2003/03/07 06:51:59 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net FTP.java Log: When changing dirs resolve to the coorect separator conventions PR: 10755 Revision ChangesPath 1.35 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optio

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks jar.html

bodewig 2003/03/07 06:48:52 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks jar.html Log: Fix ambiguity in the manual Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/jar.html Index: jar.html === R

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant AntClassLoader.java

bodewig 2003/03/07 06:43:17 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant AntClassLoader.java Log: looks better that way Revision ChangesPath 1.68 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/AntClassLoader.java Index: AntClassLoader.java

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant AntClassLoader.java

bodewig 2003/03/07 06:41:10 Modified:docs/manual credits.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant AntClassLoader.java Log: Improve log message when classloader fails to read a resource. Submitted by: Sascha Freitag Revision ChangesPath 1.21 +1 -1

RE: 1.5.3?

Well, sure, not everyone. But not anyone? -Original Message- From: Jesse Stockall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:38 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: 1.5.3? On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 09:32 AM, Steve Cohen wrote: > > I don't understand why there is a

Re: 1.5.3?

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do the archives produced at least continue to work as jars? I've been creating wars for our production servers using CVS HEAD ever since the bug has been introduced and so far Tomcat hasn't seen any problems. > that is, does the jar pr

Re: 1.5.3?

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 09:32 AM, Steve Cohen wrote: I don't understand why there is a problem with verifying the fix. WinZIP is near-ubiquitous (although I don't use it myself). I suppose it will be fully tested with WinZIP before release, right? Not everyone uses Windows :) Jesse Stockall

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10755] - Ant 1.5's jar task fails to add new files when run multiple times

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: 1.5.3?

Do the archives produced at least continue to work as jars? that is, does the jar program still work with them as far as extraction, listing, etc? Is it only winzip that has the problem or do other programs have the problem? I don't understand why there is a problem with verifying the fix. WinZI

Re: Diagnostics.java bug

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Richard Emberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the ant file Diagnostics.java, in method > doReportTasksAvailability change from So that a NoClassDefFoundError > does not stop the listing. This has already been fixed in CVS HEAD, NoClassDefFoundError gets caught explicitly n

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10755] - Ant 1.5's jar task fails to add new files when run multiple times

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: 1.5.3?

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For those who have not been following the traffic on this bug can > someone please have a capsule summary about what breaks when you use > it? Is it the only which is affected, or are things > like affected as well? All /// tasks usi

RE: 1.5.3?

For those who have not been following the traffic on this bug can someone please have a capsule summary about what breaks when you use it? Is it the only which is affected, or are things like affected as well? I am trying to decide whether to pull 1.5.2 internally here. I don't think we use mu

[PATCH] [17471] -projecthelp does not work with -quiet

Hi all, As stated in http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17471 -- quote bug 17471 When invoked using -projecthelp -quiet, ant does not show anything. This seems like a bug, as using -projecthelp is to get some info. The source of this behaviour is in the use of project.log(String

patch to specify user defined project class

Hi, I've never submitted a patch here so please let me know if this is not the right way. I've attached a small patch that's become very useful to me. I used ant for a project at work to provide an intelligent controller that ties several related pieces of code together. For this, I found it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17648] - not working for zip task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Zip.java

bodewig 2003/03/07 04:38:39 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH Zip.java Log: Merge fix for bug 17648 from HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.78.2.1

cvs commit: ant/xdocs antnews.xml contributors.xml external.xml faq.xml index.xml

bodewig 2003/03/07 04:36:20 Modified:.Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH KEYS docs Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH antnews.html contributors.html external.html faq.html index.html docs/manual Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH credits.html xdocsTag

Re: 1.5.3?

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:28 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >> So far it is hard to recommend switching to 1.5.2. > > Should we pull it, then? Might be better, I'm not sure. > As for timeframe, how about monday week for 1.5.3 Beta 1? Fin

cvs commit: ant KEYS

bodewig 2003/03/07 03:56:10 Modified:.KEYS Log: Some PGP key changes Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +20 -21ant/KEYS Index: KEYS === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/KEYS,v retrieving revision 1.

Re: 1.5.3?

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:28 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Not too long. So far it is hard to recommend switching to 1.5.2. > Should we pull it, then? > > Should we limit 1.5 branch changes to these fixes to avoid > > introducing other issues? > > I think so. > OK, agreed. As for timeframe, how ab

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17735] - FTP problems in Ant 1.5.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/xdocs antnews.xml contributors.xml index.xml

bodewig 2003/03/07 03:32:20 Modified:docs antnews.html contributors.html index.html docs/manual credits.html xdocsantnews.xml contributors.xml index.xml Log: This is what I think about ePost's new business model Revision ChangesPath 1

Re: 1.5.3?

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is also a junit version issue which we should address. I think this isn't real. > although only releases seem to bring issues out :-). Yes, unfortunately. 8-( If only Christopher had told us of the Cactus problem earlier ;-)

Re: 1.5.3?

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:02 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > as I feared, the zip refactorings have introduced a (at least one) > nasty bug. I think 17648 is serious enough to warrant a 1.5.3 release > rather soon. We might get a chance to look into the new FTP issue at > the same time. > > Thoug

Re: 1.5.3?

On Fri, 07 Mar 2003, Christopher Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can reproduce this using 1.5.2, while 1.5.1 doesn't expose the > problem. > > Is this the same issue? Probably yes. The Gump run of 2003-03-08 should produce valid zips (even for WinZIP) if it is. Stefan

Re: 1.5.3?

Hi Stefan, I think this bug is causing the Gump-built ZIPs of Jakarta-Cactus to get corrupted in such a way that at least WinZip cannot handle them: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-cactus/nightly/ I can reproduce this using 1.5.2, while 1.5.1 doesn't expose the problem. Is this the same is

Re: 1.5.3?

+1 - the issue is serious enough to warrant it. I haven't looked into the issue, but the report seemed to indicate a regression bug. On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 03:02 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, as I feared, the zip refactorings have introduced a (at least one) nasty bug. I think 17648 i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17458] - OS X - bin/ant uses jars in wrong directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/script ant

bodewig 2003/03/07 00:42:26 Modified:src/script ant Log: Make JIKESPATH construction on Mac OS X take JAVA_HOME into account. This won't change anything if the user doesn't set JAVA_HOME. PR: 17458 Submitted by: Dwayne Schultz Revision ChangesPath 1.34 +1 -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17730] - wizip does not show content below WEB-INF

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17713] - task that counts lines of source code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17709] - junit report produces invalid XML hence junitreport fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17674] - Ant junit tasks do not work with Junit 3.8 and 3.81

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17730] - wizip does not show content below WEB-INF

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17660] - additional example for

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17730] - wizip does not show content below WEB-INF

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17648] - not working for zip task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Zip.java

bodewig 2003/03/07 00:07:18 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Zip.java Log: Set file mode correctly for files read from s. PR: 17648 Submitted by: Antoine Levy-Lambert Revision ChangesPath 1.99 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskde

1.5.3?

Hi, as I feared, the zip refactorings have introduced a (at least one) nasty bug. I think 17648 is serious enough to warrant a 1.5.3 release rather soon. We might get a chance to look into the new FTP issue at the same time. Thoughts? Stefan

AW: pointer to half-hearted official MS.NET ant-ish tool

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Freitag, 7. März 2003 02:07 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: pointer to half-hearted official MS.NET ant-ish tool > > heh, microsoft have just released an automated tool to build, test and > depl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17545] - Catalog due not follow OASIS catalog spec

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17526] - nested tag param for style task doesn't support property substitution

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17458] - OS X - bin/ant uses jars in wrong directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10755] - Ant 1.5's jar task fails to add new files when run multiple times

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17684] - Ant version 1.5.1 jar with update option behaves diff from 1.4.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Proposal] Krysalis Centipede, Ruper, Version to Ant

On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > how about an ant sandbox? +1 IMHO we should move the whole proposal area there, this would also make our CVS snapshots smaller. Stefan

Re: [SUBMIT] scp

On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Joe Consumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but I read on the jcraft site, that jsch requires 1.4 so I didn't > bother. Two weeks ago or so I posted to the jsch list that I have successfully used jsch with JDK 1.2 (and 1.3) and bouncycastle's JCE implementation

RE: Ant homepage in konqueror

In Konqueror 3.0.3-14 (Redhat Linux 8.0) I definitely do not see what you are describing. -Original Message- From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/6/2003 6:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject:RE: Ant homepage in konqueror Steve Cohen wrote

pointer to half-hearted official MS.NET ant-ish tool

heh, microsoft have just released an automated tool to build, test and deploy your .net apps: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=b32497b0-77f7-4831- 9c55-58bf3962163e&DisplayLang=en with description here, in a winzip exe wrapper around what is really a PDF File http://www.m

Re: [SUBMIT] scp

Stephan, > I've committed the task more or less as-is, I pretty > much only changed That's great! > One thing that I'd like to get fixed more or less > immediately (will do it myself if you don't find > the time to look into it, Charlie) is the JDK 1.4 > dependency. It stems from two > Numb

RE: Ant homepage in konqueror

Steve Cohen wrote: > I use Konqueror sometimes but I don't see the problem you see. Can you > describe a little more fully? I'm using Konqueror 3.1.0 - and the left side is very narrow, so all multi-word items are split to fit. Manual Related Projects External Tools and Tasks Resources