DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28479.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jhm 2004/04/19 22:46:48
Modified:xdocsexternal.xml
docs external.html
Log:
28479: NetBeans ships 1.6.1. Thanks Jesse
Revision ChangesPath
1.121 +1 -1 ant/xdocs/external.xml
Index: external.xml
Something is broken with my internet connection. So I don´t know,
whether the 1.6_Branch is updated also...
Jan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 7:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit: ant/docs
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I see the problem:
I think I have a spare quarter of an hour to look into fixing it.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/ant/test-ant/gump_work/build_ant_test-ant
.html
last third of the page:
Testcase: testJunit(org.apache.tools.ant.types.AssertionsTest): Caused an
ERROR
Test AssertionTest failed
/data3/gump/ant/src/etc/testcases/types/assertions.xml:158: Test
AssertionTest
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27218.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2004/04/19 23:24:25
Modified:.WHATSNEW
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types Assertions.java
CommandlineJava.java
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types
CommandlineJavaTest.java
Log:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27218.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2004/04/19 23:52:48
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Java.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit
JUnitTask.java
Log:
Minor formatting changes
Revision ChangesPath
1.91 +1 -1
bodewig 2004/04/19 23:53:30
Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
Java.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit Tag:
bodewig 2004/04/20 00:00:26
Modified:docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH external.html
xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH external.xml
Log:
Merge
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.136.2.10 +1 -55
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I don´t know, whether the 1.6_Branch is updated also...
It didn't, but I've merged it now.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ant/docs external.html
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I don´t know, whether the
bodewig 2004/04/20 00:27:21
Modified:docs faq.html
docs/manual/OptionalTasks junit.html
xdocsfaq.xml
Log:
Document yet another classloading quirk within junit, PR: 24646
Revision ChangesPath
1.97 +31 -0 ant/docs/faq.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24646.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2004/04/20 00:29:36
Modified:docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH faq.html
docs/manual/OptionalTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH junit.html
xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH faq.xml
Log:
merge
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
Jesse Glick wrote:
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
The attached diffs banish the dreaded breakiterator messages during
Javadoc execution while building Ant under Java 1.4.
Before you spend much time on this, consider
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bodewig 2004/04/19 23:24:25
Modified:.WHATSNEW
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types Assertions.java
CommandlineJava.java
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types
Please read the attached file.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28353.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Sean C. Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are there plans to release Ant 1.6.2 soon?
No concrete plans yet.
I agree with Jan that we've achieved some important fixes in CVS since
the 1.6.1 release. There will always be one more bug to fix ...
There are a few things in
bodewig 2004/04/20 05:48:43
Modified:docs/manual dirtasks.html
docs/manual/CoreTasks concat.html java.html
docs/manual/CoreTypes xmlcatalog.html
docs/manual/OptionalTasks ccm.html dotnet.html
replaceregexp.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2004/04/20 05:52:21
Modified:docs/manual Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH dirtasks.html
docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH concat.html
java.html
docs/manual/CoreTypes Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH xmlcatalog.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28084.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28353.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2004 13:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ant 1.6.2 ?
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Sean C. Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are there plans to release Ant 1.6.2 soon?
No concrete plans yet.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27976.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28353.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28444.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2004/04/20 06:25:08
Modified:.WHATSNEW
Log:
Generate proper file URLs in AntClassLoader#getResource, PR: 28060
Revision ChangesPath
1.590 +3 -0 ant/WHATSNEW
Index: WHATSNEW
bodewig 2004/04/20 06:25:08
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant AntClassLoader.java
Log:
Generate proper file URLs in AntClassLoader#getResource, PR: 28060
Revision ChangesPath
1.82 +5 -2 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/AntClassLoader.java
Index:
bodewig 2004/04/20 06:25:15
Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW
Log:
merge
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.503.2.73 +3 -0 ant/WHATSNEW
Index: WHATSNEW
bodewig 2004/04/20 06:25:15
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
AntClassLoader.java
Log:
merge
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.76.2.6 +5 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28060.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16428.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1
also +1 ;-)
Should we make a list of things we want to see fixed and call
it a freeze for 1.6.2 when done?
I´d visited Bugzilla and found some entries which should (IMHO) be discussed
in that area.
Jan
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14255
Jar task does not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28320.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jhm 2004/04/20 07:45:26
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html
Log:
Document the use of @{attributes} inside attribute/ definition.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +30 -6 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/macrodef.html
Index: macrodef.html
jhm 2004/04/20 07:53:12
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH macrodef.html
Log:
Merge
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.2.2.14 +81 -8 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/macrodef.html
Index:
Anyone else seen this?
[junit] Testcase:
testDuplicateTargetsImport(org.apache.tools.ant.ProjectTes
t): Caused an ERROR
[junit] tried to access method
org.apache.tools.ant.BuildFileTest.expectLog(
Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;)V from class
org.apache.tools.ant.ProjectTe
st
stevel 2004/04/20 08:02:38
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtils.java
Log:
move to the Java1.2 implementation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.66 +14 -22ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/FileUtils.java
Index: FileUtils.java
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/**
+ * get the granularity of file timestamps.
+ * The choice is made on OS, which is
incorrect -it should really be
+ * by filesystem. We do not have an easy way
to probe for file systems,
+ * however.
Funny you should mention
Never seen anything like it... but am I crazy here? I
thought Ljava/lang/String would be referring to a
String[], but there is no such method
void expectLog(String[], String[]), only
void expectLog(String, String).
If I am not mistaken about the significance of the
L, I suppose this would be
mbenson 2004/04/20 08:26:39
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html
Log:
Typo correction.
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/macrodef.html
Index: macrodef.html
I'd like to see bug 27722 added to the list. There are patches attached
to the bug that fix a problem with project and target descriptions. The
patches implement what appears to have been the intented behaviour of
description attributes and elements, and would be a big help in being
able to
From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought Ljava/lang/String would be referring to a
String[], but there is no such method
void expectLog(String[], String[]), only
void expectLog(String, String).
If I am not mistaken about the significance of the
L, I suppose this would be
--- Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought Ljava/lang/String would be referring
to a
String[], but there is no such method
No Ljava/lang/String; is String,
whereas [Ljava/lang/String; is String[]. --DD
Gotcha, thanks.
-Matt
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19959.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mbenson 2004/04/20 08:42:36
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html
Log:
Add nested text support commentary to HEAD.
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +51 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/macrodef.html
Index: macrodef.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23119.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14941.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Matt Benson wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/**
+ * get the granularity of file timestamps.
+ * The choice is made on OS, which is
incorrect -it should really be
+ * by filesystem. We do not have an easy way
to probe for file systems,
+ * however.
Funny you should
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11836.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm adding security to a JVM
1. to enable the security manager on a JVM , you go
java -Djava.security.manager
2. to name the policy file you go
-Djava.security.policy==policy-file
with two equals
I assume we can do (2) with a sysproperty of
sysproperty name=java.security.policy
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can probe for NTFS by creating a file with a stream. e.g
foo.txt:1
And how do you create a file with a stream in Java Steve? --DD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm adding security to a JVM
1. to enable the security manager on a JVM , you go
[SNIP] But what about (1)? Do
you think a value
of will get through?
Judging from the code, I would think it would... if
not a temporary workaround should be
Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can probe for NTFS by creating a file with a stream. e.g
foo.txt:1
And how do you create a file with a stream in Java Steve? --DD
Just open a file with that name?
File f=new File(c:\foo.txt:1);
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19959.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mbenson 2004/04/20 09:29:48
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH macrodef.html
Log:
Sync with HEAD.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.2.2.15 +2 -2 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/macrodef.html
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28504.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28504.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28504.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mbenson 2004/04/20 10:41:27
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html
Log:
Removed v1.14 conflict indicator.
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +0 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/macrodef.html
Index: macrodef.html
mbenson 2004/04/20 10:42:51
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH macrodef.html
Log:
Sync with HEAD.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.2.2.16 +0 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/macrodef.html
Index:
+1
I'd like to see Ant 1.6.2 embedded inside Eclipse 3.0 final.
-Sean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 10:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Ant 1.6.2 ?
Mmh, Eclipse will release a milestone 9 on May and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28340.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1
-Matt
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
also +1 ;-)
Should we make a list of things we want to see
fixed and call
it a freeze for 1.6.2 when done?
I´d visited Bugzilla and found some entries which
should (IMHO) be discussed
in that area.
Jan
mbenson 2004/04/20 12:27:54
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java
Log:
Switch getParentFile(File) to delegate to File.getParentFile() and deprecate.
Revision ChangesPath
1.106 +5 -6 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Main.java
Index: Main.java
mbenson 2004/04/20 12:29:56
Modified:.WHATSNEW
docs/manual/CoreTasks loadproperties.html
src/etc/testcases/taskdefs loadproperties.xml
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs LoadProperties.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28340.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23395
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Sean C. Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are there plans to release Ant 1.6.2 soon?
I will be happy to make this release of course.
No concrete plans
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28505.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28505.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28060.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mbenson 2004/04/20 14:37:59
Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH touch.xml
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
Touch.java
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag:
mbenson 2004/04/20 14:39:28
Modified:.WHATSNEW
Log:
Add touch filelist support to 1.6 branch.
Revision ChangesPath
1.592 +2 -2 ant/WHATSNEW
Index: WHATSNEW
===
RCS file:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25345
jspc tag broken with new version of jasper
4 votes
(one of many to Tomcat5)
so what do we do hear. We could pull the -v option, but there is the
risk of many other changes they made.
I propose
1. we fix
2. we tell people in the docs to
mbenson 2004/04/20 14:59:18
Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW
Log:
AntLikeTasksAtTopLevelTest on cygwin is in 1.6 branch
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.503.2.75 +2 -0 ant/WHATSNEW
Index:
mbenson 2004/04/20 15:09:04
Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/filters Tag:
ANT_16_BRANCH TokenFilterTest.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/filters Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
mbenson 2004/04/20 15:12:09
Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH build.sh
Log:
Sync with HEAD.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.35.2.4 +1 -1 ant/build.sh
Index: build.sh
mbenson 2004/04/20 15:15:19
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
Delete.java
Log:
Sync to HEAD
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.47.2.5 +6 -2
mbenson 2004/04/20 15:18:56
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
PumpStreamHandler.java
Log:
Sync with HEAD
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.14.2.5 +57 -4
mbenson 2004/04/20 15:32:29
Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
PathConvert.java
docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH pathconvert.html
Added:
To rehash yet again, Peter, do I understand you
correctly to NOT have a problem with this going into
1.6.2, with the understanding that as the dynamic
stuff evolves, the advised usage pattern on mappers
can/will change? Or was there a reason you wanted to
keep any hint of this out of a 1.6.x
mbenson 2004/04/20 15:47:46
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
Project.java
Log:
Lost in last sync with HEAD
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.154.2.9 +2 -6
88 matches
Mail list logo
