Congratulations.
One minor quibble - WHATSNEW does not mention any of the significant
revisions to the starteam optional tasks, which are in this release.
-Original Message-
From: Magesh Umasankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 9:44 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Su
way, I doubt it will work since the ant code now uses
the new commons-net package names.
-------
Steve Cohen
Sr. Software Engineer
Sportvision Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sportvision.com
tasks
Steve Cohen wrote:
>
> Finally, the Library Dependencies section of
> http://ant.apache.org/manual/index.html still states that for the ftp
> and telnet tasks, netcomponents.jar must be downloaded from
> www.savarese.org/oro/downloads. However, the code of the ant tasks has
&g
ommunicate with an admin. Can someone provide one?
Thanks.
-------
Steve Cohen
Sr. Software Engineer
Sportvision Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sportvision.com
Please note: As a result of the merger of
Ignite Sports and Sportvision, my email address
h
I'm trying to build from the latest cvs sources and I get this the following.
Can someone explain what is going on? I thought that perhaps an
older version of ant was being found in the build process and I made sure that
it wasn't, but that did not help matters.
[scohen ~/ant]$ ./build.sh -Ddi
Never mind. Stupid error. Never put ant.jar into lib/optional!
-Original Message-
From: Steve Cohen
Sent: Tue 3/4/2003 10:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:Can't build from source
I'm trying to build from the latest cvs sources and I get this the
I use Konqueror sometimes but I don't see the problem you see. Can you
describe a little more fully?
-Original Message-
From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 3/6/2003 3:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:Ant homepage in konqueror
Does anyo
In Konqueror 3.0.3-14 (Redhat Linux 8.0) I definitely do not see what you are
describing.
-Original Message-
From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 3/6/2003 6:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:RE: Ant homepage in konqueror
Steve Cohen
For those who have not been following the traffic on this bug can
someone please have a capsule summary about what breaks when you use it?
Is it the only which is affected, or are things like
affected as well?
I am trying to decide whether to pull 1.5.2 internally here. I don't
think we use mu
Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those who have not been following the traffic on this bug can
> someone please have a capsule summary about what breaks when you use
> it? Is it the only which is affected, or are things like
> affected as wel
Well, sure, not everyone. But not anyone?
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Stockall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:38 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: 1.5.3?
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 09:32 AM, Steve Cohen wrote:
>
> I don't understand why
. Not all ftp servers use the unix format.
Please send me any such instances you may know of.
See
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14333
Steve Cohen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
-Original Message-
From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 12:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support
Hi,
This is to formalize the discussions which have gone on on the dev and
user
lists. Please indicate your vote. Everyon
I hadn't looked at this package from Borland yet but I took a look.
What you want to get it the "StarTeam Universal Client" download
(521ue.tar.gz) off the "downloads" page after you register.
Untar/unzip this, and run "java setup" against the untarred stuff and it
will install the program for yo
be preserved.
There is probably some reason why this cannot work but I can't think of
it, so I will throw it out to the group for discussion.
Have at it! Please, though, not too hard. :-)
------
Steve Cohen
Sr. Software Engineer
Sportvision In
using it to define project
dependencies in a hierarchical way!
Works Great!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Overridable targets?
Here is a radical idea that I'd like to kick aroun
Thanks. I knew it was a feasible idea.
-Original Message-
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Overridable targets?
Steve Cohen wrote, On 06/06/2003 16.54:
> Here is a radical idea that I'd
Please submit this as a bug report to Bugzilla. The place your patch is
changing is used in many situations other than the one you are
interested in and would almost certainly have negative consequences in
some other context. What you are trying to fix needs to be fixed in a
different way.
-
ution, the build I made did not make a class file for it.
How do I do a build of ant that includes this file? Is it the same deal
as with the optional tasks, that you must put some jar on the classpath
in order to build this file?
Thanks
--
Steve Coh
OK, I'll try that, but I should point out that this is not mentioned in
the manual.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:46 PM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: CommonsLoggingListener
Steve Cohen wrote:
> I made a
This is my first attempt to build ant in awhile.
I downloaded a completely fresh source tree from cvs, made a couple of
extremely minor changes, and then tried to build with build.sh. The bootstrap
build successfully completes, but then when the main build starts, I get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
;ve just been unable to find the documentation?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Cohen
Sent: Sat 8/30/2003 5:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:can't build.
This is my first attempt to build ant in awhile.
I downloaded a completely fresh source tree from cvs, made
There have been some requests to add functionality to the stcheckout task (for
StarTeam) to enable checkout by a timestamp. It will not be hard to do this,
as the scenario is well-supported in the StarTeam API.
However, what about the Ant API? Is there a standard way (and
reusable/accessibl
nd removing
xml-apis.jar and Xerces.jar from the CLASSPATH of build.sh.
Hopes this helps,
Antoine
- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steve Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 7:1
t have to parse the strings back
Cheers,
Antoine
- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:58 PM
Subject: Timestamp attribute processing
There have been some requests to add functionality
te processing
Yes, if you think of a good generic routine to parse strings into dates,
then DateUtils should be the place for it.
Antoine
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: M
Actually, what about the TSTAMP formats? These are probably the most common in
Ant. I think what I will do is accept either "MMdd hhmm" or "MMdd"
unless user specifies something else. It's not much harder to do this than to
enforce one person's idea of the "right way".
-Original
1.3
-Original Message-
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 11:04 PM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: can't build ant 1.6
Steve Cohen wrote:
> I've received no replies to this, so let me try again with a little
>
to
the Starteam API.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: Timestamp attribute processing
Steve Cohen wrote:
...
> The StarTeam API uses something they call an OLEDate, which I&
M 9/2/2003, you wrote:
>Steve Cohen wrote:
>>Hmm, that's weaker than I would have expected. If I'd like something
>>a
>>little better, is your recommendation then to add to DateUtils?
>
>I guess it is time for a date type. I imagine taking java.util.Calendar
There is a task that has been deprecated, since 1.4.x, in favor of
. What is our policy on getting rid of these deprecated methods?
1.6 certainly feels like the right time to do this to me. I don't think I've
had a single support request for this antiquated task, which at any rate
precedes my
tasks policy
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is our policy on getting rid of these deprecated methods?
So far it has been "Do nothing, keep the deprecated stuff forever".
Stefan
---
re in violent agreement... ;^)
>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Gentle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 1:35 PM
>To: Ant Developers List
>Subject: Re: Timestamp attribute processing
>
>
>At 12:56 PM 9/2/2003, you wrote:
> >Steve Cohen wrot
A very minor point:
The ant manual states that the echo task's message attribute is required "unless
data is included in a character section within this element."
This appears to be false. I have by accident discovered that
has the effect of inserting a totally blank line into the output.
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi Steve,
I think you are a committer too. Feel free to edit the documentation.
Regards,
Antoine
Steve Cohen wrote:
A very minor point:
The ant manual states that the echo task's message attribute is
required "unless data is included in a charact
Dominique Devienne wrote:
unless someone comes up with a good reason
why this is a bug rather than a feature.
It's a bug if it doesn't prefix that line with [echo] in non-emacs mode.
is not much different from ${foo} with foo being
empty. If foo is empty by mistake, how will one troubleshoot
Dominique Devienne wrote:
> empty. If foo is empty by mistake, how will one troubleshoot this?
and not a blank line. Undefined properties are echoed as literal
text, not skipped.
I'm well aware of that ;-) That's why I wrote "empty", not "not
defined". As in empty string vs null string.
The
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
We should also move the starteam tasks to an antlib or or find another project wanting to have them so that we sometime reach the situation where an automated process (gump ?) could build a release candidate of ant legally on an ASF computer.
Regards,
Antoine
--
I haven't had much to do with the 1.6 release and am still using 1.5.4.
(Actually, in fact, probably 1.5.3). I don't care which manual is
online as long as I can get to the 1.5.4 manual without too much hassle.
But my question has more to do with the 1.6 documentation itself. From
following the
Jan, my comments are based on the fact that this is what I want as a
user. The point is that, as I said, I haven't been involved in 1.6
development and I don't know much, if anything, about what these
features are. So I can't write this document. But if one of the
developers who is centrally inv
to my mind.
Antoine
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. September 2003 15:51
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: RE: 1.6 migration guide?
Jan, my comments are based on the fact that this is what I want as a
user. The point is that, as I said, I have
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In other words, I'm looking for a migration guide that shows off the
> 1.6 way of doing things against the 1.5 way wherever the 1.6 way is
> more powerful,
Actually I've been thinking about putting together
This is great - pretty much exactly what I was looking for a couple of
weeks ago.
Heck, if I could ever get out from behind the workload that sits on top
of me, even I could take the time to test it. Perhaps next month.
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
connection is not reused between task
invocations.
What client and server environments are you doing this in?
Steve Cohen
Sr. Software Engineer
Sportvision, Inc.
scohenATSportvisionDOTcom
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gibb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 7:54
just basic
connection "hygiene". I won't be able to test whether it solves your
problem, but you can be the arbiter of that.
Fair enough?
Steve Cohen
Sr. Software Engineer
Sportvision, Inc.
scohenATSportvisionDOTcom
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gibb [mailto:[EMAIL
The new ant features wiki
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?NewAntFeaturesInDetail/MacroDef
says:
"If you are using as a macro substitute, you really should look into
this task. It is not only going to simplify your build files but also speed up
your builds considerably as you skip
I am now trying to experiment with some of the new features of ant 1.6. Here's
a real-world example of the difficulties of trying to replace antcalls with
macrodefs.
Given the following definitions, notice that I am trying to nest a call to the
macrodef make.precompiled.web.xml inside a call to
: Ant Developers List
Cc:
Subject:Re: Question about MacroDef vs antcall
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:18 am, Steve Cohen wrote:
> The new ant features wiki
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?NewAntFeaturesInDetail/MacroDe
>f
>
> says:
>
> "
to Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:37 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: RE: Tale from the front: macrodef nesting
> From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I am now trying to experiment with some of the new features
> of ant 1.6. He
: Tale from the front: macrodef nesting
> From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You're correct about working around this problem. However, I think
> it's still a problem that the same ${identifier} notation can either
> indicate a macrodef attribute or an a
ntoine's question is whether the new
notation would have to be scrapped for the new implementation of local
in 1.7 or whether it would still apply.
Unless this is going to delay the release for months, I would say, get
it right, now.
Steve Cohen
Sr. Software Engineer
Sportvision, Inc.
scohenATSpor
back at myself. I just got rid of one email address, and soon
I'll be forced to do so again. Can nothing be done about this?
Steve Cohen
Sr. Software Engineer
Sportvision, Inc.
scohenATSportvisionDOTcom
ED]
Subject: Re: MARC - spam enabler
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Steve Cohen wrote:
> Can't MARC be fixed to munge email addresses?
Even if it could, it wouldn't help you.
> but whenever I am replied to, my full unmunged email address gets
> published in MARC.
I've j
erent sorts of beasts and this should not be muddied.
Steve Cohen
Sr. Software Engineer
Sportvision, Inc.
scohenATSportvisionDOTcom
-Original Message-
From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: RE: attri
her. If we are going to introduce macros in ant, I think that the
clarity of knowing that they are defined at load time, and not at
runtime is an advantage.
has never been a good way to do "templates".
Although I might be open to a convincing counter-example.
Steve Cohen
Sr. Software
I don't have a vote but if I did, I'd be
[X] as textual substitution
[ ] as "real" Ant properties
-Original Message-
From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:14 AM
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] macrodef - do attributes as pr
Wouldn't you say, though, Jose, that does replace those uses
of for which had too big a footprint for the job?
-Original Message-
From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:19 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: RE: macrodef - do attrib
>> "I want macrodef for when all I need to do is to put toguether
a group of calls to other tasks in a sequence, which could be
quite complex, but it does not require any additional computation
from my part"
Hear, hear!
Used in this way, you can use ant, cutting out expensive calls and
most 's
Another non committer here.
I don't like $(x) because it looks too much like ${x}, although I
suppose I could get used to that. Therfore, I am drawn to
@{x}. ${attribute:x} is possible but way too much typing for my taste.
Abbreviated to ${att:x} or ${attrib:x} my negativity level goes down
accor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: macrodef - do attributes as properties or substitutions
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> I don't think we should need any special cludge
What about {$x}? Or is it too close to a typo for a regular property?
way too confusing, IMHO. And departs significant from our "pattern"
which seems to be
identifier type marker, open curly brace, identifier, close curly brace
The more I look at this, the clearer my clear choice becomes for @{
True, that was from the 1.4/1.5 days.
-Original Message-
From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:52 AM
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: macrodef - do attributes as properties or substitutions
> From: Steve Cohen [
Not a committer but my votes on Jose's ballots:
1) Vote on @{x} as the syntax for textual substitutions
of attributes in .
+1
2) Vote on , must include decision on syntax,
scope (i.e., passing things on & co., etc.)
I do not think all these have been settle.
0
-Original Message-
From:
Peter -
>>but if macrodef properties are to be implemented as textual substitution
>>and not as local properties, the two issues can be separated.
Did you mean to say "but if macrodef ATTRIBUTES are to be implemented as
textual substitution and not as local properties ..."
Or are you talking ab
Thanks, Jacob, for continuing to pursue this, and deepening my awareness of the
problem.
I appreciate your dilemma, even though I still agree with what has become
consensus that textual substitution is right for . The whole
business with the scope of properties is already complicated enough.
test
There are improvements to commons-net over the old NetComponents to
handle Windows FTP servers. However, the ant tasks would need to be
recoded to take advantage of these.
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 1:48 AM
To: [EMAI
prungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2003 16:14
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: RE: bug fixes!! WAS: ant 1.6beta3 released
There are improvements to commons-net over the old NetComponents to
handle Windows FTP servers. However, the ant ta
Interesting that in the past week I have heard this complaint three times,
(Bwhereas before I never heard it.
(B
(BSince I did a lot of the most recent work on the commons-net ftp parser stuff,
(Band since I will be having some time on my hands with an upcoming layoff, I
(Bwould like to tak
I have no vote, but if I did it would be +1. I was surprised to learn, a few
weeks ago, that Jose was not a committer.
-Original Message-
From: Antoine Lévy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:09 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Jose Alberto Fe
At first I thought you were making a joke, but I now see that these are
serious people. More info on this language can be found at
http://wiki.codehaus.org/groovy/FrontPage
-Original Message-
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:54 AM
To: Ant Dev
ess than a week.
It seems from this thread that these changes will come too late for ant 1.6.1.
Please correct me if that's wrong. Can someone tell me what plans, if any,
are contemplated for ant 1.6.2?
Steve Cohen
On Thursday 15 January 2004 9:50 am, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
> Hi,
On Friday 16 January 2004 4:56 am, Steve Loughran wrote:
> Steve Cohen wrote:
> > Another issue to consider. I don't know if it's strictly a 1.6.1 issue
> > or further down the line but the ant developers should consider it.
> >
> > I have been working wi
Well, we at commons-net would have been rushing the release to meet ant's
"deadline" and there are internal refactorings which we would have liked to
have included that we were planning to postpone in the rush, but now will
take the time to get right, so I doubt that commons-net-1.2.0 will be do
Please ignore. This last comment by me was added in a reply to the wrong
message.
On Friday 16 January 2004 11:18 am, Steve Cohen wrote:
> Well, we at commons-net would have been rushing the release to meet ant's
> "deadline" and there are internal refactorings which w
riday 16 January 2004 10:28 am, Peter Reilly wrote:
> Steve Cohen wrote:
> >On Friday 16 January 2004 4:56 am, Steve Loughran wrote:
> >>Steve Cohen wrote:
> >>>Another issue to consider. I don't know if it's strictly a 1.6.1 issue
> >>>or furth
I see that someone has tried to incorporate my suggestion for using the latest
commons-net.jar in order to use ant's task with NT-based servers.
However, the documentation is not quite correct. It says:
"To use the FTP task with Microsoft FTP servers, you need CVS HEAD of
commons-net and jak
Can someone please clarify the optional jar requirement for ant >= 1.6? The
manual says in one place that you must build ant with the library
dependencies present, and in another place (Installing ant-Optional Tasks) it
states that you can simply drop the dependency jar into ant's lib directory
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 10:11 am, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > While it is true that the CVS HEAD of commons-net is required and while
> > it is
> > true that jakarta-oro is required (jakarta-oro is now requir
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 8:27 pm, Steve Cohen wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 February 2004 10:11 am, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > > From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > While it is true that the CVS HEAD of commons-net is required and while
> > &g
?
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 1:05 am, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve Cohen writes:
> >You've built an interface to encapsulate the choice in regex
> > implementations with automatic checking. Sweet! Perhaps we could port
> &
On Thursday 26 February 2004 4:12 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have put together a patch for negating the selected
> > properties of a PropertySet.
>
> Sounds useful.
>
> Stefan
>
>
Thanks, got it. Duh. Properties are immutable. I wasn't thinking.
On Thursday 26 February 2004 7:15 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How do you negate a non-boolean property? How do you negate null?
>
> I
away.
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 3:28 pm, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> I suggest you create a bugzilla report (
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla) concerning this, and you attach your
> patch there.
> I am not sure however whether this problem should best be handled in the
in Ant's FTP task, for example, for these
server types as well as the original unix.
Steve Cohen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End
This will be a fix release to fix the problem introduced in 1.2.0 that it will
not compile using jdk < 1.4 and nothing else.
Details at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28775, which I've
already fixed (and verified against jdk 1.2).
Also, per the advice of Stephen Colburne, thi
pm
From: Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
The Jakarta Commons team announces the release of version 1.2.1 of the
Jakarta Commons/Net component. This release fixes recently released
version
use in Ant's FTP task, for example, for these
server types as well as the original unix.
Steve Cohen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Me
The Jakarta Commons team announces the release of version 1.2.2 of the
Jakarta Commons/Net component. This release fixes a problem introduced with
recently released version 1.2.0 in which file listings would not correctly
'remember' the current directory when no directory was specified. This ha
FTP task was broken in some cases by changes in commons-net. These were fixed
in the recent release 1.2.2 of commons-net. All that needs to happen in ant
now is for the docs to be updated to mandate use of commons-net 1.2.2.
I'd do it myself, but I'm wondering what is the status of the committ
6:33 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd do it myself,
>
> please do.
>
> > but I'm wondering what is the status of the committer vote that was
> > taken on me a couple of weeks ago.
>
>
2004 1:50 am, Conor MacNeill wrote:
> Steve,
>
> I did you a welcome to Ant email on 18-Jun to this email address.
> Anyway, whatever, the vote passed and we are glad to have you aboard as
> a committer.
>
> Conor
>
> Steve Cohen wrote:
> > Stefan -
>
+ 1
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 8:43 pm, Magesh Umasankar wrote:
> From: Stefan Bodewig
> Date: 2004-06-29 10:00:28
>
> > * Release Candidate on Friday July 2
> >
> > * If nothing major happens, Final Release on July 16.
>
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Magesh
>
> -
The new release of jakarta-commons-1.4.0 contains some features that
were specifically designed with Ant in mind. In particular the
FTPClientConfig class was designed with the thought of enabling the
enhancement of the ant task to
1. handle ftp servers with file listing formats that format da
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the next few weeks (months) I am intending to rework the
task to take advantage of these new capabilities.
Maybe Neeme Praks' patch[1] would provide a nice starting point?
Stefan
Footnotes:
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
Why not move the task or its new version into jakerta-commons and
provide us with
a ready to go feature full antlib. That would allow us to start
decoupling
things from the main ANT release.
Jose Alberto
I have not been as active in Ant circles as in the past. Is dec
Steve Loughran wrote:
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
Why not move the task or its new version into jakerta-commons and
provide us with a ready to go feature full antlib. That
would allow us
to start decoupling
things
o that release? As the author of the
commons-net code that Mr. Praks is relying on, and an Ant committer, I
would be happy to take a look at his code and "sponsor" it for the 1.6.4
release.
I realize that there may be other deadlines here. What do other Ant
committers thi
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As the author of the commons-net code that Mr. Praks is relying on,
and an Ant committer, I would be happy to take a look at his code
and "sponsor" it for the 1.6.4 release.
There is no need to sp
Neeme Praks wrote:
Steve Loughran wrote:
I worry about releasing any change to code without giving it time to
stabilise and beta test. Last minute "this won't break anything"
patches always break something. Always. At least in my experience.
If commons1.4.0 is incompatible with shipping then ye
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
