+1 from me
Peter
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.dewrote:
+1 for me
Antoine
On May 11, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org
wrote:
+1 for me
Nicolas
Le 11 mai 2014 à 12:42, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org a écrit :
+1
Peter
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) apa...@materne.dewrote:
After investing some more time and doing a bootstrap build (thanks
Antoine):
Running on Windows 7 64bit
Using Java 1.5
C:\projekte\apache-ant\ANT_193java -version
java version 1.5.0_22
Java(TM) 2
+1 Peter
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Dominique Devienne ddevie...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Nicolas Lalevée
nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org wrote:
Jean-Louis has been around for a very long time, owned committership,
contributed a lot to bring EasyAnt into the
+1 Peter
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Martin Gainty mgai...@hotmail.com wrote:
-Support your proposals in particular (and the project in general)
-Be diligent about squashing bugs (especially when they are out of
conformance with documented SPECs or JSRs)
-Be around nites and weekends
+1 Peter
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2013-11-02, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
I was just surprised to see the license file in the common folder in
the source archive rather at its root. But this is nit picking.
I think this is common (no pun
http://biggerpenissize.enhancementpills.co/eo/zhurcr.aermnb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
http://adidas.dxsmedia.net/soicm/tlu.drdgwowxfbkjgiccff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
+1 Peter
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Jesse Glick jgl...@cloudbees.com wrote:
+1; a contact at NetBeans did some sanity checking at my suggestion
(especially Javadoc generation on JDK 7u21 and 7u25) and said it was OK.
Thanks Stefan for taking the initiative on this!
+1 Peter
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.dewrote:
I plan to wait until Tuesday May 21st evening to release.
Just in case - I have seen that Monday is a holiday for some of us.
Regards,
Antoine
On May 19, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Michael Clarke wrote:
+1
' attribute to JUnit test element was already solved
isn't it ?
2013/5/6 Peter Reilly peter.kitt.rei...@gmail.com
wow, I had forgot about that!
Peter
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi,
I have committed a patch created by Peter
wow, I had forgot about that!
Peter
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.dewrote:
Hi,
I have committed a patch created by Peter Reilly back in 2007.
The bugzilla PR is 43362 [1]
If the community is happy with this change we will be able to close a
number
+1
Peter
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Conor MacNeill co...@apache.org wrote:
On 13 March 2013 04:03, Bruce Atherton br...@callenish.com wrote:
I'd like to nominate Michael Clarke as a committer. Not only has he
revamped our testing infrastructure to make it compatible with JUnit4, he
+1
Peter
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart
jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on the release as is too
Works perfectly in easyant :)
2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
+1 on the release as is.
On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
You can veto
Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
So does that mean you would be opposed to removing these deprecated items?
Matt
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Peter Reilly
peter.kitt.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
The only problem is the there are a lot
of tasks out there in the wild that have
The only problem is the there are a lot
of tasks out there in the wild that have not
been compiled in a very long time. (I know
I have uses a number), These
will most likely use the deprecated methods,
especially in regard to handling of properties
and references.
Peter
2012/8/20 Martin Gainty
java 6 allows @Override in this case, but java 5 does not.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:53 PM, jgl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jglick
Date: Thu Aug 16 13:53:07 2012
New Revision: 1373836
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1373836view=rev
Log:
JDK 5 javac is apparently buggy; @Override
+ 1 and move to 1.9
Yey, we may even dabble in these new fangled generics
Peter
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Dominique Devienne ddevie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-01-27, Jesse Glick wrote:
As suggested in 1.8.3
+1 Peter
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Conor MacNeill co...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 17:22, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Should this be released as the Compress Antlib 1.1?
+1
Conor
-
To
+1
Peter
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Conor MacNeill co...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 15:15, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-08-13, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
svn tag (rev 1157319):
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/antlibs/antunit/tags/1.2/
tarballs and
Personally I think that ant should move to java 1.5 for ant 1.9.
Peter
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
ZIP64 is the nickname for the changes to the ZIP archive format that are
necessary to support files 4GB (both individual entries and
You have not passed in the classpath to the taskdef.
You need to do something like:
taskdef classname=net.sf.antcontrib.logic.For name=for
classpath
pathelement location=lib/ant-contrib-1.0b3.jar/
/classpath
/taskdef
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Ajitesh ajites...@yahoo.com wrote:
It depends on the cost of .size(), it is done on each run of the body
and cannot be optimized by the compiler (.size() could change during
the loop).
A common pattern is to do:
for (int i = 0, len = x.size(); i len; ++i) {
...
}
Peter
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert
+1 Peter
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Conor MacNeill co...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 16:02, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
after fixing the NOTICE file and applying the trademark policy I've
rebuilt the distribution from svn revision 1064451 of
I thought that there was a problem with the removal
of out-of-target reference resolution with moving
to ant 1.8.0.
...
ah, looking at the bug report, that is still an issue.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49659
Peter
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert
+1
Peter
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-12-20, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
The first release candidate of ant 1.8.2 got several binding +1s and a
-1 concerning an issue with the use of the JUnit task with selective
methods and JUnit 4 style
+1
Peter
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
the people behind Bushel[1] want to donate their code to Ivy[2] and
before I can start the formal IP clearance process we can and should
vote whether we want to accept the donation at all.
So, do we want
+1
Peter
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Bruce Atherton br...@callenish.com wrote:
+1
On 22/08/2010 10:15 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
I've created new distribution artifacts without the empty WHATSNEW file
and a README.html that points to the docs directory.
I'd like to release
+1
Peter
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Bruce Atherton br...@callenish.com wrote:
+1
On 24/08/2010 11:53 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
The VSS antlib[1] should be promoted from sandbox
[1]http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/antlibs/vss/
We have a policy of keeping stupid historical defaults.
Peter
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Jesse Glick jesse.gl...@oracle.com wrote:
On 08/18/2010 02:27 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
I would still guess that more builds than not DON'T need to compile
against Ant itself.
Of course; at least
+1 release the manuals
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I don't really think this requires a vote since I've just repackaged
existing distributions (see buildfile at the end of the mail for
details), but it won't hurt.
In
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Bruce Atherton br...@callenish.com wrote:
On 19/06/2010 11:38 AM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
1. Should the following commercial tasks be dropped from being distributed
with the Ant release?
[ ] Continuous/Synergy tasks: CCMCheckin, CCMCheckout, CCMCheckinTask,
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Bruce Atherton br...@callenish.com wrote:
On 01/06/2010 7:51 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-05-29, Bruce Atherton wrote:
I'd like to discuss whether to move all of the commercial tasks out of
Ant core/optional libraries and putting them each into their
That is not what I meant.
I meant dependences for maven pom files.
We would have an jar file (for example ant-commons-logging.jar that
did not contain any classes) and have a pom file like:
project
parent
groupIdorg.apache.ant/groupId
artifactIdant-parent/artifactId
We could have dummy jar's for dependences.
Peter
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Jesse Glick jesse.gl...@oracle.com wrote:
On 05/14/2010 04:00 PM, Peter Reilly wrote:
Personally I think that there should be only one ant.jar file ... and not
loads of itty-bitty ones.
This would break
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello Jesse,
Jesse Glick wrote:
In relation to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49287:
Ironically enough, I find the Ant build script to be a poor example of
an Ant script. The system of
+1 to all and +1 to doc howto
Peter
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Kevin Jackson foamd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This wasnt part of the vote, but I am also
+1 for putting the upload procedure in a common.xml
+1
+1 for using Ivy for uploading
+1
+1 for including a src.zip into our
Personally I think that there should be only one ant.jar file (as
was the case in ant 1.5 - well two)
and not loads of itty-bitty ones.
Peter
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jesse Glick jesse.gl...@oracle.com wrote:
In relation to https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49287:
I am not too sure that I like the warning:
/home/preilly/scm/svn/nft-trunk/build.xml:61: warning:
'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to
build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds
when using javac without setting the includeantruntime attribute.
(not too sure if this was
ok, scratch that, the warning happens for ant 1.8.0 as well :-(
So +1 for the 1.8.1 release.
Peter
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Peter Reilly
peter.kitt.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not too sure that I like the warning:
/home/preilly/scm/svn/nft-trunk/build.xml:61: warning
Just did not like the presence of the warning,since
it will hit nearly every ant build file out there.
Still it is in ant 1.8.0 so no need to change it now.
Peter
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jesse Glick jesse.gl...@oracle.com wrote:
Peter Reilly wrote:
I am not too sure that I like
+1 for fixing
Peter
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-04-23, Dominique Devienne ddevie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
[...] Personally I think the changed behavior isn't a bad
I agree, datatypes are mutable, properties are not, why add this complexity
of final.
Peter
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I was thinking that ant datatypes are currently de-facto mutable by default.
Maybe we are making this too complex.
Of
Could be the change I made to the propertymap the other day.
Peter
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
many of the latest Gump builds stopped working, see
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/project_todos.html and look at
those with duration in
I think that we will just have to put the old code (1.7) back in.
Peter
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-02-18, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
This problem happens in src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/property/
ResolvePropertyMap.java .
Great news.
Peter
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-02-24, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
To account for the bug report it may be a good idea to ignore existing
properties only if we are importing with a prefix.
and look for an
I think that I was trying to allow the map to be used in a stack
of property maps. But looking at the original code
for Property in 1.7, I got it wrong, so I have removed
the test.
Peter
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Peter Reilly
peter.kitt.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like a bad bug
Looks like a bad bug.
Will have a look during the weekend.
Peter
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello Matt,
Datum: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:27:26 -0600
Von: Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Convenience
I have installed and used 1.8 rc for our build env.
Everything looks good.
so +1 from me
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Martijn Kruithof j...@apache.org wrote:
On 2-2-2010 2:12, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
The new build incorporates the fix for the junit stack traces issue.
a candidate
When using ant 1.7, did you see a warning about references?
Peter
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Suman N suma...@curamsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
We are testing the compatibility of our build scripts with Ant 1.8 RC1 and
we encounter the following error when referring a path refid in our
-Original Message-
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:peter.kitt.rei...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 January 2010 15:27
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: Gertting Reference ejb.classpath not found while using Ant
1.8 RC1
When using ant 1.7, did you see a warning about references?
Peter
On Thu, Jan 28
+1
Peter
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 AM, jan.mate...@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
+1
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:co...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 2. November 2009 23:06
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] New committer - Jon Schneider
Matt Benson
+1
Peter
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2009-10-09, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
As a first step I propose to promote the Antlib from the sandbox to a
proper Antlib.
+1
Stefan
using target name=x if=${foo}
seems to be very very strange..
Peter
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2009-09-24, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
target if=${foo}/
will only be executed if a property named ${foo} exists (unexpanded) -
Yes, I think that I added the null return to allow local properties.
Peter
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matt Bensongudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 9/1/09, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
Subject: PropertyHelper API
To:
It is very very unlikely that cobertura is the problem
Most likely the use'r code was compiled against one
version of junit and tested with a different version.
Peter
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Matthias,
On 2009-05-14, Walter, Matthias
This is in the ant manual.
http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTypes/antlib.html#currentnamespace
There is a special xml namespace (ant:current) for typedefs defined
within an antlib.
The namespace is only active during the processing of the antlib.
Peter
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Gilles
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Kevin Jackson foamd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
with Ant 1.7.0 we changed the bzip2 code to make it a lot faster and
reverted the change in 1.7.1 because it was creating corrupt archives.
Meanwhile the Hadoop folks have been using the 1.7.0 code and claim
they
Excellent.
My tests have shown no problems.
Peter
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
committed as revision 759138
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For
I am testing this patch at the moment.
I am running the bz2 compress with the new code, uncompessing
using the command line bunzip and comparing the
files.
The test is over ~100, 000 files, and I have had to
use the computer for other things - so the test
is not yet complete.
project
to
hudson.
Peter.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Jesse Glick jesse.gl...@sun.com wrote:
Peter Reilly wrote:
a question that has been asked a number of times on the hudson mailing
list is what is the schema of the xml that junit generates.
BTW:
https://hudson.dev.java.net/nonav/issues
a question that has been asked a number of times on the hudson mailing
list is what
is the schema of tthe xml that junit generates.
I have had a quick look at the code, and noticed that there two related schemas.
1) the xml that junit generates
and
2) the xml that junitreport uses internally.
Perhaps we should check the target attribute - but this is very much
an edge case.
Peter
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2009-02-18, Jesse Glick jesse.gl...@sun.com wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
this should be the equivalent of compiling a
The version is 1.5 - and it is not meant to be replaced!
Peter
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Dominique Devienne ddevie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM, jgl...@apache.org wrote:
+private static final byte[] PACKAGE_INFO_CLASS_HEADER = {
+(byte) 0xca, (byte)
Neat,
that is a a brilliant solution!
Peter
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:35 PM, jgl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jglick
Date: Thu Feb 12 22:35:18 2009
New Revision: 743910
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=743910view=rev
Log:
#43114: ensuring that package-info.class is created/touched
some of the findbugs issues are a little too severe.
Do we really need to copy the arrays??
Peter
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:30 PM, bode...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bodewig
Date: Thu Feb 5 12:30:01 2009
New Revision: 741089
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=741089view=rev
Log:
fix
Also sax is stream based - so the first errors that
ant would see would be the fact that the first element is
not project the malformed xml document would
not be noticed at this stage as processing of the
document would stop.
Peter
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL
Fire away, this is what the sandbox is for.
Peter
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
At work we have a need for this, so I've thrown it together just now
(very rough, but it does what it says on the tin).
It's using the Yahoo JavaScript and CSS
+1 Peter
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
since no new issues have been found with the beta that has been out
for three weeks, I've created archives from the same code base and
uploaded them to http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/antunit11/
I
Is it not costly (as in very costly) to get the canonical path ?
I would be for the lowest tech possible here.
Peter
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as Issue 45499 shows
yikes!
Peter
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bodewig
Date: Mon Aug 25 07:04:01 2008
New Revision: 688729
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=688729view=rev
Log:
reallyput the value into the map.
Modified:
+1
Peter
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
just in case your mail client doesn't like the way our mailing list
manager deals with multipart/signed messages (just like mine, it
simply doesn't see the signed
sounds good (am catching up on my e-mail queue).
Peter
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant's trunk has been using a snapshot of AntUnit's trunk for quite
some time now, so we seem to need some unreleased feature. How about
making it available to
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest the following changes:
* lock the listener collection in the add/remove listener methods,
in fireMessageLogged lock the listeners, clone them,
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I finally got the time to work out what was wrong with the DOMUtilTest failure
I should have some time to look into the other failures for 1.7.1 -
but this was the only new failure since the last beta release
I
This is due to:
[au:antunit] Build File:
/srv/gump/public/workspace/ant/src/tests/antunit/types/scriptcondition-test.xml
[au:antunit] Tests run: 16, Failures: 0, Errors: 14, Time elapsed: 0.316 sec
[au:antunit] Target: testBeanshellReturnTrue caused an ERROR
[au:antunit]at line 100, column 42
I have seen this once or twice, but have no idea why it happens.
Peter
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's ExecTaskTest failing and I have no idea why.
Some kind of race condition that might get LeadPipeInputstream get
closed before it should?
Thanks
Peter
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
for those who haven't noticed: Since I disabled execution of the
FailureRecorder test when running JUnit4 test-ant now passes in Gump.
This means every nag mail generated for test-ant hints at
ant attribute names are case insensitive.
I do not like long attribute names - although I have created
a fair few my self.
Peter
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Stephane Bailliez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Xavier
As far as I am aware, there is currently no nightly build.
The easiest way to get a version is to check out the ant trunk and compile
it yourself.
- use java5 to have the same compiler as the ant release
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ echo $JAVA_HOME
/usr/java/jdk5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ mkdir y
[EMAIL
+1 from me.
Peter
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Author: peterreilly
Date: Thu Mar 27 10:09:53 2008
New Revision: 641903
URL:
Text files do not specify an encoding.
It this utf-8 or win1252 or latin1 ?
Peter
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: hibou
Date: Tue Mar 25 09:11:41 2008
New Revision: 640878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=640878view=rev
Log:
Encoding fix
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We've recently integrated Jepp (http://jepp.sourceforge.net/) into our
use of Ant via the BSF engine. This is very useful because we use Python
for scripting quite a lot and it allows
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Available tarballs at http://people.apache.org/dist/ant/v1.7.1beta2/
are ready:
yes [ x ] (+1)
no [ ] (-1)
+1
+1
Peter
Stefan
Opps, sorry, I commited an jar that was compiled with javac5.
Fixed now.
Peter
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Gump Integration Build
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit
HI all,
I have gone tru the optional ant tasks/types with a view
to allow an complete automatic compilation
of ant from svn and use of fetch.xml.
In current ant trunk, only the netrxx and image optional
tasks cannot be so built.
netrexx:
Is is possible to revert these changes
(unassinged - 1.8.0)
Most of these bugs will not get fixed in ant 1.8.0 and setting
the target release ensures that when ant 1.8.0 comes around,
the bugs have to be updated again).
(In general I do not like the custom of mass updates of
the bug database
Hi Kev,
I see that you have updated the beta (to 2).
http://people.apache.org/~kevj/ant/ant-1.7.1beta2.tar.gz
Peter
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started to make the 1.7 branch
Yes,
I have made a change to the build.xml file.
It is up to kev to see if this should be in the ant 1.7.1 release.
Peter
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Vladimir Mihai Pacuraru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Good catch.
This problem is in the docs directory of the tar.*
(or zip)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's time to go ahead and push out 1.7.1 for wider testing.
good.
Over to the vote:
That's not how this works. You create the tasballs (and
Thanks,
this has already been noticed and a fix will be in ant 1.7.1.
In the meantime, the service nested element should not be used.
Peter
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Robert Koberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use the nested service element in the jar class. It
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Loughran wrote:
Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi,
As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late).
I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks.
The current 1.7.1 trunk is
x yes +1 Peter
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late).
I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks.
The current 1.7.1 trunk is now locked for further changes (99.9% test
ANT svn (trunk) supports loadFromXML in the properties task.
This has not been ported to the ANT 1.7 branch.
Peter
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Thorsten Scherler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:56 -0800, Bruce Atherton wrote:
What I think you are missing is that the XML
On Feb 13, 2008 3:06 PM, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 3:35 AM, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even though only votes cast by PMC members are binding [12], all votes are
welcome and important to us.
+1. --DD
+1 Peter
Mmm,
the manual states:
A target also has the ability to perform its execution if (or unless)
a property has been set. This allows, for example, better control on
the building process depending on the state of the system (java
version, OS, command-line property defines, etc.). To make a target
On Jan 28, 2008 10:55 PM, Vallon, Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When import is given the same path twice, it skips the second import.
However, if import is given a path to the original (top-level) build-file,
it does not consider it a duplicate import, and imports it (again) ...
unless
On Jan 16, 2008 10:28 AM, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Reilly wrote:
I do not think we should do this.
As far as I know, there is no super compelling reason to make ant only
work on java 1.4 +,
I was curious as it is a lot easier to do relative URLs
I use gmail, and find the JIRA conversation per message a mess.
I would be -1 until this has been resolved.
Peter
On Jan 16, 2008 4:47 PM, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 5:25 PM, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know its been discussed before, but I'd to
On Jan 17, 2008 12:19 AM, Bruce Atherton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Reilly wrote:
There are a woe-full amount of java 1.3 users as well..
Peter
And of 1.2 users that we abandoned during the 1.7 release. But the
thinking at that time, and I think it holds up here as well
On Jan 15, 2008 12:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. What is the minimum version of Ant that 1.8 is targeting?
I'm not sure whether we've made any decision to change what we have
as
a minimum requirement for 1.7.
we dropped 1.2, so it is 1.3
1 - 100 of 1211 matches
Mail list logo
