On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have a real-world candidate for
antlib resource=.. classpathref=.. /
ant-contrib's cpptasks, this includes custom tasks and types.
Stefan
Costin Manolache wrote:
I would include filters, mappers, conditions and selectors to
the list.
I would exclude them :-)
Taks, types, mappers, filters, whatever are just ant components -
and they shouldn't need a special syntax from user perspective.
That is what I meant to say.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have a real-world candidate for
antlib resource=.. classpathref=.. /
ant-contrib's cpptasks, this includes custom tasks and types.
though in that particular example, it'd be nice if the types were
Hi All,
(Please forgive my newbie-ness).
I have developed an Ant Task for the Artima SuiteRunner and I'd like to
submit it. Perhaps a Committer might a respond directly and I'll e-mail them
a zip file containing the code? (Didn't want to send a zip file to a few
hundred people...!)
Thanks,
Developers List
Subject: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Hi All,
(Please forgive my newbie-ness).
I have developed an Ant Task for the Artima SuiteRunner and I'd like to
submit it. Perhaps a Committer might a respond directly and I'll e-mail them
a zip file containing the code? (Didn't want to send a zip
be interested in knowing what other see in it. Thanks, --DD
-Original Message-
From: Adam Duffy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:09 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Hi All,
(Please forgive my newbie-ness).
I have developed an Ant Task
on that matter?
Thanks,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 15:20
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Could someone please explain me what SuiteRunner brings to the table that
JUnit doesn't I've
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Sorry, I didn't mean at all to put down your contribution. I was more asking
an off topic question about SuiteRunner. My personal opinion on SuiteRunner
is not binding in any way the Ant community at large, or the committers
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Adam Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Myself and Leigh Ishikawa (Adding 'setName' support to the
xmljunitresultformatter.java) have not received any response to our
contributions. Can someone please advise?
First advice would be to be more patient, four hours isn't that
Duffy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:00 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Thanks Dominique,
I wasn't aware of that policy regarding 'external' tasks (since I only
started subscribing recently). I'll ask Artima.com to see if their
interested
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said (one more ;-), if Ant ever comes up with an easier way to
integrate third party tasks
Easier than taskdef resource=...classpath ...//taskdef?
Almost impossible.
Stefan
and build.xml, and avoid having to dump everything in AntLib.
I believe it can and should be easier and more flexible. --DD
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
On Wed, 26
I meant ANT_HOME/lib. --DD
-Original Message-
From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:37 AM
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Hu, not totally. If the AntLib also uses types, you need another
typedef, which
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hu, not totally.
Did I forget to put that smiley in?
Since you now use twice the classpath, if needs to be outside and
refid'd.
No, you'll need to use the loaderref attribute.
And what about the junit task?
Easy in Ant
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
m Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner
Task
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
snip
test and batchtest in Ant support if/unless properties
and I always
have it set up to be able to run
I do it with one line in my build.xml:
test todir=${junit.results} name=${testcase} if=testcase/
and a small change to the batchtest task:
batchtest todir=${junit.results} unless=testcase
Both of these in are my test target, so I just run ant with
ant -Dtestcase=com.whatever.TestWhatever test
: Artima SuiteRunner Task
I do it with one line in my build.xml:
test todir=${junit.results} name=${testcase}
if=testcase/ and a small change to the batchtest task:
batchtest todir=${junit.results} unless=testcase
Both of these in are my test target, so I just run ant with
ant -Dtestcase
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:08 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Nathaniel Spurling wrote:
Regarding suiterunner vs JUnit, I prefer the suiterunner API:
test methods can throw Exceptions
having to dump everything in
AntLib.
I believe it can and should be easier and more flexible. --DD
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
On Wed, 26
Chris Reeves wrote:
Ah - ok.
And proof that no matter how tattered the pages of my copy of JDWA are,
there's more gems to be found within.
Thanks!
Chris
I believe that particular snippet is a near-direct cut and paste from
ant's own build file. So the credit goes to whoever set up the junit
Costin Manolache wrote, On 26/03/2003 18.46:
Dominique Devienne wrote:
Hu, not totally. If the AntLib also uses types, you need another
typedef, which should also probably needs a loaderref. Since you now use
twice the classpath, if needs to be outside and refid'd.
In ant1.6 the difference
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said (one more ;-), if Ant ever comes up
peter reilly wrote:
I would include filters, mappers, conditions and selectors to
the list.
I would exclude them :-)
Taks, types, mappers, filters, whatever are just ant components -
and they shouldn't need a special syntax from user perspective.
We shouldn't treat them ( or types, tasks )
]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
I would include filters, mappers, conditions and selectors to
the list.
A relatively simple mod to the core ant makes this
possible (bugzilla 17199) basically get ConditionBase.java
25 matches
Mail list logo
