Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do we have a real-world candidate for
ant-contrib's cpptasks, this includes custom tasks and types.
though in that particular example, it'd be nice if the types were also
accessible to the .net tasks, tha
Costin Manolache wrote:
> > I would include filters, mappers, conditions and selectors to
> > the list.
>
> I would exclude them :-)
>
> Taks, types, mappers, filters, whatever are just ant components -
> and they shouldn't need a special syntax from user perspective.
That is what I meant to say..
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we have a real-world candidate for
>
>
ant-contrib's cpptasks, this includes custom tasks and types.
Stefan
micTag
-Original Message-
From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
I would include filters, mappers, conditions and selectors to
the list.
A relatively simple mod to the core ant makes
peter reilly wrote:
> I would include filters, mappers, conditions and selectors to
> the list.
I would exclude them :-)
Taks, types, mappers, filters, whatever are just ant components -
and they shouldn't need a special syntax from user perspective.
We shouldn't treat them ( or types, tasks )
> > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:27 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Costin Manolache wrote, On 26/03/2003 18.46:
Dominique Devienne wrote:
Hu, not totally. If the AntLib also uses types, you need another
, which should also probably needs a loaderref. Since you now use
twice the classpath, if needs to be outside and refid'd.
In ant1.6 the difference between t
Chris Reeves wrote:
Ah - ok.
And proof that no matter how tattered the pages of my copy of JDWA are,
there's more gems to be found within.
Thanks!
Chris
I believe that particular snippet is a near-direct cut and paste from
ant's own build file. So the credit goes to whoever set up the
task in
d should be easier and more flexible. --DD
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
>
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL P
can and should be easier and more flexible. --DD
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
>
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienn
-
From: Nathaniel Spurling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:08 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Nathaniel Spurling wrote:
>
> Regarding suiterunner vs JUnit, I prefer the suit
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Nathaniel Spurling wrote:
>
> Regarding suiterunner vs JUnit, I prefer the suiterunner API:
>
> test methods can throw Exceptions, also assertion failures
> generate Exceptions so you can put one catch(Exception) at the bottom
> o
ist
> Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task
>
>
> I do it with one line in my build.xml:
> if="testcase"/> and a small change to the batchtest task:
>
>
> Both of these in are my "test" target, so I just run ant with
> ant -Dtestcase=com.whate
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 12:01 PM, Chris Reeves wrote:
Erik -
How do you set it up to run a single test on demand?
Like this:
http://www.ehatchersolutions.com/JavaDevWithAnt/junit.html
I do it with one line in my build.xml:
and a small change to the batchtest task:
Both of these in are my "test" target, so I just run ant with
ant -Dtestcase=com.whatever.TestWhatever test
Easy! And thanks to Erik's book for the tip.
s
-Original Message-
From: Chris Reeves [mailto:[E
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:55 AM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
> and in Ant support if/unless properties
> and I always
> have it set up to
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Nathaniel Spurling wrote:
Regarding suiterunner vs JUnit, I prefer the suiterunner API:
test methods can throw Exceptions, also assertion failures
generate Exceptions so you can put one catch(Exception) at the bottom
of your method and print out a
pers
List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
m>
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hu, not totally.
Did I forget to put that smiley in?
> Since you now use twice the classpath, if needs to be outside and
> refid'd.
No, you'll need to use the loaderref attribute.
> And what about the task?
Easy in Ant
Unless the tasks require changes to core ant :-)~
Peter.
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 16:26, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That said (one more ;-), if Ant ever comes up with an easier way to
> > integrate third party tasks
>
> Ea
I meant ANT_HOME/lib. --DD
-Original Message-
From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:37 AM
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Hu, not totally. If the AntLib also uses types, you need another
, wh
and avoid having to dump everything in AntLib.
I believe it can and should be easier and more flexible. --DD
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task
On Wed, 2
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That said (one more ;-), if Ant ever comes up with an easier way to
> integrate third party tasks
Easier than ?
Almost impossible.
Stefan
From: Adam Duffy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:00 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Thanks Dominique,
I wasn't aware of that policy regarding 'external' tasks (since I only
started subscribing recently). I'll ask Ar
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Adam Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Myself and Leigh Ishikawa ("Adding 'setName' support to the
> xmljunitresultformatter.java") have not received any response to our
> contributions. Can someone please advise?
First advice would be to be more patient, four hours isn't th
26 March 2003 15:37
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Sorry, I didn't mean at all to put down your contribution. I was more asking
an off topic question about SuiteRunner. My personal opinion on SuiteRunner
is not binding in any way the Ant community at
inique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 15:20
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Could someone please explain me what SuiteRunner brings to the table
that
JUnit doesn't I've looked at it quite a bit, and maybe beside
bet
t: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Hi Dominique,
I would like to know what other people think too.
If at the end of the day, the developers of Ant do not wish to use the code
I have written, that is fine with me. I only want to contribute to the
development of Ant - which I am really fond of. As does
that matter?
Thanks,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 15:20
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Could someone please explain me what SuiteRunner brings to the table that
JUnit doesn&
ert)...
I'd be interested in knowing what other see in it. Thanks, --DD
-Original Message-
From: Adam Duffy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:09 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Hi All,
(Please forgive my newbie-ness).
I have d
h 2003 11:09
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Artima SuiteRunner Task
Hi All,
(Please forgive my newbie-ness).
I have developed an Ant Task for the Artima SuiteRunner and I'd like to
submit it. Perhaps a Committer might a respond directly and I'll e-mail them
a zip file containing the co
Hi All,
(Please forgive my newbie-ness).
I have developed an Ant Task for the Artima SuiteRunner and I'd like to
submit it. Perhaps a Committer might a respond directly and I'll e-mail them
a zip file containing the code? (Didn't want to send a zip file to a few
hundred people...!)
Thanks,
Adam
32 matches
Mail list logo
