I think its a good idea to have a scheduling operator when you need to
start a part of the DAG when some trigger happens (for eg. FileSplitter
identifying new files in FS) and otherwise bring it down to save resources.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Timothy Farkas <
I hope I'm not commenting too late on this thread.
>From the above discussion, it looks like the requirement is to have a
custom tuple which has following 2 capabilities to influence streaming
engine on:
1. When to send it (between windows/within window)
2. Where to send it (all partitions, some
+1.
- File Integrity: PASS
- No Binary file in the package: PASS
- Compilation: PASS
- Unit tests: PASS
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:20 AM, David Yan wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Build passed
> - All unit tests passed
> - Successfully ran pi demo with Apex Core 3.4.0.
>
>
I'm -0 on this idea.
Here is the reason:
Unless we see a real case where users want to see everything on latest,
this branch might quickly become low hanging fruit and eventually get
obsolete because its anyway a "no gaurantee" branch.
We have a bunch of dependencies which we'll have to take
Yes there is no clash with calcite integration. Calcite is a query planner
converts SQL to a relational algebra... This is different.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Priyanka Gugale wrote:
> I don't know much about Calcite, but reading abstract, calcite seems to be
> for
APEXMALHAR-2128 is already done. Somehow the status did not go to resolved.
Changed it now.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Yogi Devendra wrote:
> APEXMALHAR-2116
> https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/326
>
> @Ram
> Your review comments are incorporated.
+1 for the idea.
Are there any in the list that one can see as conflicting with our own
environment variables? For e.g. LOGNAME?
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Pramod Immaneni
wrote:
> How about allowing specification of all environment variables supported by
> YARN
Nice feature. +1 for it.
One question, instead of creating a new tuple type, can this be done by
modifying current checkpoint tuple?
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Yogi Devendra
wrote:
> This will be awesome feature. I can see the usecases for production
> scenario
Hi All,
I wanted to give update on Apex-Calcite Integration work being done for
visibility and feedback from the community.
In the first phase, target is to use Calcite core library for SQL parsing
and transformation of relation algebra to apex specific component
(operators).
Once this is
Congrats Dev!!
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Shubham Pathak
wrote:
> Congratulations Dev !
>
> Thanks,
> Shubham
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Bhupesh Chawda
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Dev!!
> >
> > ~ Bhupesh
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 11,
+1. This is a really good starting point to cleanup malhar.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:06 AM, David Yan wrote:
> Hi Lakshmi,
>
> Thanks for volunteering.
>
> I think Pramod's suggestion of putting the operators into 3 buckets and
> Siyuan's suggestion of starting a shared
Strongly +1 for this.
For 1, can the mail be sent to someone who is mentioned in the PR? So for
e.g., if I mention @PramodSSImmaneni , then Pramod will be part of PR email
notification all further back and forth communication for that PR.
@Pramod, just using your name as an example.. :)
-
Hi Pradeep,
This is a great content to add to the documents. These are the common set
of errors which might get googled and hence great to get indexed as well.
You can take a look at: https://github.com/apache/apex-core/tree/master/docs
The docs for apex reside there in markdown format.
mmits@apex which would
> > have full archive of comments?
> >
> > New JIRA, PR can be sent to both dev, commits.
> >
> > ~ Yogi
> >
> > On 13 July 2016 at 10:22, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@datatorrent.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > &
+1 on merging.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Amol Kekre wrote:
> +1 on merging it. This is a big feature addition.
>
> Thks
> Amol
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Siyuan Hua wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > We should merge this ASAP.
> > I don't
Hi All,
I just came across https://builds.apache.org/ and am curious to know what
it is used for. There are quite some projects listed there.
Anybody has any idea what is this used for?
Can we leverage this service provided by ASF Build Services, if we see any
use?
Here is the wiki for the
;
> > Thks
> > Amol
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Priyanka Gugale <
> priya...@datatorrent.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <
> >
ache.org> wrote:
> +1 to have this feature.
>
> -Priyanka
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Pramod Immaneni <pra...@datatorrent.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@apache.org>
> > wro
Hi Santhosh,
It seems that your YARN does not have enough resources available for
allocating memory for 2 application.
When you kill the first application, the memory is regained by yarn and
then allocated to the second application.
You can try to give more memory to yarn if your system allows
er properties of the
> data that can be useful by the schema receiver to process the data (for
> instance, a delimiter for CSV record stream).
>
> Thanks,
> Sergey
>
> On 2017-01-25 01:47 (-0800), Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@datatorrent.com>
> wrote:
> > Thank you all f
I agree with the requirement. But I think the requirement here is superceed
by requirement at
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1e282047399558a4f04aab186c0d986114d353dcaf6d6c76a2a3a35@%3Cdev.apex.apache.org%3E
Having PojoInnerJoin to emit a POJO instead of map overrides this.
I suggest to do
Certainly good and convenient for application/operator developers to use.
But could someone include this dependency in apex application project and
use it?
If yes, then I would prefer to keep this outside of Apex in general and let
the user use it for convenience.
-Chinmay.
On Wed, Feb 22,
Dear Community,
Currently PojoInnerJoin accumulation is accepting 2 POJOs but emitting a
Map.
I think it should be emitting POJO instead of Map.
Please share your thoughts about this.
Thanks,
Chinmay.
APEXMALHAR-2409 Created.
I'll create a PR soon.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@datatorrent.com
> wrote:
> Thanks guys. I'll create a jira and create a PR for it soon.
>
> Ajay, btw this is not much related to Schema discovery design... This is
t 7:34 AM, AJAY GUPTA <ajaygit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, it should be emitting a POJO. This POJO can then be further used to
> > join with a third POJO stream, thus behaving like a DB join.
> >
> > It would be best if we can incorporate this into Schema Disc
+1 for the feature in general.
Though I have a question about it: Lets say 10th operator in the DAG
initiates the shutdown.. And operator being in quite downstream as compared
to Input Operator, it might be fairly behind in window it is processing.
What happens to the data being already processed
Dear Community,
Now that Apex core 3.5.0 is released, is it good time to upgrade Apache
Bigtop for Apex to 3.5.0?
-Chinmay.
_
> Sent with difficulty, I mean handheld ;)
>
> On 19 Jan 2017 2:28 pm, "Tushar Gosavi" <tus...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for including Apex 3.5 in Bigtop.
> >
> > - Tushar.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Chi
Hi All,
Currently a DAG that is generated by user, if contains any POJOfied
operators, TUPLE_CLASS attribute needs to be set on each and every port
which receives or sends a POJO.
For e.g., if a DAG is like File -> Parser -> Transform -> Dedup ->
Formatter -> Kafka, then TUPLE_CLASS attribute
er/operator developer would access the tuple object in case he wishes to
> do something with it?
>
>
> Ajay
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Currently a DAG that is generated b
I agree that the discussions are important. There are currently discussions
being happening over mailing list but some topics might be get missed and
we should improve there. The tasks should be brought to community before
the design starts and then mature the design through community discussion.
org/ ?
>
> On 1/19/17, 8:12 AM, "Pramod Immaneni" <pra...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <
> chin...@datatorrent.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Dear Community,
> >
>
t; >
> > * accumulations.getSubOutput(maxTag, outputValues)*
> >
> > *accumulations.getSubOutput(minTag, outputValues)*
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Bright
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <
>
Thomas,
I agree with you that we need this migration to be done but I have a
different opinion on how to execute this.
I think if we do this in phases as described above, users might end up in
more confusion.
For doing this migration, I think it should follow these steps:
1. Whether for operator
Few points/questions:
1. Agree with Yogi. Approach 2 does not look clean.
2. Do we need "recordwidthlength"?
3. "recordseperator" should be "\n" and not "/n".
4. In general, providing schema as a JSON is tedious from user perspective.
I suggest we find a simpler format for specifying schema. For
Strongly +1 on this. One thing that proves this is useful for Apex is
hadoop streaming where python is used write map-reduce jobs. This not only
will increase the reach in development world but also would be appealing to
administrators to write an app as they are usually aware of python.
Few
Hi All,
I'm getting a weird error in travis CI build related to connection to
repository.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/163438909/log.txt
Error is as following:
Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process
(default) on project
time to remove "Review Only" for this PR and propose this PR
for including in apex malhar.
Please share your opinion.
Thanks,
Chinmay.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@datatorrent.com>
wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> I've created a review only PR f
ood
to create a Review Only PR for first cut of calcite integration.
Please share your opinion on above.
Thanks,
Chinmay.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@datatorrent.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I wanted to give update on Apex-Calcite Integration work be
I would like to help in contributing to this feature.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Sasha Parfenov wrote:
> +1 on both executing Python code in an operator and high level API for
> constructing Pipelines in Python.
>
> There is a large user base of engineers and data
Hi All,
For testing of calcite generated DAG, I want to verify whether the correct
DAG is created with right operators and streams and whether properties are
set properly.
Is there any PrintWriter for the LogicalPlan object printing components of
DAG?
If not, I am planning to write one for
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Tushar Gosavi <tus...@datatorrent.com>
wrote:
> Hi Chinmay,
>
> take a look at following gist for example.
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/8df8e05ffc16e620bbc030e1034da3c4
>
> - Tushar.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Chinm
inted easily.
> But for verification check if right components are added in DAG by
> examining dag structure than printing it.
>
> - Tushar.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar
> <chin...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Fo
However, I think it's possible to implement some kind of watermark
> > > > > generation in the WindowedOperator itself if that knowledge is not
> > > > > available from the input. It's actually already doing that if you
> > call
> > > >
>> > > > > 20%3D%203.5.0%20AND%20project%20%3D%20APEXMALHAR%20AND%
> >> >> > > > 20resolution%20%3D%
> >> >> > > > > 20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > Pl
as well as cluster mode.
I request everyone to please review the PR and provide feedback.
Thanks,
Chinmay.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@datatorrent.com
> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I wanted to give a quick update on Apex-Calcite integration work.
>
&g
+1.
- Chinmay.
On 3 Oct 2016 7:25 a.m., "Amol Kekre" wrote:
> Ananth,
> This would be great to have. +1
>
> Thks
> Amol
>
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Munagala Ramanath
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Kudu looks impressive from the overview, though
ears more dirty to me.
>
> Regards,
> Hitesh
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Yogi Devendra <
> devendra.vyavah...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > If we specify order of the fields and length for each field then start,
> end
> > can be computed.
> >
Hi Vlad,
In one of the PR the travis build is passing but Jenkins build is failing.
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/409
Is it observed somewhere else too?
Any idea why that is the case?
Thanks,
Chinmay.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Vlad Rozov wrote:
>
+1 for 2.6
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Bhupesh Chawda
wrote:
> +1 for 2.6
>
> ~ Bhupesh
>
> On Oct 4, 2016 4:14 AM, "Siyuan Hua" wrote:
>
> > +1 for 2.6.x
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Pramod Immaneni
> >
+1.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Thomas Weise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm proposing another release of Malhar in November. There are 49 issues
> marked for the release, including important bug fixes, new documentation,
> SQL support and the work for windowed operator state
Hi All,
With a lot of Apache projects making use of inner class in Java 7 and
Decarative programming feature of Java 8 to define stages in the pipeline,
I would like to propose a small additional to our existing compositional
APIs allowing it to define processing stages inline.
I've created a
Very nice ..:)
I would like to contribute as well.
Thanks,
Chinmay.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:19 AM, David Yan wrote:
> I would also like to contribute. Thanks!
>
> David
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Thomas Weise wrote:
>
> > FYI, the first cut
Are you talking about apex cli (the one present in apex-core) to support
both?
As both high-level API and SQL are in malhar, wouldn't there be circular
dependency issue?
Beside the possible issues, this is a great idea.
Though, I'll suggest to have a seperate cli for high level and SQL in
Dear Community,
Thank you for all the contribution in making the first PR to get merged for
adding SQL Support in Apex.
The support for SQL in Apex is present here:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/tree/master/sql
As a part of PR review and other discussion a number of followup items that
pra...@datatorrent.com>
wrote:
> Yes, I think it could be useful for core as well.
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > @sanjay, yes we can define the process around this.
> >
> > @pramod, Well, I said apex-m
Yes... That's the mail.. There are couple if related conversations can be
seen here too:
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?legal-disc...@apache.org
I suggest we take a look at it and do the needful from our end too.
-Chinmay.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Amol Kekre
Dear Community,
I'm working on adding support for heuristic watermark in Windowed Operator.
Heuristic watermark give users of WindowedOperator a way to logically
determine whether watermark condition is met or not by inspecting the
tuples received.
This can act as a replacement for or way to work
+1... Good to have.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Devendra Tagare wrote:
> +1
>
> ~Dev
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Priyanka Gugale
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for documenting this.
> >
> > I had covered the basic cycle of launch in couple of
+1.
Verified md5, asc, sha.
Malhar is building correctly.
Successfully launched pi demo.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Thomas Weise wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> Please vote on the following Apache Apex Malhar 3.6.0 release candidate.
>
> This is a source release with
t;tus...@datatorrent.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1, but can you change name of HeuristicWatermark to
> > WatermarkGenerator as the purpose of
> > this interface is to generate watermarks.
> >
> > - Tushar.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 a
pra...@datatorrent.com>
wrote:
> So it would be like a yellow pages for the apex ecosystem. Sounds like a
> good idea. Why limit it to malhar?
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Community,
> >
> > This is in
Dear Community,
This is in relation to malhar cleanup work that is ongoing.
In one of the talks during Apache BigData Europe, I got to know about
Spark-Packages (https://spark-packages.org/) (I believe lot of you must be
aware of it).
Spark package is basically functionality over and above and
Hope I'm not responding to this very late.
We have a PR open for initial cur of Apex-Calcite integration in Malhar:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/432
Maybe that can give you some content to include in your topic.
As for upcoming work, there are APEXMALHAR jiras created with "sql"
Any feedback is welcome.. :)
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.j...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aha,thanks. that makes sense.
>
> I saw Julian review the PR. Do you need me to still look at it?
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chi
Dear Community,
While testing kafka related endpoint code for Apex-Calcite integration, I
found an interesting embedded kafka implementation over the internet and I
used it in my code.
The implementation is based on ready to use EmbeddedZookeer and KafkaServer
from mvn dependency
sh
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Pradeep A. Dalvi <p...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for Option 1 to use conn.getMetaData()
> >
> > --prad
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@apache.org>
> > w
Hi Hitesh,
Instead of limiting the row count please use one of the following 2
approaches:
1. ResultSet rsColumns = null;
DatabaseMetaData meta = conn.getMetaData();
rsColumns = meta.getColumns(null, null, "tablename", null);
while (rsColumns.next()) {
-1 for automatic schema creation...
Moreover, I am wondering whether asking user to create a dt_meta table is
right way. From an admins perspective, an ask for creation of meta table
looks wrong to me. dt_meta table is created for the purpose of exactly once
but it does not hold any user data..
Hi,
I'm finding malhar build to fail because of rat check failing in demos/
folder.
Moreover, I cannot see demos/ folder in
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar
I want to confirm whether its in apache repository itself OR its my
environment issue.
Please reply.
Thanks,
Chinmay.
;
> -Priyanka
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@datatorrent.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Community,
> >
> > Currently Apache Apex does not have a deliverable tarball which bundles
> the
> > dependent jars and apex cli which
Dear Community,
Currently Apache Apex does not have a deliverable tarball which bundles the
dependent jars and apex cli which user can just download and get started
with.
Having this would be also be useful for current integration with Apache
Bigtop as well. Currently in bigtop, the bigtop build
+1 for the best effort with warnings.
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Pradeep Kumbhar
wrote:
> +1 for the best effort with warnings as default behavior and an optional
> flag for Validate & Fail (Ajay's suggestion)
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Mohit Jotwani
+1
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Mohit Jotwani
wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Mohit
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Bhupesh Chawda
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > ~ Bhupesh
> >
> >
> > ___
> >
>
+1 for pramod's proposal.
On 19-May-2017 4:51 AM, "Sanjay Pujare" wrote:
> +1 for Pramod's proposal for impersonation.
>
> I have an issue with Sandesh's suggestion about making the new behavior as
> the default (or only) behavior. This will introduce incompatibility
Hi Thomas,
Even I'm currently occupied and won't be able to work on this as of now.
Also, you're already collaborator on docker-pool repository.
-Chinmay.
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Aniruddha Thombare <
anirud...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently preoccupied, won't be able
Congrats Ananth!!
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Priyanka Gugale wrote:
> Congrats Ananth!!
>
> -Priyanka
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Weise wrote:
>
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Apex is pleased to
> > announce Ananth
Congrats Tushar!!
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Chaitanya Chebolu <
chaita...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
> Congratulations Tushar!!!
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Venkatesh Kottapalli <
> venkat...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Tushar!
> >
> > -Venky
> >
> > On Fri, Nov
+1.
- Chinmay.
On 25 Oct 2017 9:20 pm, "Chaitanya Chebolu"
wrote:
> +1 on new release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Vlad Rozov wrote:
>
> > +1.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Vlad
> >
> >
> > On 10/25/17 08:21, Amol Kekre wrote:
>
Yes Thomas. I'm going to create a docker image.
I was hoping that I can create the docker for 3.7.0 from new changes in
master which pulls dist atrato instead of creating from my repo. This will
act as a pilot for building docker from apex-core repo as well. Let me know
if this is fine.
Regards,
+1 for approach 1. As Thomas mentioned, I think there metrics layer should
be abstracted out from its implementation. This way one can plugin
different metrics systems in apex.
Also keep in mind that there is a lot of code which uses AutoMetrics
annotations. We should help a smooth transition
ince we don't have the docker files in apex-core/release-3.7, my
> suggestion to create the branch in your repo, as done till now.
>
> You can still pilot the build for the latest image from apex-core/master
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <
>
branch shortly so that we can start working
against it.
-Chinmay.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 7:07 PM Chinmay Kolhatkar
wrote:
> So here is how it'll be:
> 1. ReactJS application can be compiled for production builds. The output
> is set of html+css+compressed js files. It can also out
ay
> > information in a browser, where they will be hosted is irrelevant. They
> > can be hosted by stram, but it should be possible to host them
> > externally without making modificaitons. If this is the case, I don't
> > have any objections to the proposal.
> >
>
ozov
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Clarification: I am -0 on making UI part of the stram. I am +1 on
> > > >> providing reference webUI application outside of the stram.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you,
> > > >>
> > >
Chinmay Kolhatkar
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created following jiras encompassing the requirements (To be picked
> up in order):
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2558
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2559
>
> I'll start adding subtask
gt; >>
> > > > > >> >> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Hitesh Kapoor <
> > > > > forhitesh...@gmail.com
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>> Congra
Hi Community,
I want to propose a feature in apex-core to have a UI component in stram.
This is influenced by how basic runtime information is shown on UI by spark.
This includes following features:
1. Webpage will be hosted by stram and will be available for user to view
in one of the two ways
Hello Community,
I want to propose following improvements for apex-core build and related
steps:
1. Most (probably all of the open source project) has the a binary release
package of the software and not just the source release package. Currently
we have only source package. Luckily there are
+1 for the release.
- Chinmay.
On 18 Jan 2018 8:58 pm, "Tushar Gosavi" wrote:
> +1 for the release
>
> Regards,
> - Tushar.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 3:28 AM, Amol Kekre wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thks,
> > Amol
> >
> >
> > E:a...@datatorrent.com
+1.
On Sat, 26 Jan 2019, 11:56 pm amol kekre +1 for this proposal. The only caveat I have is
> -> "acceptable performance and resolving logical flaws identified during
> the review process"
>
> is subjective. Functionally working should cover any logical issues.
> Performance should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chinmay Kolhatkar updated APEXMALHAR-2105:
--
Assignee: shubham pathak
> Enhance CSV Formatter to take in schema simi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chinmay Kolhatkar resolved APEXMALHAR-2105.
---
Resolution: Done
Fix Version/s: 3.5.0
The PR is merged
Chinmay Kolhatkar created APEXMALHAR-2117:
-
Summary: JDBCLoader for Enricher should generate default queryStmt
even when value is empty string
Key: APEXMALHAR-2117
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chinmay Kolhatkar resolved APEXMALHAR-2111.
---
Resolution: Done
Fix Version/s: 3.5.0
> Projection Opera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-1818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15390972#comment-15390972
]
Chinmay Kolhatkar commented on APEXMALHAR-1818:
---
Hi,
I had a quick discussion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-1818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chinmay Kolhatkar reassigned APEXMALHAR-1818:
-
Assignee: Chinmay Kolhatkar
> Integrate Calcite to support
Chinmay Kolhatkar created APEXMALHAR-2151:
-
Summary: Enricher - Add delimited file format support to FSLoader
Key: APEXMALHAR-2151
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2151
Chinmay Kolhatkar created APEXMALHAR-2153:
-
Summary: Add user documentation for Enricher on apex docs
Key: APEXMALHAR-2153
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2153
Project
Chinmay Kolhatkar created APEXMALHAR-2152:
-
Summary: Enricher - Add fixed length file format support to
FSLoader
Key: APEXMALHAR-2152
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2152
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo