Sander Striker wrote:
...
*) The performance gain is in not having to walk the list of nodes in
apr_pool_clear as mentioned above. Maybe this is not really a performance
win, but more of a better devision of processing time. apr_pool_clear
and apr_pool_destroy have less work to do, this cou
> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 December 2001 20:34
> On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:29 am, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:23:44AM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
> > > >It is the apr_pool_init function, which is creating the lock with a NULL
> > > >fname, so
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:34:01AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > The only place where I see this happening is in the shmem.c code.
> > Other than that I don't see anywhere else in APR/APR-UTIL that
> > is creating a CROSS_PROCESS or LOCKALL scoped lock.
> >
> > Perhaps it's just the accept mutex in
On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:29 am, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:23:44AM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
> > >It is the apr_pool_init function, which is creating the lock with a NULL
> > >fname, so it is a bigger problem than just the pool lock.
> >
> > Why is the pool initializati
On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:23 am, Brian Pane wrote:
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:11 am, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> >>>The biggest problem is that this would change the API for the one
> >>>function that must be in every APR program.
> >>>
> >>>Thoughts?
> >>
> >>Is it the
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:23:44AM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
> >It is the apr_pool_init function, which is creating the lock with a NULL
> >fname, so it is a bigger problem than just the pool lock.
>
> Why is the pool initialization creating a crossprocess lock?!
The only place where I see this ha
Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:11 am, Aaron Bannert wrote:
The biggest problem is that this would change the API for the one
function that must be in every APR program.
Thoughts?
Is it the lock routine or something specific to apr_pool_init that is
creating the tmpfile? In genera
On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:11 am, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > The biggest problem is that this would change the API for the one
> > function that must be in every APR program.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Is it the lock routine or something specific to apr_pool_init that is
> creating the tmpfile? In ge
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:16:56AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > I don't think it would be worth the time and effort.
> > running with a full /tmp is not very healthy for the system at all.
> > maybe a better error message in apr_initialize saying 'unable to create
> > lockfile /tmp/apr
> > is a
On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:03 am, Ian Holsman wrote:
> On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 10:59, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > This took me a while to track down, but I did it. One of the engineers
> > at Covalent tried to start Apache with a full /tmp file system. None of
> > his Apache directives pointed to /t
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:59:20AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> This took me a while to track down, but I did it. One of the engineers at
> Covalent tried to start Apache with a full /tmp file system. None of his
> Apache
> directives pointed to /tmp, so he assumed he would be okay. Unfortunat
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 10:59, Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> This took me a while to track down, but I did it. One of the engineers at
> Covalent tried to start Apache with a full /tmp file system. None of his
> Apache
> directives pointed to /tmp, so he assumed he would be okay. Unfortunately,
> he was
This took me a while to track down, but I did it. One of the engineers at
Covalent tried to start Apache with a full /tmp file system. None of his Apache
directives pointed to /tmp, so he assumed he would be okay. Unfortunately,
he wasn't, the server was giving him an error because /tmp was ful
I've looked at apr_file_mktemp (need it for mod_perl 2.0). I guess I
don't understand something. Why the developer is supposed to do the work
of mktemp? It wants to receive a path-template, but how am I supposed to
know what path will work across platforms? e.g. /tmp is not available on
all pla
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Thanks for the fix!
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
After dupping the fd, the first read was getting 0 as a first char. Of
course other platforms should probably also fixed.
While I had the time to commit this, I can't look into the other
platforms at the moment. If no
Thanks for the fix!
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After dupping the fd, the first read was getting 0 as a first char. Of
> course other platforms should probably also fixed.
While I had the time to commit this, I can't look into the other
platforms at the moment. If nobody does anyt
Cliff Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >{
> > -apr_os_proc_t var;
> > -memset(&var, 0, sizeof var);
> > +apr_os_proc_t var = 0;
> >sprintf(buf, "%" APR_OS_PROC_T_FMT, var);
>
> Can you actually assi
> From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 December 2001 09:50
> > From: Brian Pane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 06 December 2001 07:52
>
[...]
> > >APR_DECLARE(void *) apr_palloc(apr_pool_t *pool, apr_size_t size)
> > >{
> > >
> >
> >
> > >/* Reset the active no
> From: Brian Pane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 December 2001 07:52
> Sander Striker wrote:
>
> > This is the 3rd round of the pools rewrite. This time I have gotten
> > rid of all tabs (grmpf) and followed some suggestions by Justin.
> >
> > I'm reposting the whole file instead of a di
After dupping the fd, the first read was getting 0 as a first char. Of
course other platforms should probably also fixed.
Index: srclib/apr/file_io/unix/filedup.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apr/file_io/unix/filedup.c,v
retrieving
Sander Striker wrote:
This is the 3rd round of the pools rewrite. This time I have gotten
rid of all tabs (grmpf) and followed some suggestions by Justin.
I'm reposting the whole file instead of a diff, since this is
the first time it is posted inline. Hopefully the interested lot
out there have
APRUTIL LIBRARY STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/11/29 10:25:27 $]
Release:
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
* Need apu_compat.h to track the latest renames
Status: someone want to step up to diff na
APACHE PORTABLE RUNTIME (APR) LIBRARY STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/12/05 16:54:23 $]
Release:
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8 : released November 20, 2000
2.0a7 : released October 8, 2000
2.0a6 : released August 18, 2000
2
On 6 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>{
> -apr_os_proc_t var;
> -memset(&var, 0, sizeof var);
> +apr_os_proc_t var = 0;
>sprintf(buf, "%" APR_OS_PROC_T_FMT, var);
Can you actually assign 0 to an apr_os_proc_t on all platforms (or at
least all pl
24 matches
Mail list logo
