Re: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_pools.c

2001-12-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > striker 01/12/18 10:55:39 > > Modified:include apr_pools.h >memory/unix apr_pools.c > Log: > Enable apr_pool_tag by default, instead of only when APR_POOL_DEBUG > is defined. Thank you very much (especially since when I tried turning o

RE: APR_POOL_DEBUG and apr_pool_tag()

2001-12-18 Thread Sander Striker
> From: Brian Pane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 December 2001 19:44 > To: dev@apr.apache.org > Subject: Re: APR_POOL_DEBUG and apr_pool_tag() > > > Jeff Trawick wrote: > > >"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>This sounds like good moment to introduce for APR_POOL_TAG. >

Re: APR_POOL_DEBUG and apr_pool_tag()

2001-12-18 Thread Brian Pane
Jeff Trawick wrote: "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: This sounds like good moment to introduce for APR_POOL_TAG. fine by me... One of the things that made the original pool code difficult to maintain was that it had so many different ifdefs for debugging. I think it would be cleaner to

Re: APR_POOL_DEBUG and apr_pool_tag()

2001-12-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This sounds like good moment to introduce for APR_POOL_TAG. fine by me... -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/ Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Re: APR_POOL_DEBUG and apr_pool_tag()

2001-12-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
"David Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What about a similar thing to allow us to tag threads as well? the > information could be included when spewing out debug information and may be > useful. maybe it should be a thread attribute? This may not be necessary since there is a pointer to the

RE: APR_POOL_DEBUG and apr_pool_tag()

2001-12-18 Thread Sander Striker
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Trawick > apr_pool_tag() would seem to be very cheap in terms of space and > time as well as potentially useful for debugging problems in > production builds. > > Does it really need to be noop-ed if APR_POOL_DEBUG isn't defined

Re: APR_POOL_DEBUG and apr_pool_tag()

2001-12-18 Thread David Reid
What about a similar thing to allow us to tag threads as well? the information could be included when spewing out debug information and may be useful. Just a thought. david - Original Message - From: "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 5:01 PM Subjec

APR_POOL_DEBUG and apr_pool_tag()

2001-12-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
apr_pool_tag() would seem to be very cheap in terms of space and time as well as potentially useful for debugging problems in production builds. Does it really need to be noop-ed if APR_POOL_DEBUG isn't defined? I'd like to see it always and I'd like to tweak Apache to use it in more places. I se

apr_ring.h

2001-12-18 Thread David Reid
Anyone object if we move it into apr from apr-util? I ask as I'm using the macros in the rewrite of my conditional code and the rings may be useful in other places as well. APR seems like a better venue. I guess if we do move the file, can someone with enough karma do it so we preserve the histo