On Sunday 30 September 2001 11:30 pm, Greg Stein wrote:
Will do ASAP.
Ryan
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 10:19:11PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >...
> > Okay, this has been decided by the PMC. We will accept this project.
> > The name that the PMC would like to use for this project is apr-serf. I
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 October 2001 08:27
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 01:20:52PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
>>> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: 29 September 2001 07:19
>>...
>>> Okay, this has been decided by the PMC. We will accept this
>>> p
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 10:19:11PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
>...
> Okay, this has been decided by the PMC. We will accept this project. The
> name that the PMC would like to use for this project is apr-serf. I will
> create
> a repository with nothing but a STATUS file in a few minutes. I will
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 01:20:52PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 29 September 2001 07:19
>...
> > Okay, this has been decided by the PMC. We will accept this project. The
> > name that the PMC would like to use for this project is apr-serf.
On Saturday 29 September 2001 08:28 am, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 10:19:11PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > Okay, this has been decided by the PMC. We will accept this project.
> > The name that the PMC would like to use for this project is apr-serf. I
> > will create a reposi
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 10:19:11PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> Okay, this has been decided by the PMC. We will accept this project. The
> name that the PMC would like to use for this project is apr-serf. I will
> create
> a repository with nothing but a STATUS file in a few minutes. I will also
> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 September 2001 07:19
> On Wednesday 26 September 2001 05:55 pm, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 September 2001 05:45 pm, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > > > I'm still in favor of apr-client. If we want to rename the top-level
> > > > CVS dir
On Wednesday 26 September 2001 05:55 pm, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 September 2001 05:45 pm, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > > I'm still in favor of apr-client. If we want to rename the top-level
> > > CVS directory at some point, then fine...
> >
> > Okay, assuming the APR PMC wants to take it
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 11:43:33PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>...
> Think _lightweight_ guys ... if this gets unmanageable, it might need to
> become it's own project.
I think lightweight in terms of "HTTP and its extensions (HTTPS, DAV, etc)"
*only*.
Once you move into other protocols,
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:45 PM
> > I'm still in favor of apr-client. If we want to rename the top-level CVS
> > directory at some point, then fine...
>
> Okay, assuming the APR PMC wants to take it on as a responsibility.
+1 here, since t
On Wednesday 26 September 2001 05:45 pm, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > I'm still in favor of apr-client. If we want to rename the top-level CVS
> > directory at some point, then fine...
>
> Okay, assuming the APR PMC wants to take it on as a responsibility.
I'll check this, and report back the result
> I'm still in favor of apr-client. If we want to rename the top-level CVS
> directory at some point, then fine...
Okay, assuming the APR PMC wants to take it on as a responsibility.
Roy
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 07:36:50PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > I agree with Roy about this. This doesn't really have anything to do
> > with creating a portability run-time. It really should be an httpd
> > sub-project.
>
> The only distinction I can
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 04:22:46PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>...
> > Nah. This has utility outside of httpd. Specifically, Subversion is an
> > excellent candidate. I also know that Covalent has a similar library that
> > they use internally ("apua", I believe). So that is candidate #2. And th
> Independent of httpd effectively means APR. I guess you could be an httpd
> subproject, but this has nothing to do with an HTTP server.
>
> [ there is no way the board would establish a new PMC for this, speaking as
> one of those board members :-) ]
I don't see why. I don't believe umbrella
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> I agree with Roy about this. This doesn't really have anything to do
> with creating a portability run-time. It really should be an httpd
> sub-project.
The only distinction I can make in my mind is library versus application.
Around these here parts, wh
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 04:15:30PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 03:52:18PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
> > > FWIW, flood in httpd-test already has 80% of what Sander suggested.
> >
> > Sander and I already talked about stealing code from flood and mod_proxy.
> > :-)
>
> *ah
On Wednesday 26 September 2001 04:22 pm, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > > And, in discussions with Roy, I think he was thinking a client
> > > library should be a part of httpd not APR. But, I don't care
> > > one way or another. -- justin
> >
> > Nah. This has utility outside of httpd. Specifically,
On Wednesday 26 September 2001 03:21 pm, Greg Stein wrote:
> Umm... Ryan... *what* are you talking about? :-)
Ooops, you're right. I misremembered the uri parsing stuff. My fault.
Ryan
__
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL
> > And, in discussions with Roy, I think he was thinking a client
> > library should be a part of httpd not APR. But, I don't care
> > one way or another. -- justin
>
> Nah. This has utility outside of httpd. Specifically, Subversion is an
> excellent candidate. I also know that Covalent has a
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 03:52:18PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
> > FWIW, flood in httpd-test already has 80% of what Sander suggested.
>
> Sander and I already talked about stealing code from flood and mod_proxy. :-)
*ahem* ;)
In all seriousness, I think we've already got most of the code we want.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 11:14:05PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> >
> > I wish to propose a new library: apr-client.
>
> btw, I'm +1 on all points in here.
+1 from me as well.
--Cliff
--
Clif
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 03:33:12PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 03:21:42PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
> > But that said, I'm am a BIG +1 on adding an http client library into the
> > ASF's APR project. Whether people want that to go into apr-util or into a
> > new apr-cli
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 11:14:05PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wish to propose a new library: apr-client.
btw, I'm +1 on all points in here. Sander and I talked about this quite a
bit last night over IRC. I'm hoping for a general go ahead, a creation of a
STATUS and or roadmap/de
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 03:21:42PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
> But that said, I'm am a BIG +1 on adding an http client library into the
> ASF's APR project. Whether people want that to go into apr-util or into a
> new apr-client, I'm not too concerned.
FWIW, flood in httpd-test already has 80% of w
Umm... Ryan... *what* are you talking about? :-)
I do not recall ever discussing a client library in there. Nor as a
motivation for APRUTIL. I'm happy to be disproved on that :-), but I'd
rather see a separate library started for this. An http client library is a
big chunk of code.
I just counted
On Wednesday 26 September 2001 02:14 pm, Sander Striker wrote:
There is supposed to be an http client library as a part of apr-util.
It's just that nobody has actually written it yet. I would prefer to not
create another library for this, because this client lib was one of the
reasons that apr-ut
Hi all,
I wish to propose a new library: apr-client.
It is basically a http client library. I see
a direct use for at least three projects:
- mod_proxy (which has most of the code in it),
- flood (to do more flexible testing, for example
with authentication, or even ssl client auth),
28 matches
Mail list logo
