RE: [PATCH] APR Stackable Memory System

2001-05-21 Thread Greg Marr
At 12:16 PM 05/21/2001, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2001, Sander Striker wrote: > dreid> Why not stick to the standard apr format of > dreid> > dreid> apr_status_t abort_fn(char *sourcefile, int lineno); > > striker> Ahh, there is such a function? I need to do a lot of digging into > A

RE: [PATCH] APR Stackable Memory System

2001-05-21 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Sander Striker wrote: > dreid> Why not stick to the standard apr format of > dreid> > dreid> apr_status_t abort_fn(char *sourcefile, int lineno); > > striker> Ahh, there is such a function? I need to do a lot of digging into > APR. Hmm... yeah, that's a point. Then again

RE: [PATCH] APR Stackable Memory System

2001-05-21 Thread Sander Striker
> I've committed the first two patches. While I was at it, I threw in a > couple more styleguide cleanups that I spotted with the second commit. Thx. >> sms-abort.patch.2 >> Adds an abort_fn member to the apr_sms_t. This >> includes code calling the abort_fn, if present, on >> APR_ENOMEM. Th

Re: [PATCH] APR Stackable Memory System

2001-05-20 Thread Cliff Woolley
I've committed the first two patches. While I was at it, I threw in a couple more styleguide cleanups that I spotted with the second commit. On Sun, 20 May 2001, Sander Striker wrote: > sms-abort.patch.2 > Adds an abort_fn member to the apr_sms_t. This > includes code calling the abort_fn,

Re: [PATCH] APR Stackable Memory System

2001-05-20 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Sander Striker wrote: > David is gone for a week, but I already wrote some stuff > that might be worth reviewing/commiting. > > Attached are a few patches: I'll take a look at these later today and commit if nobody beats me to it. --Cliff --