Re: cvs commit: apr/build config.guess config.sub

2001-02-20 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 09:05:13PM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote: I quote from config.guess (config.sub has the same block): As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you distribute this file as part of a program that

Re: cvs commit: apr/build config.guess config.sub

2001-02-19 Thread rbb
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Brian Behlendorf wrote: On 18 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Import of platform guessing scripts from GNU libtool 1.3.5. These are in CVS because Apache runs on platforms that are not known by the GNU tools (yet). # This file is free software; you can

RE: cvs commit: apr/build config.guess config.sub

2001-02-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
-Original Message- Um... how does this not infect the APR tree with the GPL? My understanding is that we can redistribute the *output* of GNU development tools like this, but not the actual tools themselves. If we can't distribute this file, then we can't use autoconf/libtool.

Re: cvs commit: apr/build config.guess config.sub

2001-02-19 Thread Greg Stein
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 11:49:53PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote: -Original Message- Um... how does this not infect the APR tree with the GPL? My understanding is that we can redistribute the *output* of GNU development tools like this, but not the actual tools themselves. If

Re: cvs commit: apr/build config.guess config.sub

2001-02-19 Thread Brian Behlendorf
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Brian Behlendorf wrote: On 18 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Import of platform guessing scripts from GNU libtool 1.3.5. These are in CVS because Apache runs on platforms that are not known by the GNU tools

RE: cvs commit: apr/build config.guess config.sub

2001-02-19 Thread Sander Striker
Oops, sorry, I missed some mails in which you guys already resolved the problem ;-) Ignore previous message, Sander

RE: cvs commit: apr/build config.guess config.sub

2001-02-19 Thread Mo DeJong
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Sander Striker wrote: Um... how does this not infect the APR tree with the GPL? My understanding is that we can redistribute the *output* of GNU development tools like this, but not the actual tools themselves. If we can't distribute this file, then we can't

RE: cvs commit: apr/build config.guess config.sub

2001-02-19 Thread Sander Striker
Simple workaround: contact the autoconf/libtool developers and ask them to incorporate the changes. Explain to them that you will need to drop autoconf otherwise and why. Why don't you just submit your patches like everyone else? Ultimatums along the lines of accept this patch or we will