On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> Okay, people. Here is your chance to vote.
>
> add 2.0 symbol renames to ap*_compat.h:
> -0: Greg, Doug
>
I don't know if I get to vote or not, but I'm -0 anyway. :-]
--Cliff
Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, people. Here is your chance to vote.
>
> add 2.0 symbol renames to ap*_compat.h:
> -0: Greg, Doug
-0: Jeff
(-0.2 actually, but why be different)
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.ge
Okay, people. Here is your chance to vote.
add 2.0 symbol renames to ap*_compat.h:
-0: Greg, Doug
I had thought somebody cared, but if not, then I'm going to close this
issue, and toss out the ap_xml -> apr_xml renames that I included.
Cheers,
-g
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 06:28:46PM -080
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> Doug,
>
> In your big rename, you forgot to add the old->new name conversions to the
> ap*_compat.h files. (apu_compat and apr_compat)
the 1.3.x ap_* compat macros were updated to reflect the changes, e.g.
#define ap_make_array apr_make_array
became
#def
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> Yes, I was thinking the 2.0 names. Personally, I don't care about them at
> all. I'd just as soon not worry about compat names for them, but was under
> the impression that other people wanted API consistency with our previous
> 2.0 alpha releases.
it wou
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 01:44:00PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > Doug,
> >
> > In your big rename, you forgot to add the old->new name conversions to the
> > ap*_compat.h files. (apu_compat and apr_compat)
>
> the 1.3.x ap_* compat macros were upd
Doug,
In your big rename, you forgot to add the old->new name conversions to the
ap*_compat.h files. (apu_compat and apr_compat)
Were you planning to do that, or should we find a volunteer? :-)
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
