On Apr 3, 2012 9:22 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 4/2/2012 6:48 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
We're not talking about proper branch management and helpful log
messages, both of which
are a given. Instead we're talking about duplicating the revision
recorded within
On Apr 2, 2012 7:48 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
...
This project has come to an agreement in the past over how CHANGES files
are to be handled.
Blah, fucking, blah. Why are you even talking about CHANGES? I already
stated that I understand it differs in this project from how svn
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder apr-branch-1.4-fedora while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-branch-1.4-fedora/builds/29
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-fedora
Build Reason: scheduler
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder apr-branch-1.4 while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-branch-1.4/builds/32
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: ceres_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder apr-branch-1.4-fedora
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-branch-1.4-fedora/builds/30
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-fedora
Build Reason:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder apr-branch-1.4-fbsd while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-branch-1.4-fbsd/builds/28
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-fbsd
Build Reason: scheduler
Build
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder apr-branch-1.4 while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-branch-1.4/builds/33
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: ceres_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder apr-branch-1.4-fbsd while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-branch-1.4-fbsd/builds/29
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-fbsd
Build Reason: scheduler
On 4/4/2012 9:34 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Apr 4 14:34:44 2012
New Revision: 1309410
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1309410view=rev
Log:
Backport fix for apr_mcast_hops returning EINVAL from trunk
Modified:
apr/apr/branches/1.2.x/CHANGES
On 04/04/2012 04:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 4/4/2012 9:34 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Apr 4 14:34:44 2012
New Revision: 1309410
Can we please declare all prior to 1.4 branch, excepting 0.9, dead?
Fine with me.
What about 1.5.x
Is there any plan to
On 4/4/2012 10:49 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 04/04/2012 04:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 4/4/2012 9:34 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Apr 4 14:34:44 2012
New Revision: 1309410
Can we please declare all prior to 1.4 branch, excepting 0.9, dead?
Fine with me.
-Original Message-
From: grega...@apache.org [mailto:grega...@apache.org]
Sent: dinsdag 3 april 2012 6:48
To: comm...@apr.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1308910 - in /apr/apr/trunk: configure.in
include/apr_poll.h include/arch/unix/apr_arch_poll_private.h
poll/unix/pollset.c
On 4/4/2012 3:02 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: grega...@apache.org [mailto:grega...@apache.org]
Sent: dinsdag 3 april 2012 6:48
To: comm...@apr.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1308910 - in /apr/apr/trunk: configure.in
include/apr_poll.h
On 04 Apr 2012, at 3:24 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Blah, fucking, blah.
This type of comment embarrasses both the project and the ASF. If you want to
discuss an issue, please discuss the issue. As soon as emails start getting
abusive, EOT.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 18:09, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
...
This type of comment embarrasses both the project and the ASF. If you want
to discuss an issue, please discuss the issue. As soon as emails start
getting abusive, EOT.
I did discuss the issue. And then you went off about
On 05.04.2012 00:38, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 18:09, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
...
This type of comment embarrasses both the project and the ASF. If you want
to discuss an issue, please discuss the issue. As soon as emails start
getting abusive, EOT.
I did
16 matches
Mail list logo
