Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > on lines 278 and 283 you replace put with pupt for apr_os_exp_time_put
> > and apr_os_thread_put. i assume that's wrong, since i can't for the
> > life of me figure out what pupt would mean ;-)
>
> good
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:44:08PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > >
> > >> It looks like Greg has taken care of Subversion, but did anyone else see
> > >> Doug's commit message go by or did my mailer drop it on the floor?
> > >
> > > i committ
> > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> >
> >> It looks like Greg has taken care of Subversion, but did anyone else see
> >> Doug's commit message go by or did my mailer drop it on the floor?
> >
> > i committed at the top-level and it mailed the diff for everything to
> > [EMAIL PROTEC
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 09:10:48AM -0600, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Thursday, February 8, 2001, at 12:59 AM, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>...
> > sure:
> > http://apr.apache.org/~dougm/apr_rename.pl
> >
> > quick-n-dirty, but seems to work ok.
>
> It looks like Greg has taken care of Subversion, bu
Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on lines 278 and 283 you replace put with pupt for apr_os_exp_time_put
> and apr_os_thread_put. i assume that's wrong, since i can't for the
> life of me figure out what pupt would mean ;-)
good for you
if sleeping child cooperates I'll fix it up Rea
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Urgh. Guess it's time for me to subscribe to a new list.
i probably should have done two commits, the apr tree then httpd-2.0
On Thursday, February 8, 2001, at 10:36 AM, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
It looks like Greg has taken care of Subversion, but did anyone else see
Doug's commit message go by or did my mailer drop it on the floor?
i committed at the top-level and it mailed the
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> It looks like Greg has taken care of Subversion, but did anyone else see
> Doug's commit message go by or did my mailer drop it on the floor?
i committed at the top-level and it mailed the diff for everything to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> on lines 278 and 283 you replace put with pupt for apr_os_exp_time_put
> and apr_os_thread_put. i assume that's wrong, since i can't for the
> life of me figure out what pupt would mean ;-)
whoops! you're right, i'll fix that and pupt the changes bac
On Thursday, February 8, 2001, at 12:59 AM, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
+1. Wow that looks great. A toast to consistency!
i'll drink to that :)
Is there any way you could forward along the conversion script that you
used (Or is that the one you sent last week
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:59:47PM -0800, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> > +1. Wow that looks great. A toast to consistency!
>
> i'll drink to that :)
>
> > Is there any way you could forward along the conversion script that you
> > used (Or is that t
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> +1. Wow that looks great. A toast to consistency!
i'll drink to that :)
> Is there any way you could forward along the conversion script that you
> used (Or is that the one you sent last week)? This is going to break
> Subversion a bit, and maybe
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> to see the files that will change and the line number/name change:
> http://perl.apache.org/~dougm/apr_rename.txt
+1. Wow that looks great. A toast to consistency!
Is there any way you could forward along the conversion script that you
used (Or is t
to see the files that will change and the line number/name change:
http://perl.apache.org/~dougm/apr_rename.txt
feel free to shout if anything looks wrong, i won't commit for a few
hours.
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> +1 a.s.a.p.
ok, i'm planning todo it later this evening.
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 06:50:09AM -0500, Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 03:05:30PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:38:16AM -0500, Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:
> > >...
> > > +1 for this, but only if it is done soon. As Ryan said recently, APR is
> > > app
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 03:05:30PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:38:16AM -0500, Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:
> >...
> > +1 for this, but only if it is done soon. As Ryan said recently, APR is
> > approaching the Beta stage, so API's shouldn't change much. However, I
> > think
+1 a.s.a.p.
Roy
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:38:16AM -0500, Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:
>...
> +1 for this, but only if it is done soon. As Ryan said recently, APR is
> approaching the Beta stage, so API's shouldn't change much. However, I
> think this is a useful change.
A little process comment here: Ryan is a si
> > there's a number of places where apr (and httpd) is not consistent with
> > prefixes or doesn't use one at all (beyond apr_ or ap_).
> > personally, i like to see functions named with the prefix of the base type
> > (struct) they operate on if possible. for example, apr_xlate_t related
> > fu
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:21:55PM -0800, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> there's a number of places where apr (and httpd) is not consistent with
> prefixes or doesn't use one at all (beyond apr_ or ap_).
> personally, i like to see functions named with the prefix of the base type
> (struct) they operate
-
From: "Doug MacEachern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 9:21 PM
Subject: apr_ function prefixes
> there's a number of places where apr (and httpd) is not consistent with
> prefixes or doesn't use one at all (beyond apr_ or ap_).
> perso
there's a number of places where apr (and httpd) is not consistent with
prefixes or doesn't use one at all (beyond apr_ or ap_).
personally, i like to see functions named with the prefix of the base type
(struct) they operate on if possible. for example, apr_xlate_t related
functions all have an a
23 matches
Mail list logo
