On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:30 AM Ran Ziv wrote:
> The intention was not at all to rename the project - when the proposal had
> been made, the name "ARIA" was considered as well, and ARIATOSCA was the
> one chosen, for various reasons, and we should probably stick with it.
> This is actually a much
The intention was not at all to rename the project - when the proposal had
been made, the name "ARIA" was considered as well, and ARIATOSCA was the
one chosen, for various reasons, and we should probably stick with it.
This is actually a much smaller issue, not even about renaming the JIRA
project
When reviewing the incubator proposal for this I recall someone from IPMC
mention a project from Mozilla called 'Aria' and this project choosing a
different name. Arthur had then suggested 'AriaTosca' and we went ahead
with that name when setting up this podling.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Jo
All,
I'm following up on this item. There were previous discussion points about
renaming the JIRA instance from ARIATOSCA to ARIA. I've point out to the
project in the past that the rename is meant to be a thorough process - all
podling resources should be named consistently.
If its decided to