I'm confused by the conversation. Are you saying that moving ariatosca.org
to ariatosca.incubator.apache.org would increase visibility and
contributions?
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> I think what John means is that - migrate http://ariatosca.org
I think what John means is that - migrate http://ariatosca.org to
http://ariatosca.incubator.apache.org
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Tal Liron wrote:
> We have both a website and a contribution guide. How should we improve
> them?
>
> http://ariatosca.org/
>
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 7:51 AM Ran Ziv wrote:
> I don't think moving the project to Github and the issue of lack of
> discussions on the mailing list are related - we need to solve the latter
> regardless of the former.
>
>
I disagree Ran. Aria Tosca has no website, has no
Ran, I only heard about this in person from John at ApacheCon -- I have no
links for info.
For me, when I see a mirrored project on GitHub I am worried about
contributing. My first instinct is that it's actually managed elsewhere,
which would require registration and some other kind of red tape.
I don't think moving the project to Github and the issue of lack of
discussions on the mailing list are related - we need to solve the latter
regardless of the former.
Tal, I'm not sure how exactly it would increase visibility - The mirror is
as visible as the new repository would be..?
It could
One con I see is that the project already struggles with on list
discussions. We want to open up github usage, but want to make sure that
projects are communicating well, so that the source code being maintained
on github is more of a convenience. Until I see more action from AriaTosca
on this
Hi everyone,
ASF now has an option of moving the repository to be 100% hosted on GitHub,
so it won't be a mirror of the ASF repo. I think this could increase our
visibility and make the project seem more welcoming to outside
contributions. Also would make management a bit easier for us.
What do