Thanks everyone for your votes and comments. The vote has been running
for 72 hours, and has now - mostly - passed.
Here are the results:
[+1] 3 There are 3 binding votes from PMC members (David Bosschaert,
Emily Jiang, Guillaume Nodet).
[0] 0
[-1] 0
Tim Ward pointed out issues with some of the
Polling for one more +1 ... any takers? :)
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Holly Cummins
holly.k.cumm...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've staged a release candidate for the next set of application
bundle, transaction bundles, ejb bundles, jndi-url bundle, jmx
uber-bundles, and proxy uber-bundle.
+1
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Holly Cummins
holly.k.cumm...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've staged a release candidate for the next set of application
bundle, transaction bundles, ejb bundles, jndi-url bundle, jmx
uber-bundles, and proxy uber-bundle. This is a big one. I've managed
to
Hi Holly,
Everything's clean except for one possibly suspicious FAILURE, and no
errors.
Ratting
mytempdirectory/087/org/apache/aries/ejb/org.apache.aries.ejb.modeller/1.0.0/org.apache.aries.ejb.modeller-1.0.0
DEPENDENCIES LICENSE NOTICE pom.xml src target
(Suppressing RAT build output to avoid
I got this when running the verify-script.
RAT FAILURE:?
src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.aries.application.modelling.ServiceModeller
It's in org.apache.aries.ejb.modeller-1.0.0.
The file appears to have no license-header.
kind regards,
christoph
On 26/07/12 00:25, Holly
Awesome, Holly!
+1 on releasing these.
David
On 25 July 2012 23:25, Holly Cummins holly.k.cumm...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've staged a release candidate for the next set of application
bundle, transaction bundles, ejb bundles, jndi-url bundle, jmx
uber-bundles, and proxy uber-bundle. This is a
Hi,
Thanks for checking. I see the same failure, but the file is so
trivial that I decided that it didn't need a license file. (It's just
the name of a class which implements the interface of the file name.)
In fact, I'm not sure if META-INF/services even defines a comment
format.
If
I've just checked and # can be used for comments in the
META-INF/services file, so I *could* add in a license. I'm not sure
it's worth bothering, but it also might not hurt anything, and it
would keep RAT happy. What do people think?
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Holly Cummins
Sounds like a nice-to-have. I'm happy either way.
+1
On 26 July 2012 15:19, Holly Cummins holly.k.cumm...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've just checked and # can be used for comments in the
META-INF/services file, so I *could* add in a license. I'm not sure
it's worth bothering, but it also
I've staged a release candidate for the next set of application
bundle, transaction bundles, ejb bundles, jndi-url bundle, jmx
uber-bundles, and proxy uber-bundle. This is a big one. I've managed
to release almost all of blueprint except for the uber-bundle and its
compatibility bundle. I've got
10 matches
Mail list logo
