Sorry, that should be a -1 because of the bug
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 09:42, Neville Dipale wrote:
> [X] +0 binding
>
> There's a test failure on aarch64, I've opened
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1294
>
> thread
>
[X] +0 binding
There's a test failure on aarch64, I've opened
https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1294
thread 'util::bit_chunk_iterator::tests::test_unaligned_bit_chunk_iterator'
panicked at 'assertion failed: ALIGNMENT > 64',
arrow/src/util/bit_chunk_iterator.rs:470:9
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022
> In my opinion, any PMC member should be allowed to use the Twitter account
> without any other checks, balances, or friction.
I agree with this. Without objections, then, I would say we make sure
as many PMC members have access to the account as have interest. I do
not think I am empowered to
Hi,
I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation,
version 9.0.2.
This is the third RC[5] for the 9.x version. While somewhat inconvenient I
am happy to say our process has found and prevented two critical bugs prior
from being released! I hope that "third time's the
Really thanks! Yes I can confirm that.
Ian
On Wednesday, February 9, 2022, Joris Van den Bossche <
jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's not that simple though ;) For me, clicking on "7.0.0" works fine,
> and results in going to the stable docs. And the dropdown shows "7.0
> (stable)" and
I don't think memcpy is feasible. The bytes may be different for different
languages.
Many languages' compilers reorder struct fields and pad structs for
efficiency reasons so the bytes in metadata coming from language X may be
meaningless to language Y.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, 08:41 Dewey
I'm new to this discussion and Arrow generally and appreciate Joris
bringing this up. While the forward- and backward-compatability of this is
over my head, I think that it is important to provide a path for extension
types to have serialized metadata as binary because the alternatives are
(in my
There is a new report[1] of an additional issue with the release candidate.
I will look into it later today if no one else has a chance to
[1]
https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/commit/411171ac7ad3efe9391b2a0f8709f7fe97672a20#commitcomment-66299402
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 2:27 PM Jörn Horstmann
It's not that simple though ;) For me, clicking on "7.0.0" works fine,
and results in going to the stable docs. And the dropdown shows "7.0
(stable)" and "8.0 (dev)".
You might need a hard refresh of the browser page (the list of
versions might be cached).
Joris
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 07:03,
On 2022. Feb 9., Wed at 6:11, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Thanks for confirming them!
> I've pressed the "Release" button on
> https://repository.apache.org/ .
Thanks Chao for checking and Kou for publishing the artifacts!
Can we incorporate the staged artifact checking to the verification
10 matches
Mail list logo
