+1 (binding)
Verified on M3 mac.
Thank you - this one is a good one.
Andrew
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 12:18 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS.
>
> Thanks, Raphael.
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 10:12 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Verified on
t; project,
> > and that it continues to have its own release process.
> >
> > The main benefit here is that it would bring it under ASF governance and
> > allow those who have permission from their employers to contribute to
> > Apache Arrow/DataFusion to be able to help with the mai
I think it is a great idea -- github has served arrow (and datafusion) very
well in my opinion.
Specifically, having to sign up for a JIRA account (which can not be
created self-service) adds a small, but real barrier to engagement and
contribution.
Removing the barrier I think encourages more
+1 (binding)
Thank you for the quick release and response
Verified on M3 Mac
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 2:00 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M3 Mac.
>
> Thanks Raphael.
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:31 AM Raphael Taylor-Davies
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to
It is great to see some additional enthusiasm and momentum around the
Apache Parquet implementation (congratulations on the release of parquet-mr
1.14[1]!).
As activity picks up, if the desire is to build more community around
Parquet, perhaps the Parquet PMC wants to encourage moving code back
As part of being a new project, we need to submit reports to the board
every month for the first three months[1].
In the tradition of Apache Arrow, I hope the community can help draft this
report. Please take a look and add anything that might be relevant[2].
Thanks,
Andrew
[1]:
;
> > Verified on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS.
> >
> > Thanks, Andrew.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 8:04 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Verified on M3 Mac.
> > >
> > > Thanks Andrew.
> > >
&
Unfortunately it appears I made an error and forgot to update the release
version in this RC
I have started a new thread[1] for a second RC
Andrew
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0md6qyhw0hody8p0v9wddvt7vo8r8z2x
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 2:23 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> Thanks Andy, J
I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow DataFusion Implementation,
version 37.1.0.
Note this is the second RC (the first RC[4] did not include the change to
the version numbers[5] :facepalm:). I apologize for the runaround.
This release candidate is based on commit:
or your work and efforts.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:01 PM Andrew Lamb
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow DataFusion
> > > Implementation,
> > > version 37.1
+1 (binding)
I reviewed the breaking API changes and the changelog and ran the
verification scripts
Thank you Raphael
Andrew
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 6:55 AM Raphael Taylor-Davies
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Object
> Store Implementation, version
Hi,
I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow DataFusion Implementation,
version 37.1.0, a patch release with some bug fixes. Please see [4] for
details.
There is a failing CI test which only affects development tools [6].
While DataFusion is now officially its own top level Apache
ache/arrow-datafusion/issues/9691
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 3:23 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> With 30 +1 votes (18 binding by my count), and 0 -1 votes, the proposal is
> approved
>
> Thank you everyone who voted and participated in helping form the proposal
> (and the community over the
We are making a 37.1.0 maintenance release[1]. If anyone wants to add
anything or review the PRs please feel free.
Andrew
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/9904
Welcome!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 2:43 PM Ian Cook wrote:
> Congrats Sarah!
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:31 Bryce Mecum wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 3:13 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that
I agree with all the other comments on this thread
Having smaller releases is key to being able to release more frequently and
finding the relevant expertise in my opinion.
We have had separate releases / votes for Arrow Rust (and Arrow DataFusion)
and it has served us quite well. The version
+1
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 3:48 AM wish maple wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Best,
> Xuwei Fu
> ulk ingestion support for Flight SQL
>
> David Li 于2024年4月5日周五 16:38写道：
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Joel Lubinitsky has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow
> Flight
> > SQL [1]. This provides a
+1
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:55 PM Jacob Wujciak wrote:
> + 1 (non-binding)
>
> Am Sa., 6. Apr. 2024 um 01:57 Uhr schrieb Joel Lubinitsky <
> joell...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Yes, just updated both the issue and the PR.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Joel
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 7:51 PM Sutou Kouhei
The release is available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/arrow/arrow-datafusion-37.0.0
The release has also been published to crates.io:
https://crates.io/crates/datafusion/37.0.0
Thank you all for your help!
Andrew
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 4:31 PM Andrew Lamb wrote
With 4 +1 votes (3 binding) the release is approved. I will now upload to
crates.io
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 11:59 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> +1
>
> I verified on M3 mac
>
> Thanks Andy for the quick turnaround on making a new RC
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 202
+1
I verified on M3 mac
Thanks Andy for the quick turnaround on making a new RC
Andrew
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:51 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> - Hashed and signatures are OK
> - ASF headers are present on expected file
> - No binary file found in the source
Congratulations Joel.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 11:53 AM Raúl Cumplido
wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome Joel!
>
>
> El lun, 1 abr 2024, 17:18, Kevin Gurney
> escribió:
>
> > Congratulations, Joel!
> >
> >
> > From: Jason Z
> > Sent: Monday, April 1, 2024
#issuecomment-2028018095
[3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/9871
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:09 PM Wayne Xia wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Same here on x86 Linux.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 7:22 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
+1 (binding)
Thank you Andy. I likewise had to up the min stack size.
FYI we (InfluxData) are still chasing down what we think may be a
regression introduced by the TreeNode refactor [1] for certain queries. If
this turns out to be the case I will coordinate making a patch release.
Andrew
[1]
at 10:04 PM Adam C wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose a change to the FlightSQL specification as
> originally described in this Github issue [1] by Andrew Lamb. The
> specification change would allow servers to support prepared
> statements with parameters, without needi
Congratulations Bryce!
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:35 AM Alenka Frim
wrote:
> Congratulations Bryce and thank you for all your contributions!!
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 6:43 AM Raúl Cumplido
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Bryce!!!
> >
> > El lun, 18 mar 2024, 5:21, Anja escribió:
> >
> > >
+1 (binding)
I verified on an M3 mac. Thank you Raphael
Looks like a great release to me. I reviewed the changelog. Given there
were so few breaking changes, it seems like we are very close to being able
to do incremental releases (e.g. 51.1.0) which is a sign of maturity in my
mind.
Andrew
On
Update -- turns out there was already a Rust client/server -- linked to the
ticket now
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:07 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> I sadly don't have time to help with this directly, however, I did file a
> ticket with the request to help with a Rust prototype [1]. Hopefully
I sadly don't have time to help with this directly, however, I did file a
ticket with the request to help with a Rust prototype [1]. Hopefully we'll
get a taker
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5496
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 11:03 PM Ian Cook wrote:
> Update on recent progress in
We are working to incorporate all the feedback we have received so far --
thank you to everyone who commented. If you would like to participate in
this discussion, please leave your comments in github.
I expect we'll call a formal vote later in the week
Andrew
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 3:26 AM
; > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 5:49 PM Micah Kornfield <
> > > > > > > > emkornfi...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
The blog post is now live at
https://arrow.apache.org/blog/2024/03/06/comet-donation/
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:32 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> In case anyone is interested, we are working on a blog post related to
> this donation here [1]. All feedback more than welcome.
>
> [1] https:
Thanks a lot for pulling this together Adam.
I likewise took a look at the proposal and I think it looks great
(disclaimer, I wrote the original issue, so I am not unbiased). I
reviewed the spec proposal and the Rust implementation. If no one has
time to review the go implementation, I can take a
+1 (binding)
Verified on M3 mac
Thank you Raphael
Andrew
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 2:45 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M1 Mac.
>
> Thanks Raphael.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:10 PM Raphael Taylor-Davies
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a release
the initial members of the
Apache DataFusion Project:
* Andy Grove (agr...@apache.org)
* Andrew Lamb (al...@apache.org)
* Daniël Heres (dhe...@apache.org)
* Jie Wen (jake...@apache.org)
* Kun Liu (liu...@apache.org)
* Liang-Chi Hsieh (vii...@apache.org)
* Qingping Hou: (ho...@apache.org)
* Wes McKi
I will now start an official vote thread. Thank you all very much
Andrew
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 5:36 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> Thank you Wes. I have added your name to the proposed PMC.
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 4:08 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> >
> > I'd be happy to he
roject!
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 12:51 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> >
> > Congrats all! It's great to see the Arrow+DataFusion ecosystem expand in
> > this way and to bring the work under the ASF umbrella.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 5:02 AM Andrew
pective from cases in the past).
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:13 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>>
>> Wes brought up a great point on the document[1] that I wanted to discuss
>> here more broadly:
>>
>> > Others may point out that (I think) you don't have any ASF Membe
he comments - I've updated the implementation [1] and added
> > Go + integration tests. If this all checks out I'd like to start a vote
> > soon.
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/40084
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024, at 13:43, Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
tps://www.apache.org/foundation/members
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 5:10 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> An update:
>
> I have updated the proposal [1] with additional information (new
> committers Jeffrey Vo and Jay Zhan, and the new datafusion-comet repository)
>
> I plan to:
> 1
odel?
> > >
>
> > > Once DataFusion becomes a top-level project, we could move it to
> > > datafusion-sqlparser-rs — it would be a quasi-independent project just
> like
> > > how DataFusion is today w.r.t. Arrow. But it would get most benefits of
> > >
I would like to draw some additional attention to any DataFusion user who
uses the TreeNode API heavily.
There is a PR with a proposed improvement to the API in [1]. Please share
any comments you may have on the PR.
Andrew
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/8891
cessary in the Rust community, where there are many exciting
> projects, but they are almost all happening outside ASF. (This is
> exactly where Java was in ~2005. Maybe we need a rust-commons or
> rust-db?)
>
> My conclusion is to leave sqlparser-rs where it is for now, but to
> conti
/11WTNYS8KWScOt3ySTX39WVS6krPhUvHsuJRY9PZQx4g/edit
[2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/discussions/6475
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 11:19 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> Thank you very much
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 11:17 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>>
Sorry for the late reply,
I think sqlparser-rs users are quite a bit more varied than DataFusion and
there is not a large overlap between the contributors of the two projects.
I currently seem to be the one reviewing / merging most sqlparser-rs
reviews, and I would definitely love some more help.
+1 (binding)
Verified on M3 Mac
Thank you for keeping the release training humming Andy
Andrew
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:23 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M3 Mac.
>
> Thanks Andy.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 9:08 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like
Thank you -- I think the usecase is great, but agree with the other
reviewers that the name may be confusing. I left some notes on the ticket
Andrew
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 3:52 PM David Li wrote:
> I've put up a candidate implementation sans integration test [1].
>
> Some caveats:
> -
+1
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:46 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:38 PM David Li wrote:
> >
> > Paul Nienaber would like to propose explicit session management for
> Flight RPC. This proposal was previously discussed at [1]. A candidate
>
Thank you for driving this -- it will be a very valuable addition to
FlightSQL
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 1:15 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> A quick update about the ODBC driver donation:
> - I finished all required changes (ASF header everywhere, build update,
> etc)
> - I'm now
On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Jay Zhan
has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache
Arrow. Welcome, and thank you for your contributions!
Andrew
th
> each request. This sort of maps to the ticket notion already present in
> many of the APIs, but could perhaps be formalized.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Raphael Taylor-Davies
>
> On 14/09/2023 11:52, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As FlightSQL gets more w
/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/9100
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:05 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> I would like to bring attention to the project of unifying built in and
> user defined functions [1], and specifically a PR[2] that starts
> implementing that approach.
>
> Please provide any fe
itive support!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Andy, we plan to name the project Comet (BTW if you have
> > better
> > > > > > > > > suggestions please let us know). Could you help to create a
> > repo
> >
Congratulations Jeffrey! Well deserved!
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:30 PM Raphael Taylor-Davies
wrote:
> On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I am happy to announce that Jeffrey Vo has
> accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache Arrow. Welcome,
> and thank you for your contributions!
>
>
+1 (binding)
Verified in M3 Mac
Thanks Andy
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 5:35 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M1 Mac.
>
> Thanks Andy.
>
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 2:15 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Ballista
>
+1 (binding)
Verified on M3 mac
As before it seems as if python 3.11 isn't supported in the verification
script, only python 3.10. When I used 3.10 everything looks good.
Thanks a lot,
Andrew
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 7:27 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M1 Mac.
>
> Thanks
Hello,
We are thinking about a min rust version policy for DataFusion[1]. Please
leave any thoughts you would like to share on the ticket.
Thank you,
Andrew
[1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/9082
+1 (binding)
This is super exciting
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 11:00 AM Daniël Heres wrote:
> +1 (binding). Awesome addition to the DataFusion ecosystem!!!
>
> Daniël
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2024, 16:57 vin jake wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Andy Grove 于 2024年1月27日周六 下午11:43写道：
> >
> > >
If anyone is interested, here is a new blog post about the last 6 months in
DataFusion[1] and where we are heading this year.
Andrew
[1]: https://arrow.apache.org/blog/2024/01/19/datafusion-34.0.0/
I would like to bring attention to the project of unifying built in and
user defined functions [1], and specifically a PR[2] that starts
implementing that approach.
Please provide any feedback you have on the ticket or PR.
Thank you,
Andrew
[1]:
+1 (binding)
I verified it on Mac (M3).
I got the same error in test_partial_ord and I agree it looks very much the
the same as https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/8908 -- a test
only issue that should not block the release
Thanks Andy
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 10:43 AM Andy Grove
I would second this notion that manually running tests that are already
covered as part of CI as part of the release process is of (very) limited
value.
While we do the same thing (compile and run some tests) as part of the Rust
release this has never caught any serious defect I am aware of and
I sent an invite for Max.
455954986 I am not sure what you are asking -- can you please clarify?
Thanks,
Andrew
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 1:40 AM 455954986 <455954...@qq.com.invalid> wrote:
> Thank you for the invitation. No questions asked. I look forward to
> participating. What should I do
I am very supportive of this donation. I know of at least one other
DataFusion-based project, blaze-rs[1], which has the same design goal and
bringing this project into the ASF may help consolidate these efforts
As Andy said, I believe it was very valuable to have a major consumer
project (e.g.
+1 (binding)
I verified this on a Mac M3
I hit an error while running the verification scripts[1], but upon
investigation it looks like a test only issue and related to an update in a
dependent library
Thanks Raphael,
ANdrew
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5292
On Tue, Jan 9,
ch "application" (pandas, DataFusion, etc.) have their own implementation?
>
> Best regards,
> Elliot Morrison-Reed
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Lamb
> Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2024 8:22 AM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Lin
Hi Elliot,
Given your description, I agree extension types sound like they may be a
good idea, similar to geoarrow[1] for Geospatial data where there is extra
metadata[2] needed to interpret underlying types (e.g. factor and offset)
Andrew
[1] https://github.com/geoarrow/geoarrow
[2]
+1 (binding)
Thank you for helping make this happen
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:10 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1
>
> In
> "[VOTE] Accept donation of flightsql-odbc" on Fri, 05 Jan 2024 10:41:21
> -0500,
> "David Li" wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in
ng Mark. He should get back to us soon.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:38 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> >
> > Thanks JB,
> >
> > I did do a name search and posted the results here [1]
> >
> > However, I am not sure what the next steps
ve a new Apache name moving from Arrow
> DataFusion to DataFusion).
>
> Please let me know if I can help on that.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:26 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> >
> > Upon reviewing the board report template, I am pla
+1 (binding)
I verified on M3 mac, both by running the tests manually via `cargo test
--all-features` as well as running the release verification script
Thank you Raphael for all your work on this release.
Andrew
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:30 AM Raphael Taylor-Davies
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would
sal. It looks great to me too.
> I added a few comments on it.
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 3:05 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for creating the draft proposal, Andrew. I have reviewed this
> and
> > I think it looks great.
> >
> > Andy.
> >
>
t; Andy.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 4:18 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> > I had some trouble running the verification script -- got an error that
> a
> > specific version of numpy was not available. I am running on an Apple M3
> > Max.
> >
> >
I had some trouble running the verification script -- got an error that a
specific version of numpy was not available. I am running on an Apple M3
Max.
ERROR: No matching distribution found for numpy==1.21.3
However that version does appear to be available:
): Arrow PMC
We’d like to propose Andrew Lamb as the initial Chair, (and thus ASF VP)
for the DataFusion project.
Affiliations
Andy Grove (agrove): NVidia
Andrew Lamb (alamb): InfluxData
Daniël Heres (dheres): Coralogix
Jie Wen (jakevin): SelectDB
Kun Liu (liukun): Ebay
Liang-Chi Hsieh (viirya): Apple
To the best of my knowledge, the Rust crate implements the Handshake
portion of the protocol described in the Flight documentation [1]
Depending on your usecase I think your application needs to decide how to
use the Handshake message, if at all
Andrew
[1]:
ase is approved
>
> The release is available here:
>
> It has also been released to crates.io. I opted to omit arrow-avro as it
> is still a work in progress.
>
> Thank you to everyone who helped verify this release
>
> On 09/11/2023 20:37, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
This is another chain related to the previous discussion [1], about
planning to propose [2]
"graduating" the DataFusion to its own top level Apache project.
In this chain, I would like to discuss which of the current arrow
repositories[3] to propose moving to the new PMC
I propose the following
d PMC members who so desired, would start
as committers or PMC members on the new DataFusion project (assuming this
is allowed by the process)
>From what I can tell, this means the PMC would be the following from the
current Arrow PMC [3]:
Andy Grove (NVidia)
Andrew Lamb (InfuxData)
Daniël Heres
d, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:26 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Andrew.
> >
> > That does seem quite serious. I agree it would be better to hold off on
> the
> > release until this is resolved.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 1:09 PM Andrew Lamb
> wrote:
I have found a regression [1] that I think is fairly serious and should be
fixed prior to a release.
If others think we should release anyways I can plan to make a patch
release shortly with the fix
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/8532
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 2:36 AM Kun
+1 (binding)
Verified on Mac M3
Thanks for keeping things rolling Andy
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:18 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow DataFusion
> Implementation,
> version 34.0.0.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
>
ing)
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 3:11 PM Aldrin wrote:
>
> > This thread does have [VOTE] for me. does it not for you?
> >
> > Sent from Proton Mail <https://proton.me/mail/home> for iOS
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 12:09, Andrew Lamb > >
Keep Flight SQL experimental because...
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023, at 13:37, Weston Pace wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:33 AM Micah Kornfield
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:29 AM A
I agree it is time to "promote" ArrowFlightSQL to the same level as other
standards in Arrow
Now that it is used widely (we use and count on it too at InfluxData) I
agree it makes sense to remove the experimental label from the overall spec.
It would make sense to leave experimental / caveats on
Congratulations!
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 3:09 PM Kevin Gurney
wrote:
> Congratulations, Felipe!
>
> From: Daniël Heres
> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 2:59 PM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho
t;
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 3:20 AM Li Jin wrote:
> >
> > > Congrats Andy!
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 3:25 PM Weston Pace
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Congrats Andy!
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023,
I am pleased to announce that the Arrow Project has a new PMC chair and VP
as per our tradition of rotating the chair once a year. I have resigned and
Andy Grove was duly elected by the PMC and approved unanimously by the
board.
Please join me in congratulating Andy Grove!
Thanks,
Andrew
Given the constraints of not changing the existing struct definitions,
adding a new buffer seems like the only way forward from what I understand.
It is unfortunate that each array now needs need a new allocation (the
buffer lengths) when passing via FFI, but I don't have any other
suggestions
+1 (binding)
Verified on x86 mac
Thanks for doing this Andy
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 1:11 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M1 Mac.
>
> Thanks Andy.
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 7:39 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Arrow has invited
Raúl Cumplido to become a PMC member and we are pleased to announce
that Raúl Cumplido has accepted.
Please join me in congratulating them.
Andrew
I am attempting to organize a face to face meetup of DataFusion community
if anyone is interested[1] and would like to solicit input from anyone who
has it
Andrew
[1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/discussions/8152
at 2:10 PM Raphael Taylor-Davies
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Verified on x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > On 09/11/2023 20:31, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > As discussed on [5], I would like to propose a patch release
+1 (binding) on Mac x86
Thank you Raphael
Andrew
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 11:49 AM Chao Sun wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified on M1 Mac. Thanks Raphael.
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 12:47 AM Wayne Xia wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Verified on Intel Linux
> >
> > Thanks Raphael
> >
As discussed on [5], I would like to propose a patch release of Apache
Arrow Rust Implementation, version 48.0.1 to include two bug fixes.
This release candidate is based on commit:
b60fc7bb09ada1385d3542b784fff2915fbc9cff [1]
The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2].
The
Thank you for raising this Marko -- for anyone else following along there
is some great discussion on the ticket and I would encourage anyone who is
interested to share your thoughts there as well.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 7:24 PM Jeremy Dyer wrote:
> From an Arrow Datafusion Python consumer
For various reasons, I plan to make an arrow-rs patch release with bug
fixes. Please comment on the ticket[1] if you have any thoughts or
other suggestions of what to include.
Andrew
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5050
As a follow up here, I am working on an arrow 48.0.1 patch release [1] to
fix some outstanding issues and unblock the DataFusion 33.0.0 release.
Please comment on the ticket if you have any questions or other things you
would like to include in the release. Otherwise I plan to make a RC
tomorrow
I would like to bring wider visibility to a proposal[1] to unify the
function interface in DataFusion.
The TLDR is to remove BuiltInScalarFunction and ensure all functions can
implemented as `ScalarUDF`
There is a small API change to ScalarUDF proposed as well[2].
If you are interested, please
I filed https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5050 to discuss some
different possibilities (for example, do an arrow patch release or hold the
datafusion release)
Please share your thoughts on the ticket
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:51 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> I think we should create a tic
1 - 100 of 800 matches
Mail list logo
