Re: [C++] "nonexistent" or "non-existent"

2020-01-08 Thread Micah Kornfield
I also think we have "KeyError" which I think might model the same concept? On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 7:35 AM Wes McKinney wrote: > I agree using a different terminology than "nonexistent" like > "NotFound" would be good. If we use "nonexistent" then the hyphen-free > spelling seems preferred > >

Re: [C++] "nonexistent" or "non-existent"

2020-01-06 Thread Wes McKinney
I agree using a different terminology than "nonexistent" like "NotFound" would be good. If we use "nonexistent" then the hyphen-free spelling seems preferred On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 2:23 PM Micah Kornfield wrote: > > I'm not sure if all of the examples refer to the same thing, but "Not > Found"

Re: [C++] "nonexistent" or "non-existent"

2019-12-29 Thread Micah Kornfield
I'm not sure if all of the examples refer to the same thing, but "Not Found" (from http 404 error) is the most common way of expressing at least the first concept I think. On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 11:45 AM Neal Richardson < neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote: > IMO while "nonexistent" is the

Re: [C++] "nonexistent" or "non-existent"

2019-12-28 Thread Neal Richardson
IMO while "nonexistent" is the right word, neither are particularly readable or obvious in code. Is there a better word/phrase? On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 5:34 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > Hi, > > I found that we use both "nonexistent" and "non-existent" in > our C++ code base. I think that we should

[C++] "nonexistent" or "non-existent"

2019-12-27 Thread Sutou Kouhei
Hi, I found that we use both "nonexistent" and "non-existent" in our C++ code base. I think that we should use one of them instead of mixing them. "nonexistent": * Public API: * cpp/src/plasma/: plasma::PlasmaErrorCode::PlasmaObjectNonexistent "non-existent": * Public API: *