current versioning schema is the following:
>
> * 1.0.0 -> libarrow.100.0.0
> * 1.1.0 -> libarrow.101.0.0
> * 1.2.0 -> libarrow.102.0.0
>
> I'll update .deb package names when we decide this.
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In
> "Re
-> libarrow.102.0.0
I'll update .deb package names when we decide this.
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: [DISCUSS] C++ SO versioning with 1.0.0" on Thu, 4 Jul 2019 13:55:03
+0200,
Krisztián Szűcs wrote:
> Created a PR with the versioning scheme described by @Kou.
> https:
Created a PR with the versioning scheme described by @Kou.
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4801
We can change later (but before the next release) to unblock
the failing CI builds.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 12:51 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 09:50:10 +0200
> Krisztián Szűcs w
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 09:50:10 +0200
Krisztián Szűcs wrote:
> Could We add a temporary solution and perhaps change the versioning schema
> later?
> I'm asking because all of our c++ based CI builds are failing now.
Wow, thanks for pointing out.
Indeed:
https://travis-ci.org/apache/arrow/builds/55411
gt;>
> >> There is the official Debian package for it:
> >>
> >> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=abi-compliance-checker
> >>
> >> In <20c3b917-6f80-ca14-669d-f89e7ec7f...@python.org>
> >> "Re: [DISCUSS] C++ SO ver
cial Debian package for it:
>>
>> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=abi-compliance-checker
>>
>> In <20c3b917-6f80-ca14-669d-f89e7ec7f...@python.org>
>> "Re: [DISCUSS] C++ SO versioning with 1.0.0" on Wed, 3 Jul 2019
>> 09:59:15 +020
s=abi-compliance-checker
>
> In <20c3b917-6f80-ca14-669d-f89e7ec7f...@python.org>
> "Re: [DISCUSS] C++ SO versioning with 1.0.0" on Wed, 3 Jul 2019
> 09:59:15 +0200,
> Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> >
> > Do we have any reliable tool to check for ABI
f80-ca14-669d-f89e7ec7f...@python.org>
"Re: [DISCUSS] C++ SO versioning with 1.0.0" on Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:59:15
+0200,
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Do we have any reliable tool to check for ABI breakage?
>
>
> Le 03/07/2019 à 02:57, Sutou Kouhei a écrit :
>>
Do we have any reliable tool to check for ABI breakage?
Le 03/07/2019 à 02:57, Sutou Kouhei a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We'll release 0.14.0 soon. Then we use "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT" at
> master. If we use "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT", C++ build is failed:
>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/CMakeLists.
Hi,
We'll release 0.14.0 soon. Then we use "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT" at
master. If we use "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT", C++ build is failed:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/CMakeLists.txt#L47
message(FATAL_ERROR "Need to implement SO version generation for Arrow 1.0+")
So we need to consider how t
10 matches
Mail list logo