Nice work!
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:43 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> Integration tests are passing:
>
> https://travis-ci.org/apache/arrow/jobs/584361357
>
> I'm merging the feature branch into master. Thanks all
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 6:15 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> >
> > Thanks all!
> >
> >
Integration tests are passing:
https://travis-ci.org/apache/arrow/jobs/584361357
I'm merging the feature branch into master. Thanks all
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 6:15 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> Thanks all!
>
> It looks like all the changes are in, so we need to see if the
> integration tests
hi there,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:45 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
> Thanks Bryan.
>
> I merged the Java patch with the EOS change and submitted a C++ patch
> which also updates the specification
>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5361
>
> Let me know when the JS or C# patches are ready to go
t; > the state, so if it reads the continuation token from the beginning,
> >> then
> >> > read all 8 bytes at the end.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Ji Liu
> >> > >
> >> > > [1] h
;> > > To:dev@arrow.apache.org ; Ji Liu <
>> > niki...@aliyun.com>
>> > > Cc:emkornfield ; Paul Taylor <
>> ptay...@apache.org>
>> > > Subject:RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Alter Arrow binary protocol to address
>> > 8-byte Flatbuffer alignmen
> > read all 8 bytes at the end.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ji Liu
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5229
> > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5229#discussion_r321715682
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------
> >
.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5280
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric Erhardt
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 10:12 AM
> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org; Ji Liu
> > Cc: emkornfield ; Paul Taylor
d Time:2019年9月5日(星期四) 07:16
> To:dev@arrow.apache.org ; Ji Liu
> Cc:emkornfield ; Paul Taylor
> Subject:RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Alter Arrow binary protocol to address 8-byte
> Flatbuffer alignment requirements (2nd vote)
>
> The C# PR is up.
>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pul
Message-
From: Wes McKinney
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 10:17 PM
To: Ji Liu
Cc: emkornfield ; dev ; Paul
Taylor
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Alter Arrow binary protocol to address 8-byte
Flatbuffer alignment requirements (2nd vote)
hi folks,
We now have patches up for Java, JS, and Go
: Wes McKinney
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 10:17 PM
To: Ji Liu
Cc: emkornfield ; dev ; Paul
Taylor
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Alter Arrow binary protocol to address 8-byte
Flatbuffer alignment requirements (2nd vote)
hi folks,
We now have patches up for Java, JS, and Go. How are we
, 2019 10:17 PM
To: Ji Liu
Cc: emkornfield ; dev ; Paul
Taylor
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Alter Arrow binary protocol to address 8-byte
Flatbuffer alignment requirements (2nd vote)
hi folks,
We now have patches up for Java, JS, and Go. How are we doing on the code
reviews for getting
---
> From:Ji Liu
> Send Time:2019年8月28日(星期三) 17:34
> To:emkornfield ; dev
> Cc:Paul Taylor
> Subject:Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Alter Arrow binary protocol to address 8-byte
> Flatbuffer alignment requirements (2nd vote)
>
> I could take the Java implementation and will ta
Kornfield
Send Time:2019年8月28日(星期三) 17:14
To:dev
Cc:Paul Taylor
Subject:Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Alter Arrow binary protocol to address 8-byte
Flatbuffer alignment requirements (2nd vote)
I should have integration tests with 0.14.1 generated binaries in the next
few days. I think the one remaining
Arrow binary protocol to address 8-byte
Flatbuffer alignment requirements (2nd vote)
I should have integration tests with 0.14.1 generated binaries in the next
few days. I think the one remaining unassigned piece of work in the Java
implementation, i can take that up next if no one else gets
I should have integration tests with 0.14.1 generated binaries in the next
few days. I think the one remaining unassigned piece of work in the Java
implementation, i can take that up next if no one else gets to it.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:19 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> Here's the C++ changes
>
Here's the C++ changes
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5211
I'm going to create a integration branch where we can merge each patch
before merging to master
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 9:03 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> It isn't implemented in C++ yet but I will try to get a patch up for
> that
It isn't implemented in C++ yet but I will try to get a patch up for
that soon (today maybe). I think we should create a branch where we
can stack the patches that implement this for each language.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 4:04 AM Paul Taylor wrote:
>
> I'll do the JS updates. Is it safe to
I'll do the JS updates. Is it safe to validate against the Arrow C++
integration tests?
On 8/22/19 7:28 PM, Micah Kornfield wrote:
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6313 as a tracking
issue with sub-issues on the development work. So far no-one has claimed
Java and
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6313 as a tracking
issue with sub-issues on the development work. So far no-one has claimed
Java and Javascript tasks.
Would it make sense to have a separate dev branch for this work?
Thanks,
Micah
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 3:24 PM Wes
The vote carries with 4 binding +1 votes and 1 non-binding +1
I'll merge the specification patch later today and we can begin
working on implementations so we can get this done for 0.15.0
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 12:30 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, 7:43 AM
20 matches
Mail list logo
