El mié, 17 ene 2024 a las 23:37, Matt Topol () escribió:
>
> Yea, I confirmed you're correct. I have a fix for this now and I've put up
> a PR[1] for it that Raul can cherry-pick into a new RC.
As the issue seems to have been around for 1.5 or 2 years I don't
think this issue requires a new RC.
Hi Sarah,
Thanks for pursuing this.
The ASF 3rd Party License Policy lists a number of standard,
off-the-shelf licenses that are compatible with Category B, but the
policy does not include any provision for custom-written licenses.
This appears to be a custom-written license. Is that correct?
Yes, that was roughly what I was requesting (I was suggesting a single PR
with many commits that would be merged with the history).
It's hard to provide a more concrete opinion on this without seeing the
quantity and complexity of the code. If it's 5,000 lines of code, it
probably doesn't matter.
Hi Ian,
Thank you for sharing your input on this.
> This appears to be a custom-written license. Is that correct?
Yes, that is correct. This is a custom written license.
> If not, can you provide some explanation of why this license should be
> considered to meet the criteria for Category B?
