The integration test failures, at least for the 1st part, are just
flakiness, and not related to the change. The merge conflict is also
not as it seems (or at least this is my conjecture). The 1st change
here advances the version, and the 2nd puts it to the next snapshot;
the second is based on
@Yingyi: As far as I know, Gift and Xikui are working on those features.
Best,
Taewoo
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Yingyi Bu wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback.
> It hasn't supported yet. But it should be easy to add.
>
> Is Java UDF support the only missing feature in
Thanks for the feedback.
It hasn't supported yet. But it should be easy to add.
Is Java UDF support the only missing feature in those two installation
options?
>> Unless they don't support it, it may be early to deprecate the managix?
It's deprecated for common use cases -- I'm not sure how
Sorry for the late response.
Do Ansible and AWS support "installing libraries" like the managix does?
Just checked the documentation. I'm talking about this:
https://ci.apache.org/projects/asterixdb/udf.html. Unless they don't
support it, it may be early to deprecate the managix?
Best,
Taewoo
Ian,
One of them fails integration tests, the other can't be merged and needs to be
rebased.
Cheers,
Abdullah.
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 11:16 AM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please verify and vote on the 2nd release of Apache AsterixDB
>
> The change that produced this
Hi everyone,
Please verify and vote on the 2nd release of Apache AsterixDB
The change that produced this release and the change to advance the version are
up for review here:
https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1660/
https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1661/
To check out the release,
Cancelling this to reroll RC1 with those two mentioned patches...
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Michael Blow wrote:
> [X] -1 do not release one or both packages because ...
>
> I found two issues discovered with the AsterixDB 0.9.1 RC0 source assembly:
> 1. Cannot build