Re: [APE] Unlimited Storage: Local disk caching in cloud deployment

+1, this will be a great addition. On Apr 3, 2024 at 09:44:01, Wail Alkowaileet wrote: > In the current cloud deployment, users are limited by the disk space of the > cluster's nodes. However, the blob storage services provided by cloud > providers (e.g., S3) can virtually store an "unlimited"

[ANNOUNCE] AsterixDB Weekly Community Meeting

Hi everyone, As some of you might know, there has been a longstanding weekly meeting for the AsterixDB community every Friday at 10AM Pacific time. It has always been open but not widely advertised. In the spirit of openness, it is time to change that. The meeting is nominally 1 hour long, but

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.3 (RC0)

K graph. > > > Successfully ran a query (after realizing that I hadn't properly set the > > namespace pulldowns right, my bad). > > > I didn't verify the same for Tableau however. (So I can't vouch for the > > taco file.) Did someone try that yet? > > > >

AsterixDB Development Meeting Summary: 03/29/24

Top level announcements/discussions: - Release(s) - Discussion r.e. keeping SQL++ docs in sync with grammar - Discussion r.e. requiring APEs/etc. Issue roundup: New: - 3368 (Closing S3 streams early still reads the whole file) - 3369 (Median) - 3370 (Accessed objects during compile) - 3371

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.3 (RC0)

r try. > > Cheers, > > Mike > > On 4/1/24 12:17 PM, Ian Maxon wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > Please verify and vote on the latest release of the AsterixDB JDBC > connector. > > > This release includes compatibility with the new Database keyword

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.3 (RC0)

ldefense.com/v3/__https://publicsuffix.org/list/__;!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!OA625G-YJtyCEHDQzGKWSLmbxorVdtbLKp-JReHjJEl3xAlHvdecwZ0ImZxmsT8U8T3YiWY6XDgXAbRAJFz3$ > . > > > // ===BEGIN ICANN DOMAINS=== > > ... > > > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:17 PM Ian Maxon wrote: > > Hi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.3 (RC0)

A slight amendment, as I forgot to edit the release reason. This release adds support for the new median() function in the tableau connector. On Apr 1, 2024 at 12:17:22, Ian Maxon wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please verify and vote on the latest release of the AsterixDB JDBC &g

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.3 (RC0)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of the AsterixDB JDBC connector. This release includes compatibility with the new Database keyword and level. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb-clients/+/18217 The

[DISCUSS] Programmatic Enforcement of APE/Documentation

Hi everyone, As brought up in some meetings some of you might have attended, there are some issues right now with the SQL++ grammar being out of sync with the documentation and railroad diagrams. A similar situation exists with undocumented features that don't have APEs, that were introduced after

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.8.2 and Apache Hyracks 0.9.8.2 (RC0)

erixdb.apache.org <mailto:dev@asterixdb.apache.org>> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.8.2 and Apache Hyracks > 0.9.8.2 (RC0) > > > +1 > > > > *Regards,* > > Wail Alkowaileet > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 13:50 Ian

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.9 and Apache Hyracks 0.3.9 (RC1)

The vote passes with 3 binding +1s and no 0's or -1's. Vote thread permalink: https://lists.apache.org/thread/gmcktgj51fly1ny2c4m5t41n6qfc6g8r On Mar 4, 2024 at 10:43:09, Michael Blow wrote: > > Please vote > > [ ] +1 release these packages as Apache AsterixDB 0.9.9 and Apache > > Hyracks

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.8.2 and Apache Hyracks 0.9.8.2 (RC0)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest stabilization release of Apache AsterixDB. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/18187 The release artifacts are as follows: AsterixDB Source

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.9 and Apache Hyracks 0.3.9 (RC1)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/18186 The release artifacts are as follows: AsterixDB Source

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.9 and Apache Hyracks 0.3.9 (RC0)

The RC is abandoned in favor of RC1 to include many important fixes. On Dec 12, 2023 at 08:36:15, Ian Maxon wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB. > > The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: >

AsterixDB Development Meeting Summary: 01/12/24

Issue roundup: New: - 3338 (Spurious hint warnings) Fixed: - 3336 (Improve CBO Trace logging - 3335 (CBO CH2 test bugs) - (Avoid warning when comparing missing fields in range filters) - 3329 (Consolidate SELECT operators in outer INLJ) - 3328 (Avoid removing X-products in external data) -

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.9 and Apache Hyracks 0.3.9 (RC0)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/18008 The release artifacts are as follows: AsterixDB Source

Re: [VOTE][APE] Query Plan Cache

+1. This has been a long awaited feature. On Dec 7, 2023 at 14:21:31, Glenn Justo Galvizo wrote: > Every time a query is issued to AsterixDB, the query must undergo > compilation. If the same query is run repeatedly, this query must be > recompiled each and every time. A query plan cache can

Re: [VOTE][APE] Compute-Storage Separation (Cloud Mode Deployment)

+1 On Dec 1, 2023 at 12:28:23, Murtadha Al-Hubail wrote: > Each AsterixDB cluster today consists of one or more Node Controllers (NC) > where the data is stored and processed. Each NC has a predefined set of > storage partitions (iodevices). When data is ingested into the system, the > data is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.2 (RC0)

rote: > > +1 > > > > From: Peeyush Gupta > > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 7:50:18 PM > > To: dev@asterixdb.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.2 (RC0) > > > +1 > > > On 2023/11/20 23:3

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.2 (RC0)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of the AsterixDB JDBC connector. This release includes compatibility with the new Database keyword and level. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb-clients/+/17973 The

AsterixDB Development Meeting Summary: 11/17/23

Issue roundup: New: - 3300: Columnar filter bug w/ booleans - 3301: NPE w/ subquery with only SELECT ELEMENT - 3302: Compilation error for index creation - 3303: Projection sizes - 3304: Column projection pushdown missing fields - 3305: Cast exception for columnar w/ LEFT OUTER - 3306: Ensure no

AsterixDB Development Meeting Summary: 11/03/23

Issue roundup: New: - 3292: Don't allow dupe fields in dynamic prefix collections - 3293: Metadata query min budget is too high - 3294: Type inference based on field access for dynamic prefixes - 3295: Allow writing to empty S3 dir - 3296: Use default database/verse with COPY TO - 3297: Properly

Re: [APE] Support COPY TO

+1, this will be great. Long ago we had WRITE TO but it was very limited and troublesome. This is a great improvement over that older facility. On Oct 24, 2023 at 09:53:40, Wail Alkowaileet wrote: > Currently, AsterixDB does not have a clean way to extract query results or > dump a dataset to

Re: [VOTE] Changing COPY FROM syntax

+1, looks more consistent with other statements to me. On Oct 24, 2023 at 10:16:48, Wail Alkowaileet wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm proposing to change the current syntax for COPY FROM. The current > syntax looks as follows: > > COPY Customers > > USING localfs ( > >

Re: Personal Feedback to your last board report

The vote was closed with the result, but sorry about not using the typical flags. There was also a +1 that wasn't counted that came after I closed the vote since it passed. The thread is here: https://lists.apache.org/thread/zkxdsg7hl9m0h6xtxckk6lk532vltwlh . I also added this release to the

Re: [VOTE] Message frame support APE

+1, this will be great to have and fix a longstanding issue in Hyracks. On Sep 30, 2023 at 13:17:06, Glenn Justo Galvizo wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We are proposing a new feature for Hyracks users to communicate using > "message frames" to communicate state to downstream operators. This is >

Re: Update of minimum Java version to 17

+1, there is a lot of good stuff in 17 and we have been running many things with it. Being able to use all the language features like records will be great. On Oct 3, 2023 at 11:01:14, Mike Carey wrote: > Sounds like a good plan! > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 9:33 AM Michael Blow > wrote: > >

Re: Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.1

gt; > To: dev@asterixdb.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.1 > > > +1 > > > - Checked hashes > > - Compiled from source code > > > Thanks, > > Peeyush > > > On 2023/09/08 21:41:08 Ian Maxon wro

Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8.1

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of the AsterixDB JDBC connector. This release includes a commit unintentionally missing from release 0.9.8 The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb-clients/+/17768 The

AsterixDB Weekly Dev Summary (Jul 10-14)

Newly Filed Issues: ASTERIXDB-3218 (Reduce S3 calls) ASTERIXDB-3219 (Make log replication have a timeout) ASTERIXDB-3220 (Make

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.8.1 and Hyracks 0.3.8.1

> - Source files have Apache header > > - No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files) > > - Can compile from source > > > Checked the AsterixDB Server binary artifact: > > - Signatures and hashes correct > > — LICENSE and NOTICE look ok > >

[DISCUSS] Altering storage write rate limiting, and adding read rate limiting

Hi everyone, I've been working on a patch that adds read rate limiting to AsterixDB so that multiple NCs can share the same disk in a more cooperative fashion. Clearly since we already have write rate limiting, I looked at how that is done as a first step. It seemed easy enough to perform the read

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.8.1 and Hyracks 0.3.8.1

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/17502 The release artifacts are as follows: AsterixDB Source

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Iceberg support APE

The vote passes with 3 binding +1's. On Apr 12, 2023 at 22:01:21, Mike Carey wrote: > +1 for APE1 (!) > > On 4/12/23 2:17 PM, Ian Maxon wrote: > > Based on the discussion in > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3o0xrth73

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Iceberg support APE

And here is my +1 as well. On Apr 12, 2023 at 15:15:19, Taewoo Kim wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:17 PM Ian Maxon wrote: > > Based on the discussion in > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3o0xrth73ml7rxq71c7nytgmt8m2f4y__;!!Cz

[VOTE] Accept Apache Iceberg support APE

Based on the discussion in https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3o0xrth73ml7rxq71c7nytgmt8m2f4y, it seems like there is a positive sentiment towards our first APE proposal. Therefore I think it is time to vote. The vote is the usual procedure, open for 72 hours and passes with either 3 votes or the

Re: [DISCUSS] Read support for Apache Iceberg tables

This will be great to support and the changes required are not invasive or radical in any way, so it's a win on both fronts. Really looking forward to this being accepted and merged in. On Mar 30, 2023 at 03:53:15, Hari Kishore Chaparala wrote: > Initiating the discussion thread proposing a

Re: Broken link in the documentation for spatial join

There's something messed up with how the docs are generated. I will have to figure that out first. The way I do it is normally to just run the profile which makes the railroad diagrams, then 'mvn site' . Somehow the spatial join docs are not getting included that way. On Mar 17, 2023 at 09:32:52,

Re: [VOTE] AsterixDB Proposed Enhancements (APEs)

+1 On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:01 AM Taewoo Kim wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:58 AM Till Westmann wrote: > > > And here is my +1. > > > > On 10 Mar 2023, at 10:54, Till Westmann wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > There seems to be a positive sentiment towards the APE proposal

Re: [DISCUSS] AsterixDB Proposed Enhancements (APEs)

gt; > > c) it needs some improvement or > > > d) it just adds overhead or > > > e) ... > > > > > > Please let us know what you think about the proposal. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Till > > > > > > On 21 Feb 2023,

[DISCUSS] AsterixDB Proposed Enhancements (APEs)

Hi everyone. On one of our quarterly reports to the ASF board we got some comments about how dev@ is a ghost town. It would be very hard to discern the direction of the project from it at this point. So, Mike, Till and I discussed and came up with something that hopefully should remedy that and

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.8 (RC0)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the second release of the AsterixDB JDBC connector. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb-clients/+/16383 The release artifacts are as follows: JDBC Driver Source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.8 and Apache Hyracks 0.3.8 (RC1)

- No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files) > - Can compile from source > > Checked the AsterixDB Installer binary artifact: > - Signatures and hashes correct > — LICENSE and NOTICE look ok > > Till > > On 3 May 2022, at 0:36, Ian Maxon wrote: > >

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.8 and Apache Hyracks 0.3.8 (RC1)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/16244 The release artifacts are as follows: AsterixDB Source

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.8 and Apache Hyracks 0.3.8 (RC0)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/16183 The release artifacts are as follows: AsterixDB Source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.7.1 (RC1)

onCData-based views. > > On 2/25/22 2:52 AM, Ian Maxon wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Please verify and vote on the first release of the AsterixDB JDBC connector. > > > > This release candidate fixes some issues with license files that were > > pr

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.7.1 (RC1)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the first release of the AsterixDB JDBC connector. This release candidate fixes some issues with license files that were present in RC0 as well as simplifying the list of artifacts. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.7.1 (RC0)

/asterixdb/asterix-jdbc-driver-0.9.7.1-dist.jar.sha512 SHA512: cf20d630dc09665a2d2902821f844228c53e869632f49b356741adca47f98b639c29d4a9fef265272ba2fce670c428f63ab64b3692efc3b502ce89286763c097 On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:21 AM Ian Maxon wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Please verify and vote

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB JDBC Connector 0.9.7.1 (RC0)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the first release of the AsterixDB JDBC connector. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb-clients/+/15224 The release artifacts are as follows: JDBC Driver Source

Re: ci.apache.org deprecation. Move asterixdb job

Sorry for the lag, I filed it as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22739 On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 1:37 AM Gavin McDonald wrote: > > > > On 2022/01/01 00:04:43 Ian Maxon wrote: > > Yes, we use it to build the latest documentation from source for the > > websi

Re: ci.apache.org deprecation. Move asterixdb job

Yes, we use it to build the latest documentation from source for the website. I will file a ticket. On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 03:05 Gavin McDonald wrote: > Hi All, > > You have a CI job currently running at > https://ci.apache.org/builders/asterixdb-master-docs which builds docs > and publishes

Regarding CVE-2021-44228, aka log4shell

Hi everyone, Given that AsterixDB extensively uses log4j2 we are consequently affected by the extremely severe RCE 0day vulnerability that has come to light as of late. Release 0.9.7.1 contains basically only an update to log4j 2.15 to mitigate this issue; otherwise it is identical to 0.9.7. If

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.7.1 and Hyracks 0.9.7.1 (RC0)

> > want to > > > > consider advancing log4j-1.2-api to 2.15.0. > > > > > > > > Verified: > > > > > > > >- source builds > > > >- signatures > > > >- checksums > > > > > > >

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.7.1 and Hyracks 0.9.7.1 (RC0)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB. This release is purely a maintenance release to 0.9.7 and contains minimal changes. The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/14504 The release artifacts

Re: [VOTE] Accept donation of AsterixDB JDBC Driver

+1 On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 8:37 AM Heri Ramampiaro wrote: > > +1! > -heri > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 23, 2021, at 16:48, Mike Carey wrote: > > > > +1 (!!) > > > >> On 8/22/21 11:51 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Couchbase would like to donate a JDBC driver for AsterixDB

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.7 and Hyracks 0.3.7 (RC1)

& Committers (binding): +1 [4] 0 [0] -1 [0] Voting Record: Wail Alkowaileet+1 Mike Carey: +1 Till Westmann: +1 Ian Maxon:+1 Thanks for voting and reviewing the release, everyone. On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 6:21 PM Ian Maxon wrote: > > +1 > Starts fine, I check

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.7 and Hyracks 0.3.7 (RC1)

t;> +1 > >> > >> - Signatures and hashes ok (verified with Ian as the older KEYS were > >> *expired*) > >> - Source compilation works. > >> - Deployed cluster using Ansible and executed a few queries against > >> Parquet > >> files. > >&g

Re: Error when compile the latest code on the master branch

erial/select : es2015 as esm2015 > [ERROR] Compiling @angular/material/tooltip : es2015 as esm2015 > [ERROR] Compiling @angular/common/http : es2015 as esm2015 > [ERROR] Compiling @angular/cdk/tree : es2015 as esm2015 > ``` > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 1:58 PM Ian Maxon wro

Re: Error when compile the latest code on the master branch

You need to upgrade to Java 11. Maven enforcer is restricting it to be 11 or newer recently. > On Jun 12, 2021, at 09:01, Tin Vu wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just cloned the latest version of AsterixDB - master branch > (0.9.7). When I build the code using >

Asterix Meeting Minutes: 06/11/21

Announcements: - End of quarter - Shiva's Topic Exam Success Customers: -n/a Apache: - 0.9.7 RCs Papers: 1. Replication People: Chen Status: Awaiting submit 2. Dynamic query opt Christina Submitted 3. Polyframe Gift Submitted (Jul 15) 4. BAD Journal Xikui Wait

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.7 and Hyracks 0.3.7 (RC1)

A small correction, the change is actually at: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/11903 On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 3:48 PM Ian Maxon wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB > > The change that produced this releas

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.7 and Hyracks 0.3.7 (RC1)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB The change that produced this release is up for review on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/11824 The release artifacts are as follows: AsterixDB Source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.7 and Hyracks 0.3.7 (RC0)

; Hyracks 0.3.7 > > I downloaded the Installer and test-drove it. I ran all the SQL++ > Primer statements against it using the new (19006) console. In the > process I also tried different result display formats and tried the > query plan viewer on all of the statements. > > On 6

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.7 and Hyracks 0.3.7 (RC0)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB The change that produced this release is up for review on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/11824 The release artifacts are as follows: AsterixDB Source

Re: Fail to start AsterixDB cluster

Service. But it would be still great to figure out what happened > with NCService option. > > Thanks, > > Tin > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 1:36 AM Ian Maxon wrote: >> >> Can you post the NC log? That should show why it failed to start. >> >> On Sat, Feb

Re: Fail to start AsterixDB cluster

Can you post the NC log? That should show why it failed to start. On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 5:04 PM Tin Vu wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to install AsterixDB 0.9.6 on my cluster. I'm following the > tutorial at: > https://ci.apache.org/projects/asterixdb/ncservice.html#Multi_machine > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.6 and Hyracks 0.3.6 (RC0)

ng binary > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 4:26 PM Mike Carey wrote: > >> > >>> REMINDER: Folks should please verify and vote! (That way our > >>> Fearless > >>> Leader can perhaps include the outcome in the report that's due in 2 > &

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.6 and Hyracks 0.3.6 (RC0)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB The change that produced this release is up for review on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/8225 The release artifacts are as follows: AsterixDB Source

Re: [EXT] Re: CVE Publication Service Request 941606

tml > > Please advise? > > Kelly Todd > Senior Cybersecurity Engineer > CVE Content Team > kt...@mitre.org > > -Original Message- > From: Ian Maxon > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 11:32 AM > To: Kelly Todd > Cc: Apache Security Team ; priv...@asterixdb.

Re: Parquet binary files in the code-base

I think generally we try to avoid it where possible but it's hard to sometimes. IMO, as long as the file is small and changes very rarely, it's fine. If it's not maybe there's some way to generate it on the fly from a textual representation? On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 2:35 PM Wail Alkowaileet

[CVE-2020-9479] Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache AsterixDB

CVE-2020-9479: AsterixDB directory traversal Severity: Important Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: None released, git commits 580b81aa5eb8e1b0620521a1c9680e54df73 to 28c0ee84f1387ab5d0659e9e822f4e3923ddc22d , fixed in 28c0ee84f1387ab5d0659e9e822f4e3923ddc22d and

[ANNOUNCE] Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5

The Apache AsterixDB Team is happy to announce the latest release of Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and its associated Hyracks release. Apache AsterixDB is a Big Data Management System (BDMS) that can store, index, manage, and query semi-structured data at scale on a cluster. (Hyracks is its underlying

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Hyracks 0.3.5 (RC4)

gt; >>> Taewoo > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:04 AM Michael Blow > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> [ X ] +1 release these packages as Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and > >>>> Apache Hyracks 0.3.5

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Hyracks 0.3.5 (RC4)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB The change that produced this release is up for review on Gerrit: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/7124 The release artifacts are as follows: AsterixDB Source

Re: Micro-batch semantics for UDFs

I would say in addendum to what Dmitry is asking, try debugging like this: Add your function to asterix-external-data, where all the examples are. Then you can easily upload it and debug the function in AsterixHyracksIntegrationUtil, just by setting a breakpoint in IntelliJ or whatever you'd like

Re: Access OpenCL-installation from inside AsterixDB-instance

is in your PATH (windows) or in LD_LIBRARY_PATH (linux). > > Could it be that something has to be done with regards to the > PATH-configuration for Asterix? > > Best wishes, > Torsten > > ________ > From: Ian Maxon > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 201

Re: UDF Lifecycle

Yeah, I think maybe a global init is not really appropriate for this case though- we don't want UDFs taking memory outside of jobs (i think?). initialize() in the current API sounds appropriate for the problem described if I understand it right, I think. Gift's Stanford NLP demo has a similar

Re: Large UDFs

Sounds like a bug, can you share the UDF in question so I can debug it? > On Nov 16, 2019, at 05:17, Torsten Bergh Moss > wrote: > > Greetings devs, > > > Hope you are all enjoying your weekends. > > > I am trying to build a GPU-based UDF, and this UDF relies on a bunch of > dependencies

Revocation of Release key

Hey everyone, Since the old GPG key (A98FEA87A56EA980) we used to sign the releases could have been compromised, I went ahead and revoked it. The revocation certificate is in KEYS, and is as follows: -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Comment: This is a revocation certificate

Asterix Meeting Minutes: 09/06/19

Announcements: - NSF grant started - Preston defended thesis - INSPIRE ending Customers: - new local user - Personicle - Cloudberry Apache: - RC3 out for vote Papers: 1. Similarity search Person(s): Taewoo Status: Preparing expts 2. Living within a budget Person(s): Taewoo

Re: Develop UDF for AsterixDB 0.9.5

Hey Torsten, There actually is a new way, it's not documented yet because it's still a work in progress. However, the part of it you might be most interested in is merged. If you're on latest master, you can send a UDF via HTTP POST with cURL to

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Hyracks 0.3.5 (RC3)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB. This candidate fixes the binary name and missing Netty notice from RC2. The change that produced this release and the change to advance the version are up for review on Gerrit:

Re: asterix-docker | not able to generate image

This package is excluded from the normal build as it only runs on linux, and we haven't started doing docker packaging for releases yet, so it is basically a stub at this point. However I went ahead and updated it so it should work, the configuration has changed a lot since that module got added.

Re: Rest API : Named and Position based parameters are working

Hey Bhukailas, I am not sure how you are formatting your request exactly, it isn't clear to me from the example. It needs to be either a JSON object or a list of comma delimited arguments like "statement=foo,..." However, here's an example of the request format in JSON using curl to send it: 1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Hyracks 0.3.5 (RC2)

; > - Builds were successful without any error. > > - Smoke test using the binary was successful. > > Best, > Taewoo > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 12:49 AM Ian Maxon wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Please verify and vote on the latest rel

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Hyracks 0.3.5 (RC2)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB The change that produced this release and the change to advance the version are up for review on Gerrit:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Hyracks 0.3.5 (RC1)

; > [V] +1 release these packages as Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Apache > > Hyracks > > > 0.3.5 > > > > > > - Checked the SHA256 of the zip files. > > > - Builds were successful without any error. > > > - Smoke test using the binary was successful. &g

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Hyracks 0.3.5 (RC1)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB The change that produced this release and the change to advance the version are up for review on Gerrit:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Hyracks 0.3.5 (RC0)

L++ tutorial paces: > > > > +1 release these packages as Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and Apache Hyracks > > 0.3.5 > > > > On 6/25/19 6:19 PM, Ian Maxon wrote: > > > [ ] +1 release these packages as Apache AsterixDB 0.9.5 and > > > Apache Hyracks 0.3.5 > >

Re: Mailing list is down for UCI?

Yeah I observed this too. Messages reach the list from UCI addresses but messages from the list won’t reach them. I guess we need to talk to OIT to see what is going on, I thought it was only me. On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 18:18 Till Westmann wrote: > Hi Xikui, > > Your message reached the list. >

Re: Hyracks WordCount Example

Hey Igor, Unfortunately those docs are a bit outdated. You need a config in most cases. We test it like this but the docs and packaging never caught up after we fixed our config story a bit. I have a patch up to refresh things a bit but what you have in the source as is will work. For example, if

Re: Hyracks Jobs - Missing CLI

Hi Ígor, You might want to take a look at this patch: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/3356/ It adds some brief documentation about how to run the wordcount example program with Hyracks. That's probably about as close as we have to existing API documentation/examples for the Hyracks side of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.4.1 and Hyracks 0.3.4.1 (RC2)

1 and Apache > > > Hyracks 0.3.4.1 > > > > > > (I downloaded and verified the NCService puzzle piece and it worked > like > > a > > > charm.) > > > > > > On 2/15/19 12:03 PM, Ian Maxon wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, >

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.4.1 and Hyracks 0.3.4.1 (RC2)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB The change that produced this release and the change to advance the version are up for review on Gerrit:

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.4.1 and Hyracks 0.3.4.1 (RC1)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB The change that produced this release and the change to advance the version are up for review on Gerrit:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.4.1 and Hyracks 0.3.4.1 (RC0)

of > hyracks/algebricks (should be 0.3.4.1) > 3. The asterix-docker pom lists its version as 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT (should be > 0.9.4.1) > 4. The NOTICE files in all packages should be updated to *-2019 (currently > *-2018) > > Thanks, > > -MDB > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 a

[VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB 0.9.4.1 and Hyracks 0.3.4.1 (RC0)

Hi everyone, Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB The change that produced this release and the change to advance the version are up for review on Gerrit:

Re: [DISCUSS] ASF git migration

Whoops, nevermind, this thread is a dupe... On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:39 AM Ian Maxon wrote: > > Hey everyone, > ASF is making all projects switch from the current git url to a > different one by Feb 7th. I've been looking into this and it should > probably be at most an up

Re: [DISCUSS] Migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

+1, this should be easy. We just need to modify the git-asf script. On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 9:37 PM Murtadha Hubail wrote: > > +1 to the migration plan and the removal of incubator-asterixdb-hyracks.git. > > Cheers, > Murtadha > > On 01/05/2019, 12:02 AM, "Mike Carey" wrote: > > Agreement!

[DISCUSS] ASF git migration

Hey everyone, ASF is making all projects switch from the current git url to a different one by Feb 7th. I've been looking into this and it should probably be at most an update to git-asf and some people's git remote references. It will be nice because now we should be able to accept github PRs

  1   2   >