Re: [VOTE] Move Aurora to Apache Attic

With a heavy heart: +1 (binding) On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 08:15 +0900, thinker0 wrote: > +2 > 2020년 2월 5일 (수) 오전 2:22, Mauricio Garavaglia > 님이작성: > > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:27 PM Dave Lester wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > On 2020/02/03 22:59:56, Rick Mangi wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.22.0 RC1

+1 Thanks for driving this! On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 19:45 -0300, Mauricio Garavaglia wrote: > +1 All tests passed > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:37 PM Renan DelValle wrote: > > Kicking the voting off with a +1 from me. > > Ran the end to end tests successfully. > > On Tue, 03 Dec 2019 13:36:31 -0800

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.22.0 RC0

Thanks! On 04.11.19, 21:14, "Renan DelValle" wrote: Voting -1, marking this release as failed, and closing the vote on this release candidate. As Stephan Erb pointed out, we are currently failing our end to end tests. Will investigate a solution and call

Re: Re: Planning for 0.22.0 release

Sounds good from my side as well. +1 On 15.10.19, 19:20, "Mauricio Garavaglia" wrote: +1 On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 7:03 PM Renan DelValle wrote: > Folks, > > We've accumulated enough changes where I feel comfortable beginning the > voting process for a release

Re: Python 2 is being sunset on January, 2020

Supporting both versions temporarily for one release might be helpful for a seamless upgrade path.However, of that is too much effort going directly to Python 3 sounds okay to me as well. There are a few complications with Thrift though. I have left some details on the github issue. Thanks for

Re: Moving website from svnpubsub to gitpubsub

Sounds good to me. Thanks for driving this! Updating the documentation is a bit painful though. We would need to invest into the tooling to get that fully automated. Best regards, Stephan On 28.08.19, 19:51, "Renan DelValle" wrote: CAUTION: External email. Please validate the sender

Re: Moving website from svnpubsub to gitpubsub

Sounds good to me. I have no objections moving to git. Updating the documentation is a bit painful though. We would need to invest into the tooling before we get that fully automated, even once we are on git. On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 10:50 -0700, Renan DelValle wrote: > All, > I plan on filing a

Re: Merging Batch Aware Auto Pause and preparing 0.22.0 for release

Sounds good to me. Thanks for driving this! I have another small patch lying around that I would like to get upstreamed. I hope to have it ready for review in a few days. Best regards,Stephan On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 15:07 -0700, Renan DelValle wrote: > Folks, > Pending a sanity check from

Re: New PMC member: Mauricio Garavaglia

Welcome :) We are glad to have you on board! On 24.07.19, 21:17, "Renan DelValle" wrote: All, It is my pleasure to announce that Mauricio Garavaglia has agreed to join the Aurora PMC. His membership acceptance comes at a crucial time for the project to continue to exist as

Status and Health of the Aurora Project

Dear Aurora community, the Apache Aurora project has seen a significant slowdown of user and contributor activity over the most recent months. This can partially be attributed to the overall stability and maturity of the project, but more importantly this is due to other external projects that

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repos to gitbox.apache.org - one week left!

I finally managed to take a look. Turns out that the `aurora-website.git`is unused. Apparently it was created but never adopted. Our site is still powered by https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aurora/site. I have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17797 to get it removed. Best

Re: nudge on report

Hi Ted, I will get back to you within the next 48 hours, so that we can get this resolved. Best regards, Stephan On 16.01.19, 20:19, "Ted Dunning" wrote: Aurora didn't file a board report this month. Is there somebody who can commit to corralling a report for next month in

Re: [DISCUSSION] Potential braking change in Mesos 1.6 upgrade - docker thermos based tasks and aurora task ssh

he sandbox from 755 (-rwxr-xr-x) to 750 (-rwxr-x---) ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8332). Stephan Erb fixed most of the breakage caused by this change with his recent patch https://github.com/apache/aurora/commit/32776792d273b36afbf4a1bab69a66

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: AuroraBot #159733

I have disabled the build https://builds.apache.org/job/AuroraBot/ for now in order to stop this madness. It looks like as if there is a general issue with the Apache build infrastructure. On 28.09.18, 14:34, "Apache Jenkins Server" wrote: See

Re: Unofficial Binaries for Aurora 0.21.0

Thanks a lot for providing those! On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 13:08 -0700, Renan DelValle wrote: > All, > > Since we voted to eliminate official binary packages with our last official > binary release being 0.20.0, I'm providing UNOFFICIAL binary packages for > the community via my own personal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.21.0 RC1

+1 (binding). Release verification has passed for me as well. On 06.09.18, 23:01, "Renan DelValle" wrote: Ran the verify release script, +1 (binding) from me. On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 2:00 PM Renan DelValle wrote: > All, > > I propose that we accept the

Re: svn commit: r1833461 - in /aurora/3rdparty/ubuntu/xenial64/python: mesos.executor-1.5.0-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg mesos.executor-1.5.1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg

I have uploaded the Mesos 1.5 eggs for Centos 7, Trusty, and Jessie now. Centos 6 failed to compile with a segmentation fault in GCC. Please note though that we have discontinued official Aurora binary packages. We therefore might also cut back on these egg builds in the future. If needed you

Re: Massive instance rescheduling outage upon traffic spike

Hey Tengfei, the Aurora health checks cannot differentiate a service instance which has deadlocked from one which is extremely slow. The decision to restart is then performed by the executor without central coordination by the scheduler. Your best course of action will therefore be to prevent

Re: [NOTICE] Aurora is moving to Apache GitBox

Thanks for driving this effort! I am looking forward to the change, as it hopefully makes it easier for new contributors. On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 13:21 -0700, Renan DelValle wrote: > All, > > The vote to move from the legacy ASF git hosting to the GitBox service has > passed. When we finish our

Re: Recovery instructions updates

That sounds indeed concerning. Would be great if you could file an issue and attach the related log files and tracebacks. Bill recently added a potential replacement for the existing restore mechanism: https://github.com/apache/aurora/commit/2e1ca42887bc8ea1e8c6cddebe9d1cf29268c714. Given the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.20.x packages

+1 for the release as is Am 3. Mai 2018 21:05:32 MESZ schrieb Renan DelValle : >All, > >Do we want to keep the vote open or should I close it as failed? It's >been >nearly a month since I called it. > >I am +1 for making these the official packages as I haven't encountered >any

Docker Improvements

Hi everyone, there are two interesting patches up for review that improve the docker functionality in Aurora. If anyone is invested into Docker, please have a look! Adding enhancements to Docker functionality and client support for FetcherURIs https://reviews.apache.org/r/66537 Implement

Re: I need help with Homebrew.

Hey :) certain Python + SSL variants on MacOS can have difficulties connection to the Python package index. Please try to patch https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/pants# L35 to use virtualenv==15.2.0. You can leave the pants version at 1.4.0.dev23, which is the one we have been using

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.20.0 RC1

Collector::test_mesos_disk_collector_bad_api_path > > Can anyone else confirm if this happens to them as well? > > -Renan > > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 1:43 AM, Stephan Erb <stephan@blue-yonder.com> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Verification script has

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.20.0 RC1

+1 Verification script has passed for me now. On 28.03.18, 21:30, "Renan DelValle" wrote: All, I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official Apache Aurora 0.20.0 release. Aurora 0.20.0-rc1 includes the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.20.0 RC0

Unfortunately, I am unable to get the end-to-end tests to pass, even after a full `vagrant destroy && git clean -xfd`. Things I have seen fail: • Failures of the curl disabling Mesos maintenance schedules • Can't check signature: public key not found I have tested on two different computers

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

+1 On 21.02.18, 20:01, "David McLaughlin" wrote: +1 from me. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Renan DelValle wrote: > Another friendly reminder that we can't release the binary packages for > 0.19.x without at least three +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.1 RC0

+1 (binding) On 09.02.18, 02:02, "Bill Farner" wrote: +1, binding I did encounter a unit test failure, but maintain my +1 as this test case has been notorious flaky on macOS 10.13.3 (especially for me, apparently). All other checks in the verification

Re: Aurora 0.20.0 Release Date

I think this is a good idea. Development has slowed down enough that it should not be difficult to cut a release. On 09.02.18, 02:49, "Renan DelValle" wrote: All, Since Mesos has shipped version 1.5.0 today, should we consider releasing 0.20.0 (which supports

Re: Welcome new committers and PMC member!

Congratulations and welcome! On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 12:11 -0800, Manivannan wrote: > Welcome Renan and Jordan! > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Bill Farner wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > I'm happy to announce that we have two new developers on the project! > > > > Renan

Re: [REPORT] Apache Aurora - December 2017

Thanks! On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 09:34 -0500, Jake Farrell wrote: > Please find below the draft report for December, if anyone has any > modifications or additions please let me know > > -Jake > > > > Apache Aurora is a stateless and fault tolerant service scheduler > used to > schedule jobs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

I was just trying to run the validation scripts for Debian Jessie and those are failing with the error: I1210 20:48:36.172399 7371 fetcher.cpp:283] Fetching directly into the sandbox directory I1210 20:48:36.172417 7371 fetcher.cpp:220] Fetching URI '' Failed to fetch '': A relative path was

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Aurora #1858

Actually there was never a discussion. I just enabled it as a test and then totally forgot about it because it worked surprisingly well. I believe we won't use more than 1-2 GB. I simply added the remaining 2 as an additional safeguard when something else is launched on the Jenkins node shortly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.18.1 RC1

+1 Thanks for handling this, Bill. On Mon, 2017-10-30 at 10:05 -0500, Joshua Cohen wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Bill Farner > wrote: > > > > > > > sha512 signature > > > > > > Thanks, this is now fixed. The release script runs from the > > released

Re: Redesign of the Aurora UI

+1 for switching to react. I believe this will reduce maintenance effort for us in the long term. On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 15:19 -0700, David McLaughlin wrote: > Just a heads up: Facebook have decided to relicense React and Jest as > MIT: > > https://code.facebook.com/posts/300798627056246 > > So

Re: [REPORT] Apache Aurora - Sept 2017

Thank you, Jake! On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 11:31 -0400, Jake Farrell wrote: > Apache Aurora is a stateless and fault tolerant service scheduler > used to > schedule jobs onto Apache Mesos such as long-running services, cron > jobs, > and one off tasks. > > Project Status > - > The Apache

Re: Aurora reconciliation and Master fail over

Reconciliation in Aurora is not a specific mode. It just runs concurrently to other background work such as snapshots or backups [1]. Just be aware that we don't have metrics to track the runtime of explicit and implicit reconciliations. If you use settings that are overly aggressive, you might

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.17.x packages

This vote has passed.  Vote summary: +1 votes: 3 binding +0 votes: 0 -1 votes: 0 Artifacts are now available in the official Apache Aurora bintray repos: https://bintray.com/apache/aurora/  On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 17:53 +0100, Stephan Erb wrote: > All, > > I propose that we accept the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.17.x packages

We are still one binding vote short for a release. Would be great if at least of one additional PMC could take a look this week. On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 17:53 +0100, Stephan Erb wrote: > All, > > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb > and rpm packaging

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.17.0 RC0

+1 Verified via release candidate script and deployment to a test cluster. On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 11:22 +0100, Stephan Erb wrote: > All, > > I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the > official > Apache Aurora 0.17.0 release. > > Aurora 0.17.0-rc0 i

[VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.17.0 RC0

All, I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official Apache Aurora 0.17.0 release. Aurora 0.17.0-rc0 includes the following: --- The RELEASE NOTES for the release are available at: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git=RELEASE-NOTES.md =rel/0.17.0-rc0 The

Re: Preparations for 0.17.0

Hi everyone, I plan to cut 0.17.0rc this week. Please have a look at the open reviews so that we can wrap this up. https://reviews.apache.org/groups/aurora/ Best Regards, Stephan On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 00:10 +0100, Stephan Erb wrote: > We are closing in on the number of open issues. ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.16.0 RC2

+1 (binding) Verified via ./build-support/release/verify-release-candidate 0.16.0-rc2 On Do, 2016-09-22 at 15:36 -0500, Joshua Cohen wrote: > +0 Missing AURORA-1779 in CHANGELOG > +1 Everything checks out via verify-release-candidate > > Overall +1 (binding). > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:18

[VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.14.0 packages

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.13.0 packages

Unfortunately, I managed to break the links using newlines. Please be mindful when trying to follow them. On Di, 2016-06-21 at 00:53 +0200, Stephan Erb wrote: > All, > > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb > and rpm packaging for Apache Aurora 0.13.0

[VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.13.0 packages

All, I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb and rpm packaging for Apache Aurora 0.13.0. https://dl.bintray.com/stephanerb/aurora/ The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following: --- The CHANGELOGs are available at:

Re: [FEEDBACK] Transitioning Aurora leader election to Apache Curator (`-zk_use_curator`)

Thanks for doing the follow-up! I'll gradually enable the option on our clusters sometime next week and let you know if we hit any issues. Assuming we don't run into any roadblocks: How about changing the default of `-zk_use_curator` from False to True for the next release? Then we cane make

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.14.0 RC0

All, The vote to accept Apache Aurora 0.14.0 RC0 as the official Apache Aurora 0.14.0 release has passed. +1 (Binding) -- Jake Farrell Maxim Khutornenko Stephan Erb +1 (Non-binding) -- Martin Hrabovčin There were no 0 or -1 votes. Thank you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.14.0 RC0

+1 from me, for completeness. Verified via: ./build-support/release/verify-release-candidate 0.14.0-rc0  On Fr, 2016-06-10 at 16:28 +0200, Stephan Erb wrote: > Re-post without line breaks in links: > I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the > official > A

From Aurora 0.14 to 0.15

Hi everyone, even though we are still in the process of getting 0.14 out of the door, I'd like to propose that we aim for a short release cycle for 0.15. This would entail: * the update to Mesos 0.28.x * no deprecation removals, so that it's easy to update from 0.14 to 0.15.  Any objections? 

Re: [DRAFT][REPORT]: Apache Aurora

using filesystem image with the new > Apache > Mesos unified containerizer. > > Community > --- > Latest Additions: > > * PMC addition: Stephan Erb, 2.3.2016 > > Issue backlog status since last report: > > * Created:   62 > * Resolved:  80 > > Mailing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.14.0 RC0

16:00:00 CEST 2016 [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Aurora 0.14.0 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Aurora 0.14.0 because... On Fr, 2016-06-10 at 16:23 +0200, Stephan Erb wrote: > All, > > I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the > official > Apach

[VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.14.0 RC0

All, I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official Apache Aurora 0.14.0 release. Aurora 0.14.0-rc0 includes the following: --- The RELEASE NOTES for the release are available at: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git=RELEASE-NOTES.md =rel/0.14.0-rc0 The