[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

2018-02-26 Thread Renan DelValle
All, The vote to accept the proposed packages as our official binary packages for Apache Aurora 0.19.x has passed. +1 (Binding) -- Renan DelValle David McLaughlin Stephan Erb There were no 0 or-1 votes. There were no non-binding votes. The official packages are now

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

2018-01-16 Thread Bill Farner
We'll need to step back to a new point release. I should be able to kick this off next week unless i am beaten to the punch. On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Renan DelValle wrote: > Should we try releasing the binaries again now that we tackled this issue? > There's

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

2018-01-15 Thread Renan DelValle
Should we try releasing the binaries again now that we tackled this issue? There's been a few folks on the Slack channel have been asking when the binaries for 0.19 will be released. -Renan On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > I reverse my vote to -1 and am

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

2017-12-13 Thread Bill Farner
I reverse my vote to -1 and am closing the vote as failed. Turns out i had some old debs in my dist/ dir, and the test script picked those up. After clearing those, i encounter the same issue. Here is the culprit: $ ag -i THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.startup.sh 37: