Yes, we should avoid this kind of diversion.
My knowledge of C# is however too limited to know of a better solution. I
sure hope someone can tell what the right solution is.
Niels Basjes
On 5 Dec 2016 01:27, "Ryan Blue" wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to put that together. I don't think we sh
Hi everyone,
I'm going to have some time to build 1.8.2 RC2 the 17th and 18th. If you'd
like to get something in, please link it under AVRO-1885 or reply to this
with the issue and we'll try to get it in. Thanks!
rb
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time
Thanks for taking the time to put that together. I don't think we should
let the docker image diverge from what is generally used outside. If we
think that we need to update scripts, then we should update docker to
reflect that change, too, so we don't get into a situation where what we
test with (
What do you think of this very simple attempt?
https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/153
Niels
On 1 Dec 2016 18:31, "Ryan Blue" wrote:
> I'd like to get a release out as well. I'm happy to roll another RC soon.
>
> Could someone look at the C# issue that was a problem for some people
> during the
I'd like to get a release out as well. I'm happy to roll another RC soon.
Could someone look at the C# issue that was a problem for some people
during the last vote? It would be nice to have something that works both
inside and outside docker, without detecting whether or not it is running
in dock
Hi,
What is the current status of the new release?
The first RC failed yet I would really like to see it 'out there'.
So what is the status at the moment?
--
Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
Niels Basjes
