[INFO] Build is broken on the archetypes

Hi guys, due to the last changes on the IOChannelFactory and the Beam filesystems, the build is broken on the archetypes: [INFO] [ERROR]

Re: Future processing time timers and final watermark

Generally you shouldn't need to hold the watermark. The fact that the input watermark of the DoFn has advanced to the final watermark (i.e. positive infinity) means that all of the windows expire. At this point, any window with buffered data that is not finished should have its remaining elements

Re: Seeking help for running bash script in Maven

I don't believe this has anything to do with Maven. Maven isn't passing any arguments to the script, or anything similar. Script's location is figured out here: HERE="$(dirname $0)" and then used to like this: ARCHETYPE_ROOT="${HERE}/src/main/resources/archetype-resources" mkdir -p

Re: First stable release: version designation?

The bigger letters aimed to indicate "strongly in favor of" as opposed to "weakly in favor of." I'm OK with not using a doc, just responding to Ted's question. On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > What's the difference between first and second, third and fourth

Re: First stable release: version designation?

Slight preference for 1.0.0, but fine with 2.0.0 Thanks, Manu On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:24 AM Chamikara Jayalath wrote: > +1 for 2.0.0 for following reason. > > I think the main Downside for using 2.0.0 is the fact that people > incorrectly assuming this to be the second

Re: First stable release: version designation?

+1 for 2.0.0 for following reason. I think the main Downside for using 2.0.0 is the fact that people incorrectly assuming this to be the second stable release. This can be easily clarified through documentation. I think Beam is more mature than a product that is moving from an unstable 0.9 to the

Re: First stable release: version designation?

Let's not use the side document, please. The document has to be world-writable, and accidental changes can occur. I'd kindly ask to use email for this one, as usual, to keep a record (in this specific case). On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > What's the

Re: First stable release: version designation?

What's the difference between first and second, third and fourth columns ? On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:36 PM, María García Herrero < mari...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion, Ted. Get your vote in here >

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congratulation Davor On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 11:09 AM, María García Herrero < mari...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Wow! Congratulations, Davor! > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Ahmet Altay > wrote: > > > Congratulations, well deserved! > > > > On Thu, May 4,

Re: Slack Invites

Off-topic: The most annoying thing (to me) is that Slack's auto-detection of self-invite bots is very sensitive to frequent invites of just one member. When this activates, we get blocked from inviting more people and we have to contact Slack support to unblock further invites. They resolve it

Re: First stable release: version designation?

Maybe create a google doc with columns as the camps. Each person can put his/her name under the camp in his/her favor. On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Thomas Weise wrote: > I'm in the relaxed 1.0.0 camp. > > -- > sent from mobile > On May 4, 2017 12:29 PM, "Mingmin Xu"

Re: First stable release: version designation?

My vote, like Davor: Slight preference toward 2.0.0, but fine with 1.0.0 On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Thomas Weise wrote: > I'm in the relaxed 1.0.0 camp. > > -- > sent from mobile > On May 4, 2017 12:29 PM, "Mingmin Xu" wrote: > >> I slightly prefer1.0.0

Re: First stable release: version designation?

I'm in the relaxed 1.0.0 camp. -- sent from mobile On May 4, 2017 12:29 PM, "Mingmin Xu" wrote: > I slightly prefer1.0.0 for the *first* stable release, but fine with 2.0.0. > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Lukasz Cwik > wrote: > > > Put me

Re: First stable release: version designation?

Put me under Strongly for 2.0.0 On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > I'll join Davor's group. > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > > I don't think we have reached a consensus here yet. Let's re-examine this

Re: First stable release: version designation?

I'll join Davor's group. On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > I don't think we have reached a consensus here yet. Let's re-examine this > after some time has passed. > > If I understand everyone's opinion correctly, this is the summary: > > Strongly for

Re: First stable release: version designation?

I don't think we have reached a consensus here yet. Let's re-examine this after some time has passed. If I understand everyone's opinion correctly, this is the summary: Strongly for 2.0.0: * Aljoscha * Dan Slight preference toward 2.0.0, but fine with 1.0.0: * Davor Strongly for 1.0.0: none.

Process for getting the first stable release out

We've been working on the first stable release for a while now -- we've been tracking blocking issues [1], resolved many of them, organized a hackathon [2], and improved testing coverage in various areas. I think we are nearly done -- there are a few more blocking issues left in JIRA, and

Re: Slack Invites

Hi, Apache Ignite [1] is using Gitter, and it seems to work really well. Best regards, Vladisav [1] https://gitter.im/apacheignite/ignite On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Jason Kuster wrote: > Gitter does look like it solves many of the challenges we've been

Re: Slack Invites

Gitter does look like it solves many of the challenges we've been facing and looks like it's had wide adoption in some open-source communities. I haven't found any other official Apache projects using it, so we could be the vanguard here. On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Eric Anderson

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Wow! Congratulations, Davor! On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote: > Congratulations, well deserved! > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Andrew Psaltis > wrote: > > > Congrats Davor! > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:34 PM,

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congratulations, well deserved! On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Andrew Psaltis wrote: > Congrats Davor! > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Melissa Pashniak < > meliss...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > > > Congratulations Davor! > > > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:32

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congratulations Davor! On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Robert Bradshaw < rober...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Congratulations, Davor! Well deserved. > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Hadar Hod > wrote: > > Congrats, Davor! > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:56 AM,

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congratulations, Davor! Well deserved. On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Hadar Hod wrote: > Congrats, Davor! > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Chamikara Jayalath > wrote: > >> Congrats Davor. Very well deserved. >> >> - Cham >> >> On Thu, May 4,

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congrats, Davor! On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Chamikara Jayalath wrote: > Congrats Davor. Very well deserved. > > - Cham > > On Thu, May 4, 2017, 8:51 AM tarush grover > wrote: > > > Congrats Davor > > > > Regards, > > Tarush > > On Thu, 4 May

Re: Slack Invites

While on the topic: Have we considered alternatives like Gitter ? I'm not very familiar with Slack or Gitter, but Gitter advertises being a little friendlier to open invites. On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:38 AM Dan Halperin wrote: > My understanding is

Re: Slack Invites

My understanding is that if you use something like that plugin, and they detect it, Slack will ban you from new invites entirely or otherwise punish you. They want this friction for free projects so that there's pressure to pay. On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Jesse Anderson

Slack Invites

Is possible to change how Slack invites are handled? This might encourage our community contributions. Right now, people have to email in (causing extra dev@/user@ emails). I did a quick search and found this so people can invite themselves. Thanks, Jesse --

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congrats Davor. Very well deserved. - Cham On Thu, May 4, 2017, 8:51 AM tarush grover wrote: > Congrats Davor > > Regards, > Tarush > On Thu, 4 May 2017 at 8:54 PM, Frances Perry wrote: > > > Woohoo! So well deserved. > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congratulations Davor. Well deserved! On May 4, 2017 12:30 AM, "Jason Kuster" wrote: Hi all, The ASF has just published a blog post[1] welcoming new members of the Apache Software Foundation, and our own Davor Bonaci is among them! Congratulations and thank you

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congrats Davor Regards, Tarush On Thu, 4 May 2017 at 8:54 PM, Frances Perry wrote: > Woohoo! So well deserved. > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Etienne Chauchot > wrote: > > > Congratulations Davor! > > > > Well deserved indeed! > > > > > > > > Le

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Woohoo! So well deserved. On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Etienne Chauchot wrote: > Congratulations Davor! > > Well deserved indeed! > > > > Le 04/05/2017 à 17:02, Thomas Groh a écrit : > >> Congratulations! >> >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Thomas Weise

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congratulations Davor! Your membership is really deserved, You really got the Apache spirit ! On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Thomas Groh wrote: > Congratulations! > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Thomas Weise wrote: > >> Congrats! >> >> >> On Thu,

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congratulations! On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Thomas Weise wrote: > Congrats! > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Sourabh Bajaj < > sourabhba...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > > > Congrats!! > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:48 AM Mingmin Xu wrote: > > > > >

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congrats! On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Sourabh Bajaj < sourabhba...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Congrats!! > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:48 AM Mingmin Xu wrote: > > > Congratulations @Davor! > > > > > > > On May 4, 2017, at 7:08 AM, Amit Sela wrote:

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congrats!! On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:48 AM Mingmin Xu wrote: > Congratulations @Davor! > > > > On May 4, 2017, at 7:08 AM, Amit Sela wrote: > > > > Congratulations Davor! > > > >> On Thu, May 4, 2017, 10:02 JingsongLee wrote: >

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congratulations @Davor! > On May 4, 2017, at 7:08 AM, Amit Sela wrote: > > Congratulations Davor! > >> On Thu, May 4, 2017, 10:02 JingsongLee wrote: >> >> Congratulations! >> -- >>

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congratulations! -- From:Jesse Anderson Time:2017 May 4 (Thu) 21:36 To:dev Subject:Re: Congratulations Davor! Congrats! On Thu, May 4, 2017, 6:20 AM Aljoscha Krettek 

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congrats! On Thu, May 4, 2017, 6:20 AM Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > Congrats! :-) > > On 4. May 2017, at 14:34, Kenneth Knowles > wrote: > > > > Awesome! > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:19 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > >>

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congrats! :-) > On 4. May 2017, at 14:34, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > Awesome! > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:19 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > >> Congratulations, Davor! >> >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Aviem Zur wrote: >> >>>

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congratulations, Davor! On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Aviem Zur wrote: > Congrats Davor! :) > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:42 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Congrats ! Well deserved ;) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 05/04/2017 09:30 AM, Jason

Jenkins build is back to stable : beam_Release_NightlySnapshot #404

See

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congrats Davor! :) On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:42 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Congrats ! Well deserved ;) > > Regards > JB > > On 05/04/2017 09:30 AM, Jason Kuster wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The ASF has just published a blog post[1] welcoming new members of the > > Apache

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congrats ! Well deserved ;) Regards JB On 05/04/2017 09:30 AM, Jason Kuster wrote: Hi all, The ASF has just published a blog post[1] welcoming new members of the Apache Software Foundation, and our own Davor Bonaci is among them! Congratulations and thank you to Davor for all of your work for