Good to hear from you and good to hear the news. Release branch cut date
for 2.24 is 8/12.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 5:01 PM Chad Dombrova wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sorry I've been AWOL. I've been pulled in a number of different
> directions.
>
> We are still increasing our use of Beam, and I have it
Hi all,
Sorry I've been AWOL. I've been pulled in a number of different directions.
We are still increasing our use of Beam, and I have it on my todo list to
reach out to Kenneth about how Beam could be expanded into the VFX /
Animation industries.
Our industry uses a number of specialized
Thank you! Shared on Slack as well.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 4:33 PM Ahmet Altay wrote:
> OK, tweeted the message. Could you share on Slack?
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 4:28 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev
> wrote:
>
>> Alright, let's publish the message on Twitter and echo on Slack once
>> that's done.
OK, tweeted the message. Could you share on Slack?
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 4:28 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev
wrote:
> Alright, let's publish the message on Twitter and echo on Slack once
> that's done.
> Thank you!
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:31 PM Ahmet Altay wrote:
>
>> That sounds reasonable to
Alright, let's publish the message on Twitter and echo on Slack once that's
done.
Thank you!
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:31 PM Ahmet Altay wrote:
> That sounds reasonable to me. I agree, it is better to get specific
> reasons rather than a yes/no answer.
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:50 PM
Currently no. We're already experiencing a backlog of builds so the
additional load would be a problem. I've opened two related issues that I
think need completion before allowing non-committers to trigger tests:
Load sharing improvements: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10281
Admin
Was about to ask the same question, so can non-committers trigger the tests
now?
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:54 AM Heejong Lee wrote:
> This is awesome. Could non-committers also trigger the test now?
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:12 AM Damian Gadomski <
> damian.gadom...@polidea.com> wrote:
>
Sorry I didn't mention my username.
My JIRA username is: fuyuwei
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:21 PM Yuwei Fu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to request JIRA contributor permission.
>
Thank you for clarifying.
Would you mind clarifying whether the issues that I experience running
Kafka IO on Flink (or DirectRunner for testing) specific to my setup etc.
or this setup is not yet fully functional (for Python SDK)?
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:03 PM Chamikara Jayalath
wrote:
>
Hello,
I would like to request JIRA contributor permission.
Hi Apache Beam Support Team,
I am currently using FileIO with ParquetIO.sink() to write parquet files to s3
and need to assume role in-order to access s3 written files by multiple aws
accounts.
But currently I am facing some AWS related issue. I have created stackoverflow
question with
Hello,
Would someone kindly provide me (tysonjh) with edit access to the wiki? I don't
have any updates planned now but as I go through pages I'd like the ability to
fix broken links, add information, or update stale content.
Thanks,
-Tyson
My questions were just an example. I fully agree there is a fundamental
need for a sorted state (of some form, and I also think this links to
efficient implementation of retrations) - I was reacting to Kenn's
question about BIP. This one would be pretty nice example why it would
be good to
Beam does not have a concept of general availability. It's released with
Beam so available. Some of the APIs used by Kafka are experimental so are
subject to change (but less likely at this point).
Various runners may offer their own levels of availability for
cross-language transforms.
Thanks,
This is awesome. Could non-committers also trigger the test now?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:12 AM Damian Gadomski
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Good news, we've just migrated to the new CI: https://ci-beam.apache.org.
> As from now beam projects at builds.apache.org are disabled.
>
> If you experience any
I also wanted to clarify whether Kafka IO for Python SDK is general
availability or is it still experimental?
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:52 PM Piotr Filipiuk
wrote:
> For completeness I am also attaching task manager logs.
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:32 PM Piotr Filipiuk
> wrote:
>
>> Thank
Welcome, I have added you as a contributor.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:13 AM Jiadai Xia wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I am Jiadai Xia and I am working as a SWE intern at Google this summer and
> I would like to be added as a contributor in the Jira.
>
> My ASF Jira username is danielxjd.
>
> Thanks,
>
Hi!
I am Jiadai Xia and I am working as a SWE intern at Google this summer and
I would like to be added as a contributor in the Jira.
My ASF Jira username is danielxjd.
Thanks,
Jiadai
*Jiadai Xia*
SWE Intern
1 (646) 413 8071
daniel...@google.com
Done. Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:30 AM Tyson Hamilton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would someone kindly provide me (tysonjh) with edit access to the wiki? I
> don't have any updates planned now but as I go through pages I'd like the
> ability to fix broken links, add information, or update stale
Jan - my proposal is exactly TimeSortedBagState (more accurately -
TimeSortedListState), though I went a bit further and also proposed a way
to have a dynamic number of tagged TimeSortedBagStates.
You are correct that the runner doesn't really have to store the data time
sorted - what's actually
Hi Katarzyna,
I have linked the Python snowflake connector with the Cross platform one.
And I agree that we can , if needed in future reopen the issue based on
users feedback.
*Regards*
Shashanka Balakuntala Srinivasa
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:54 PM Katarzyna Kucharczyk <
Big +1 for a BIP, as this might really help clarify all the pros and
cons of all possibilities. There seem to be questions that need
answering and motivating use cases - do we need sorted map state or can
we solve our use cases by something simpler - e.g. the mentioned
TimeSortedBagState? Does
@Shashanka Balakuntala We are waiting for the
Java Snowflake connector to be reviewed [1] and when it will be available
we will publish code for a cross-language connector (it should be rather
soon). We tested this code on Flink runner and the only issue we found for
now is that it's impossible
Thanks, appreciated the links.
Ended up using `Read.from` using an UnboundedSource due to some challenges
with the actual splitting part of SDF.
Perhaps it's trivial knowledge, but just sharing here that when testing (in
direct runner) with unbounded sources, one has to test with more elements
24 matches
Mail list logo
