>
> Great news, Thanks Hannah for all your attention to this issue, let's not
> forget to thank the INFRA guys for their help.
Great point, I left additional comment to the ticket.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:06 AM Kyle Weaver wrote:
> Hi Ismael, thanks for bringing that up. Can you please
Hi Ismael, thanks for bringing that up. Can you please start a new thread
for the image cleanup issue, including details on which images you mean? I
want to make sure it has sufficient visibility.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:23 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> Independent to this thread, but slightly
Independent to this thread, but slightly related.
I ended up looking at the gcr.io images we use for testing and noticed that
there are literally hundreds of them, do we have clean up jobs for those?
Can anyone take a look so we don't end up wasting resources there too.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at
Great news, Thanks Hannah for all your attention to this issue, let's not
forget to thank the INFRA guys for their help.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 2:03 AM Hannah Jiang wrote:
> Thanks everyone for reporting issues and potential problems etc.
> Please feel free to let me know if you have any
Thanks everyone for reporting issues and potential problems etc.
Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions or see additional
issues!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 4:17 PM Pablo Estrada wrote:
> Thanks Hannah! This is great : )
> -P.
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:47 PM Robert Burke
Thanks Hannah! This is great : )
-P.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:47 PM Robert Burke wrote:
> It was only merged in an hour ago. That explains why I still saw it as
> broken before lunch. Thanks again!
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 12:42 PM Robert Burke wrote:
>
>> NVM. I had stale pages for some
It was only merged in an hour ago. That explains why I still saw it as
broken before lunch. Thanks again!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 12:42 PM Robert Burke wrote:
> NVM. I had stale pages for some reason. Hannah fixed them already. :D
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 12:39 PM Robert Burke wrote:
>
>> Looks
NVM. I had stale pages for some reason. Hannah fixed them already. :D
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 12:39 PM Robert Burke wrote:
> Looks like the change broke the go post commits. I've filed BEAM-9374 for
> it. I think I know how to fix it though.
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 12:18 PM Kyle Weaver wrote:
Is it still failing after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10936?
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:39 PM Robert Burke wrote:
> Looks like the change broke the go post commits. I've filed BEAM-9374 for
> it. I think I know how to fix it though.
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 12:18 PM Kyle Weaver wrote:
Looks like the change broke the go post commits. I've filed BEAM-9374 for
it. I think I know how to fix it though.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 12:18 PM Kyle Weaver wrote:
> I wonder if searching for "apache beam" (instead of "apache/beam") will
> ever work on Docker hub once the new images start
I wonder if searching for "apache beam" (instead of "apache/beam") will
ever work on Docker hub once the new images start getting more downloads.
Currently no relevant results are included. Unfortunately this might not be
something we can control, as it seems Docker hub's search is not as
Thank you, Hannah! This is great.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:24 AM Hannah Jiang
wrote:
> Hello team
>
> Docker SDK images (Python, Java, Go) and Flink job server images are
> migrated to Apache org[1].
> I confirmed digests of all the images of the two repos are exactly the
> same.
> In
Hello team
Docker SDK images (Python, Java, Go) and Flink job server images are
migrated to Apache org[1].
I confirmed digests of all the images of the two repos are exactly the same.
In addition, I updated readme pages of the new repos. The readma pages
match to the ones at github.
New images
13 matches
Mail list logo
