Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

(Sounds good, thanks! We'll follow-up there.) On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:49 AM, David Morávek wrote: > Hi Davor, > > sorry for the delay, we were blocked by our legal department. I've send > both SGA and CCLA to priv...@apache.beam.org, please let me know if you > need

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hi Davor, sorry for the delay, we were blocked by our legal department. I've send both SGA and CCLA to priv...@apache.beam.org, please let me know if you need anything else. Regards, David On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 6:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Davor, > > We still

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hi Davor, We still have some discussion/paperwork on Euphoria side (SGA, ...). So, it's on track but it takes a little more time than expected. Regards JB On 02/19/2018 05:40 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > I may have missed things, but any update on the progress of this donation? > > On Tue, Jan

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

I may have missed things, but any update on the progress of this donation? On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Great ! > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > On 01/03/2018 07:29 AM, David Morávek wrote: > >> Hello JB, >> >> Perfect! I'm already on the Beam

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Great ! Thanks ! Regards JB On 01/03/2018 07:29 AM, David Morávek wrote: Hello JB, Perfect! I'm already on the Beam Slack workspace, I'll contact you once I get to the office. Thanks! D. On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hello JB, Perfect! I'm already on the Beam Slack workspace, I'll contact you once I get to the office. Thanks! D. On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi David, > > absolutely !! Let's move forward on the preparation steps. > > Are you on Slack

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hi David, absolutely !! Let's move forward on the preparation steps. Are you on Slack and/or hangout to plan this ? Thanks, Regards JB On 01/02/2018 05:35 PM, David Morávek wrote: Hello JB, can we help in any way to move things forward? Thanks, D. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:28 PM,

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

+1 here. I already liked Euphoria, and I like the merger even more :-) Kenn On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Tyler Akidau wrote: > +1, I'm supportive of seeing this move forward. What remaining concrete > concerns are there? > > -Tyler > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 8:35 AM

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

+1, I'm supportive of seeing this move forward. What remaining concrete concerns are there? -Tyler On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 8:35 AM David Morávek wrote: > Hello JB, > > can we help in any way to move things forward? > > Thanks, > D. > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:28 PM,

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hello JB, can we help in any way to move things forward? Thanks, D. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Thanks Jan, > > It makes sense. > > Let me take a look on the code to understand the "interaction". > > Regards > JB > > > On 12/18/2017 04:26

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Thanks Jan, It makes sense. Let me take a look on the code to understand the "interaction". Regards JB On 12/18/2017 04:26 PM, Jan Lukavský wrote: Hi JB, basically you are not wrong. The project started about three or four years ago with a goal to unify batch and streaming processing into

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hi JB, basically you are not wrong. The project started about three or four years ago with a goal to unify batch and streaming processing into single portable, executor independent API. Because of that, it is currently "close" to Beam in this sense. But we don't see much added value keeping

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hi Jan, Thanks for your answers. However, they confused me ;) Regarding what you replied, Euphoria seems like a programming model/SDK "close" to Beam more than a DSL on top of an existing Beam SDK. Am I wrong ? Regards JB On 12/18/2017 03:44 PM, Jan Lukavský wrote: Hi Ismael, basically

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hi Ismael, basically we adopted the Beam's design regarding partitioning (https://github.com/seznam/euphoria/issues/160) and implemented the sorting manually (https://github.com/seznam/euphoria/issues/158). I'm not aware of the time model differences (Euphoria supports ingestion and event

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hi, It is great to see that you guys have achieved a maturity point to propose this. Congratulations for your work and the idea to contribute it into Beam. I remember from a previous discussion with Jan about the model mismatch between Euphoria and Beam, because of some design decisions of both

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Depending of the donation, you would need ICLA for each contributor, and CCLA in addition of SGA. We can sync with Davor and I for the legal stuff. However, I would wait a little bit just to have feedback from the whole team and start a formal vote. I would be happy to start the formal vote.

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hello, Thanks for the awesome feedback! Romain: We already use Java Stream API in all operators where it makes sense (eg.: ReduceByKey). Still not sure if it was a good choice, but i can be easily converted to iterator anyway. Side outputs support is coming soon, we already made an initial

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hi guys A DSL would be very welcomed, in particular if fluent. Open question: did you study to implement Stream API (surely extending it to have a BeamStream and a few more features like sides etc)? Would be very natural and integrable easily anywhere and avoid a new API discovery. Hazelcast

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hi David, As JB noted, merging of these two projects is a great idea. If fact, some of us have had those discussions in the past. Legally, nothing particular is strictly necessary as the code seem to already be Apache 2.0 licensed. We don't, however, want to be perceived as making hostile forks,

Re: Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hi David, Generally speaking, having different fluent DSL on top of the Beam SDK is great. I would like to take a look on your wordcount examples to give you a complete feedback. I like the idea and a fluent Java DSL is valuable. Let's wait feedback from others. If we have a consensus, then

Euphoria Java 8 DSL - proposal

Hello, First of all, thanks for the amazing work the Apache Beam community is doing! In 2014, we've started development of the runtime independent Java 8 API, that helps us to create unified big-data processing flows. It has been used as a core building block of Seznam.cz web crawler data