Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.0, release candidate #1

Sorry those were copy paste errors in the email. The actual version is indeed 2.2.0. On Oct 26, 2017 10:01 PM, "Eugene Kirpichov" wrote: Reuven, some things in this seem odd: the version 1.2.3 which should probably be 2.2.0, and shouldn't it be built with JDK7? or

Jenkins build is back to normal : beam_SeedJob_Standalone #33

See

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.0, release candidate #1

Reuven, some things in this seem odd: the version 1.2.3 which should probably be 2.2.0, and shouldn't it be built with JDK7? or is it built with 8 but targeting 7? On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, 6:36 PM Reuven Lax wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release

Re: [Proposal] Add performance tests for commonly used file-based I/O PTransforms

I am really excited about this development. Glad to have such a detailed document! Thanks for taking the time to write it up thoughtfully. On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Chamikara Jayalath < chamik...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Thanks Łukasz and the team for the proposal. I think fixing

Re: Java pre/post commit test suite breakage

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Robert Bradshaw < > rober...@google.com.invalid> wrote: >> >> These are just some ideas; I honestly don't know. I think my upper limit >> for default precommit feedback is probably 30

Jenkins build is back to normal : beam_SeedJob #553

See

[VOTE] Release 2.2.0, release candidate #1

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 1.2.3, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * JIRA release notes

Re: [Proposal] Apache Beam Swag Store

Have you run this through tradema...@apache.org yet? I bring this up for two reasons: 1) We would need to make sure the appearance and such of the logo is “correct” 2).A few years ago, Apache did have a partnership with a company that would produce various swag things and then donate a

Re: [Proposal] Sharing Neville's post and upcoming meetups in the Twitter handle

Done. On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Griselda Cuevas wrote: > Hi folks, could you help us to tweet the second part of Neville's blogpost? > > Here's a suggested tweet: > 2nd part of @sinisa_lyh's post is out! Read how @Spotify developed Scio, a > high level Scala API 4 the

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob_Standalone #32

See -- Started by timer [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on beam8 (beam) in workspace

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #552

See -- Started by timer [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on beam8 (beam) in workspace > git rev-parse

Re: Beam Seed Job

I was unable to achieve my goal due to the GHPRB trigger not exposing the ability to cancel irrelevant builds when PRs are updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3105 Note that I reset the Jenkins jobs to what is checked in apache/master head, the noisy seed job failure e-mails should

Jenkins build is back to normal : beam_SeedJob #551

See

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #550

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 76e498c044848975d59cc544b9b461d2bc11a47c, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 76e498c044848975d59cc544b9b461d2bc11a47c to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #549

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit fea2aaa637edb631117ed2bc7bab505696aac182, no merge conflicts. Setting status of fea2aaa637edb631117ed2bc7bab505696aac182 to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #547

See Changes: [lcwik] fixup -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit e5d89ed9bc7a334e94a0add818ac0830396d697c, no merge conflicts. Setting status of

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #546

See Changes: [lcwik] fixup -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 564c513819201a65101767f5cba823326e22e14a, no merge conflicts. Setting status of

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #545

See Changes: [lcwik] fixup -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 72523b503d9c33ad8edc46546dd0ac8789c695a3, no merge conflicts. Setting status of

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #544

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit c63e9772e2bfe53bc5b40264e370a60b98efe9f9, no merge conflicts. Setting status of c63e9772e2bfe53bc5b40264e370a60b98efe9f9 to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #543

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 98d914b3f71abec3f2c9859ecf7520c7fbe0ba49, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 98d914b3f71abec3f2c9859ecf7520c7fbe0ba49 to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #542

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 98d914b3f71abec3f2c9859ecf7520c7fbe0ba49, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 98d914b3f71abec3f2c9859ecf7520c7fbe0ba49 to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #541

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 22a77d2ffe65d0449fcd98d587c4b718ba5a0881, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 22a77d2ffe65d0449fcd98d587c4b718ba5a0881 to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #540

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 715b8681530432ed0384d989cdef43e316f11849, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 715b8681530432ed0384d989cdef43e316f11849 to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #539

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 10a59799b8e7d92ec6c9bdcdb3ac70aae459da16, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 10a59799b8e7d92ec6c9bdcdb3ac70aae459da16 to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #537

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit f019cc41fbb54c7c159053d93d6a32cb138f8c2c, no merge conflicts. Setting status of f019cc41fbb54c7c159053d93d6a32cb138f8c2c to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #536

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 2549c2a0b7fd7d39ef94bb1689165717bbe28d5c, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 2549c2a0b7fd7d39ef94bb1689165717bbe28d5c to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #535

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 5e82bc31f90a947584f06984366bf1c9a905f16f, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 5e82bc31f90a947584f06984366bf1c9a905f16f to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #534

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit ea76d669d4ce5a80c38a182012670d5b62146f6e, no merge conflicts. Setting status of ea76d669d4ce5a80c38a182012670d5b62146f6e to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #533

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 8a3d806a089a6062430096c31990b73ee434ef23, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 8a3d806a089a6062430096c31990b73ee434ef23 to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #532

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 1cc940c2fe5e06cabf3b4d4abfd14812caea, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 1cc940c2fe5e06cabf3b4d4abfd14812caea to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #531

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 23582dd27f21776bdaf8be5e3a873ed0ea6d, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 23582dd27f21776bdaf8be5e3a873ed0ea6d to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #530

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 3de308759405e1b04a9abcae6946327277ace4d3, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 3de308759405e1b04a9abcae6946327277ace4d3 to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #529

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 60cb14a1addbd7d5f57f2fb609fe6979cc584a95, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 60cb14a1addbd7d5f57f2fb609fe6979cc584a95 to PENDING with url

Re: [Proposal] Apache Beam Swag Store

Logos by themselves are g2g, but I've heard that folks wish it had the name. On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Eric Anderson wrote: > My only comment as well: more Apache Beam and some with just the logo (not > sure if that is allowed). > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #527

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit d1e6a29d74ffe128f03e75e184a64bab70cf953e, no merge conflicts. Setting status of d1e6a29d74ffe128f03e75e184a64bab70cf953e to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #526

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 5f3513441bb8164e17b9d7e67a4e3270ab23d345, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 5f3513441bb8164e17b9d7e67a4e3270ab23d345 to PENDING with url

Beam Seed Job

I'm trying to get builds to be cancelled if a PR is updated to prevent tying up Jenkins resources on Beam executors. Please ignore the seed job failure e-mails for today. Luke

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #524

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit 060a7cb66ef81d9597dc3075d00e8b01583673a6, no merge conflicts. Setting status of 060a7cb66ef81d9597dc3075d00e8b01583673a6 to PENDING with url

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_SeedJob #522

See -- GitHub pull request #4042 of commit ac4eeb32e501256791fa0a22b86596ccdf71a0e9, no merge conflicts. Setting status of ac4eeb32e501256791fa0a22b86596ccdf71a0e9 to PENDING with url

Re: [Proposal] Apache Beam Swag Store

My only comment as well: more Apache Beam and some with just the logo (not sure if that is allowed). On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:27 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > I believe that Apache trademark guidelines require the full name "Apache > Beam". Also good in other ways, like

Re: [Proposal] Apache Beam Swag Store

I believe that Apache trademark guidelines require the full name "Apache Beam". Also good in other ways, like easier to search for, maybe more memorable, more appealing for fans of the ASF and open source in general. On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Pablo Estrada

Re: [Proposal] Sharing Neville's post and upcoming meetups in the Twitter handle

Hi folks, could you help us to tweet the second part of Neville's blogpost? Here's a suggested tweet: 2nd part of @sinisa_lyh's post is out! Read how @Spotify developed Scio, a high level Scala API 4 the Beam Java SDK. https://goo.gl/kyjr4n Thx! On 20 October 2017 at 13:08, Griselda Cuevas

Re: [Proposal] Apache Beam Swag Store

I like the designs, and I like the idea of the store. How hard is it to set up and keep the store? : ) On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:54 AM Griselda Cuevas wrote: > Hi everyone - pinging the thread to see what do you folks think about the > store idea and the initial

Re: [Proposal] Apache Beam Swag Store

Hi everyone - pinging the thread to see what do you folks think about the store idea and the initial designs for t-shirts, hoodies and stickers. On 25 October 2017 at 09:02, Griselda Cuevas wrote: > Ok, I just discovered I can't attach a file :s > > Here is the link: >

Re: Java pre/post commit test suite breakage

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Robert Bradshaw < rober...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > > These are just some ideas; I honestly don't know. I think my upper limit > for default precommit feedback is probably 30 minutes, and even there I am > not very happy. > > > We should be able to get a good